TBD 1-0 TBD
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.32 2.04 2.40 | 420 461 410 | 25 6 19 | / 6 3 3 / | 4 1 3 | +19 +3 +16 | 87% 100% 83% | 263 255 265 | 25% 33% 21% | 5 1 4 | 3 0 3 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.39 2.80 1.04 | 164 283 135 | 10 4 6 | / 5 0 5 / | 5 1 4 | +5 +4 +1 | 93% 100% 92% | 117 216 93 | 25% 36% 19% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.30 0.62 1.47 | 195 90 222 | 13 1 12 | / 6 2 4 / | 2 1 1 | +7 -1 +8 | 87% 100% 83% | 138 68 155 | 24% 33% 23% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.26 0.60 1.43 | 218 82 253 | 10 1 9 | / 8 2 6 / | 14 3 11 | +2 -1 +3 | 87% 67% 92% | 154 47 181 | 24% 25% 24% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.14 1.03 1.17 | 146 170 140 | 7 1 6 | / 7 2 5 / | 10 3 7 | 0 -1 +1 | 87% 100% 83% | 118 157 108 | 24% 50% 17% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.85 0.91 0.60 | 172 171 178 | 9 7 2 | / 12 11 1 / | 5 4 1 | -3 -4 +1 | 60% 58% 67% | 127 120 154 | 23% 18% 43% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.82 0.93 0.39 | 166 173 136 | 8 7 1 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 3 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 67% 67% 67% | 119 123 103 | 26% 26% 25% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.68 0.57 1.14 | 134 111 226 | 6 3 3 | / 13 10 3 / | 2 1 1 | -7 -7 0 | 47% 42% 67% | 124 110 179 | 19% 12% 44% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.24 0.15 0.62 | 112 99 167 | 5 3 2 | / 14 11 3 / | 5 2 3 | -9 -8 -1 | 47% 33% 100% | 73 67 98 | 0% 0% 0% | 1 1 0 | 3 3 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.20 0.23 0.05 | 75 76 73 | 4 3 1 | / 12 11 1 / | 3 3 0 | -8 -8 0 | 40% 33% 67% | 40 43 30 | 20% 29% 0% | 2 1 1 | 4 4 0 | -2 -3 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.04 2.40 2.32 | 420 461 410 | 25 6 19 | / 6 3 3 / | 4 1 3 | +19 +3 +16 | 87% 100% 83% | 263 255 265 | 25% 33% 21% | 5 1 4 | 3 0 3 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
2.80 1.04 1.39 | 164 283 135 | 10 4 6 | / 5 0 5 / | 5 1 4 | +5 +4 +1 | 93% 100% 92% | 117 216 93 | 25% 36% 19% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.62 1.47 1.30 | 195 90 222 | 13 1 12 | / 6 2 4 / | 2 1 1 | +7 -1 +8 | 87% 100% 83% | 138 68 155 | 24% 33% 23% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.60 1.43 1.26 | 218 82 253 | 10 1 9 | / 8 2 6 / | 14 3 11 | +2 -1 +3 | 87% 67% 92% | 154 47 181 | 24% 25% 24% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.03 1.17 1.14 | 146 170 140 | 7 1 6 | / 7 2 5 / | 10 3 7 | 0 -1 +1 | 87% 100% 83% | 118 157 108 | 24% 50% 17% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.91 0.60 0.85 | 172 171 178 | 9 7 2 | / 12 11 1 / | 5 4 1 | -3 -4 +1 | 60% 58% 67% | 127 120 154 | 23% 18% 43% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.93 0.39 0.82 | 166 173 136 | 8 7 1 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 3 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 67% 67% 67% | 119 123 103 | 26% 26% 25% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.57 1.14 0.68 | 134 111 226 | 6 3 3 | / 13 10 3 / | 2 1 1 | -7 -7 0 | 47% 42% 67% | 124 110 179 | 19% 12% 44% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.15 0.62 0.24 | 112 99 167 | 5 3 2 | / 14 11 3 / | 5 2 3 | -9 -8 -1 | 47% 33% 100% | 73 67 98 | 0% 0% 0% | 1 1 0 | 3 3 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.23 0.05 0.20 | 75 76 73 | 4 3 1 | / 12 11 1 / | 3 3 0 | -8 -8 0 | 40% 33% 67% | 40 43 30 | 20% 29% 0% | 2 1 1 | 4 4 0 | -2 -3 +1 |
yoccuu [#1]TBD 1-0 TBD
I disagree. TBD has been showing great potential lately compared to TBD even with the revamped rosted.
TBD 0-1 TBD
MaTrix96 [#2]I disagree. TBD has been showing great potential lately compared to TBD even with the revamped rosted.
TBD 0-1 TBD
Nah, considering how TBD played today, I think therer is a high chance that TBD gets this one over TBD. I understand your point about TBD and I agree, but I think TBD is just better. TBD 1-0 TBD.
koromast [#13]kinda fucked up to match up the guys who rested the most with the guys who just played
relax lil bro, they just played a "bo1"
esidarap [#14]relax lil bro, they just played a "bo1"
well if you wanna watch the game, youre currently seeing a vanity masterclass
and theres no way he didnt watch FL vs Fnc with those godlike reads
Aiolos [#19]how fnatic lose 10 rounds against fennels while c9 only 2 rounds
how c9 lose 13 rounds against zeta while fnatic 5 rounds
Targu1n [#15]well if you wanna watch the game, youre currently seeing a vanity masterclass
and theres no way he didnt watch FL vs Fnc with those godlike reads
it's FENNEL who decided to play the same map.
can't blame vanity for this. they are paid to play this game which includes counter strat'ng your enemies.
esidarap [#24]it's FENNEL who decided to play the same map.
can't blame vanity for this. they are paid to play this game which includes counter strat'ng your enemies.
? I dont see me blaming vanity
if anything im explicitly praising him for doing an amazing job