ez for zeta
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
29 | / 22 / | 1 | +7 | |||||||||
|
20 | / 19 / | 8 | +1 | |||||||||
|
13 | / 20 / | 10 | -7 | |||||||||
|
16 | / 21 / | 4 | -5 | |||||||||
|
17 | / 17 / | 7 | 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
20 | / 17 / | 10 | +3 | |||||||||
|
27 | / 18 / | 16 | +9 | |||||||||
|
21 | / 23 / | 8 | -2 | |||||||||
|
10 | / 21 / | 14 | -11 | |||||||||
|
21 | / 16 / | 12 | +5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.36 1.17 1.39 | 323 221 340 | 44 2 13 | / 34 2 10 / | 4 0 3 | +10 0 +3 | 64% 50% 67% | 188 111 201 | 26% 10% 31% | 2 0 2 | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.51 0.01 0.67 | 106 124 | 25 0 5 | / 30 2 9 / | 8 0 0 | -5 -2 -4 | 43% 50% | 62 72 | 57% 57% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.48 0.60 0.46 | 119 158 113 | 17 1 3 | / 31 2 9 / | 14 1 3 | -14 -1 -6 | 50% 50% 50% | 86 94 85 | 17% 50% 11% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.32 0.70 0.25 | 115 151 109 | 20 1 3 | / 34 2 11 / | 4 0 0 | -14 -1 -8 | 36% 50% 33% | 82 114 77 | 13% 50% 11% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.20 0.32 0.18 | 59 132 47 | 20 1 2 | / 29 2 10 / | 9 0 2 | -9 -1 -8 | 50% 100% 42% | 27 60 21 | 0% 0% 0% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.86 2.15 0.13 | 378 441 | 46 19 0 | / 25 6 1 / | 18 2 0 | +21 +13 -1 | 79% 83% 50% | 247 288 | 28% 28% | 6 6 0 | 2 2 0 | +4 +4 0 | |
|
1.70 1.85 0.83 | 231 249 125 | 34 12 1 | / 20 3 1 / | 19 7 0 | +14 +9 0 | 86% 92% 50% | 147 159 78 | 33% 33% 33% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.24 1.09 2.13 | 205 156 505 | 20 6 4 | / 27 5 1 / | 19 5 0 | -7 +1 +3 | 86% 83% 100% | 116 96 234 | 17% 14% 25% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.21 1.09 1.92 | 154 149 192 | 30 7 2 | / 28 5 0 / | 10 2 0 | +2 +2 +2 | 86% 83% 100% | 101 98 115 | 32% 32% 33% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.97 0.89 1.43 | 166 132 379 | 28 5 3 | / 26 7 2 / | 20 10 0 | +2 -2 +1 | 79% 75% 100% | 111 89 242 | 19% 14% 50% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.36 1.17 1.39 | 323 221 340 | 15 2 13 | / 12 2 10 / | 3 0 3 | +3 0 +3 | 64% 50% 67% | 188 111 201 | 26% 10% 31% | 2 0 2 | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.51 0.01 0.67 | 106 0 124 | 5 0 5 | / 11 2 9 / | 0 0 0 | -6 -2 -4 | 43% 0% 50% | 62 0 72 | 57% 57% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.48 0.60 0.46 | 119 158 113 | 4 1 3 | / 11 2 9 / | 4 1 3 | -7 -1 -6 | 50% 50% 50% | 86 94 85 | 17% 50% 11% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.32 0.70 0.25 | 115 151 109 | 4 1 3 | / 13 2 11 / | 0 0 0 | -9 -1 -8 | 36% 50% 33% | 82 114 77 | 13% 50% 11% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.20 0.32 0.18 | 59 132 47 | 3 1 2 | / 12 2 10 / | 2 0 2 | -9 -1 -8 | 50% 100% 42% | 27 60 21 | 0% 0% 0% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.86 2.15 0.13 | 378 441 | 19 19 0 | / 7 6 1 / | 2 2 0 | +12 +13 -1 | 79% 83% 50% | 247 288 | 28% 28% | 6 6 0 | 2 2 0 | +4 +4 0 | |
|
1.70 1.85 0.83 | 231 249 125 | 13 12 1 | / 4 3 1 / | 7 7 0 | +9 +9 0 | 86% 92% 50% | 147 159 78 | 33% 33% 33% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.24 1.09 2.13 | 205 156 505 | 10 6 4 | / 6 5 1 / | 5 5 0 | +4 +1 +3 | 86% 83% 100% | 116 96 234 | 17% 14% 25% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.21 1.09 1.92 | 154 149 192 | 9 7 2 | / 5 5 0 / | 2 2 0 | +4 +2 +2 | 86% 83% 100% | 101 98 115 | 32% 32% 33% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.97 0.89 1.43 | 166 132 379 | 8 5 3 | / 9 7 2 / | 10 10 0 | -1 -2 +1 | 79% 75% 100% | 111 89 242 | 19% 14% 50% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
Unfortunate run for Zeta once again, stomped by current and previous world champions. Still, I don't think they're necessarily bad: they're one of the best in the Pacific region. The problem is their spontaneous moments of brilliance can only get you so far against teams with more flexibility and planning.
And no, I don't really think TS could've done better or that this was a waste of an LCQ spot, they deserved it.
I think every team knows Zeta will play with 2 Sentinels including Chamber after they won in LCQ with Chamber, and that's why Fnatic and NRG choose Haven as their map and the Comps is for buying time and controlling the map
I mean did they didn't have a save strat for Map Haven?
sadge
is this what is this
GG NT Zeta 💪