"This really gives insight into your thought process. You think your own subjective assessment of past results is more accurate, than that of thousands of sports-bettors, therefore you will always know which team is favored beforehand."
Yawn. This is getting tiring, having to explain the same thing over and over again to you, before your tiny brain can comprehend it. It's not subjective, it's objective. Sports bettors dont change the fact that Andbox was favoured. Andbox was objectively favoured because of their results. Its as simple as that. 1+1=2. Gen G were garbage for months on end, not even top 10 NA. Tier 2 team, like TSM. Andbox has been a consistent top 8 NA for the past 2-3 months. It's obvious and objectively true that abx were favourites.
"Great. I don't care about your words anymore, also learn to use quote blocks so people can actually understand what part you're responding to and what's your writing.
I want you to put your mouth where your money is. Start your pickems on the EU challengers qualifiers and we'll compare your success rate of determining which team is favored to the sports bettors."
Ok cool, so you realize that your argument is wrong yet you're too stubborn to admit it. and again, I'm not doing this challenge with you, because it has no relevance to the argument, and it wont prove you right at all. Even if the favoured team that I objectively find out on based on relevant match results and feats differs from sports bettors, it doesnt change the fact that I'm right.