VLR Rankings

terrible system when are u guys gonna make real, accurate rankings

maybe bad take, but i feel like there are two ways to change the settings. One is to just reward much less for beating no-name teams and much more for beating high-ranking teams (basically a more extreme version of what we have now). The second option is to have the rankings reset after each stage, basically signaling the start of a new "season" of valorant. This would prevent teams like FaZe from just sitting in the top six after one good tourney run.

schlong [#2]

maybe bad take, but i feel like there are two ways to change the settings. One is to just reward much less for beating no-name teams and much more for beating high-ranking teams (basically a more extreme version of what we have now). The second option is to have the rankings reset after each stage, basically signaling the start of a new "season" of valorant. This would prevent teams like FaZe from just sitting in the top six after one good tourney run.

they should add point decay

the problem with this system is that it rewards playing more games/tournaments

mattgg2015 [#3]

they should add point decay

the problem with this system is that it rewards playing more games/tournaments

that mean the people who don't play it2 tourments (for example SEN) would start losing points while a t2 team will not decay because their playing in tourments

liquid being rank 1 in eu, is quite a cute joke by the rankings. liquid relies so heavily on individual performance its kinda sad

number_1_bjor_fan [#4]

that mean the people who don't play it2 tourments (for example SEN) would start losing points while a t2 team will not decay because their playing in tourments

Lower tier tournaments should fetch much lower points. Probably also add faster decay for low tier tournaments.

busterD [#5]

liquid being rank 1 in eu, is quite a cute joke by the rankings. liquid relies so heavily on individual performance its kinda sad

who cares how they win, only thing matters is they win