M80 vs. 9z Team | Champions Tour 2023 Americas: Ascension | Playoffs | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
koalanoob M80	1.68 1.77 1.64	353 390 338	21 6 15	/ 11 3 8 /	5 5 0	+10 +3 +7	88% 100% 83%	238 262 228	17% 26% 13%	6 1 5	2 0 2	+4 +1 +3
eeiu M80	1.55 1.98 1.37	218 202 225	16 5 11	/ 7 0 7 /	6 1 5	+9 +5 +4	88% 100% 83%	140 148 136	32% 50% 26%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
johnqt M80	1.36 0.95 1.53	234 193 252	16 4 12	/ 8 2 6 /	4 0 4	+8 +2 +6	88% 80% 92%	161 113 182	25% 50% 20%	2 1 1	3 1 2	-1 0 -1
NiSMO M80	1.25 1.41 1.18	236 260 226	13 5 8	/ 11 3 8 /	13 6 7	+2 +2 0	88% 80% 92%	164 129 179	35% 44% 32%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
zander M80	0.59 0.98 0.43	119 197 87	9 5 4	/ 11 3 8 /	2 0 2	-2 +2 -4	82% 100% 75%	64 87 54	20% 25% 17%	1 1 0	3 1 2	-2 0 -2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

koalanoob

M80

1.68 1.77 1.64

353 390 338

21 6 15

/ 11 3 8 /

5 5 0

+10 +3 +7

88% 100% 83%

238 262 228

17% 26% 13%

6 1 5

2 0 2

+4 +1 +3

eeiu

M80

1.55 1.98 1.37

218 202 225

16 5 11

/ 7 0 7 /

6 1 5

+9 +5 +4

88% 100% 83%

140 148 136

32% 50% 26%

0 0 0

johnqt

M80

1.36 0.95 1.53

234 193 252

16 4 12

/ 8 2 6 /

4 0 4

+8 +2 +6

88% 80% 92%

161 113 182

25% 50% 20%

2 1 1

3 1 2

-1 0 -1

NiSMO

M80

1.25 1.41 1.18

236 260 226

13 5 8

/ 11 3 8 /

13 6 7

+2 +2 0

88% 80% 92%

164 129 179

35% 44% 32%

0 0 0

zander

M80

0.59 0.98 0.43

119 197 87

9 5 4

/ 11 3 8 /

2 0 2

-2 +2 -4

82% 100% 75%

64 87 54

20% 25% 17%

1 1 0

3 1 2

-2 0 -2

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
david 9ZG	0.95 0.91 1.04	149 123 215	10 7 3	/ 13 8 5 /	6 5 1	-3 -1 -2	65% 75% 40%	103 77 167	30% 19% 45%	1 0 1	1 1 0	0 -1 +1
Tuli 9ZG	0.78 0.84 0.65	197 198 196	11 8 3	/ 15 10 5 /	3 2 1	-4 -2 -2	71% 75% 60%	150 165 115	24% 24% 25%	3 3 0	3 3 0	0 0 0
rubkkoide 9ZG	0.73 1.03 0.04	191 255 40	11 10 1	/ 16 11 5 /	4 4 0	-5 -1 -4	59% 75% 20%	110 146 24	30% 33% 0%	1 1 0	0 0 0	+1 +1 0
mizu 9ZG	0.63 0.76 0.33	141 178 55	8 7 1	/ 15 10 5 /	4 4 0	-7 -3 -4	65% 75% 40%	91 113 39	29% 36% 0%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
deigara 9ZG	0.58 0.52 0.72	151 138 185	8 5 3	/ 16 11 5 /	5 4 1	-8 -6 -2	65% 75% 40%	106 97 129	37% 29% 67%	3 2 1	5 2 3	-2 0 -2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

david

9ZG

0.95 0.91 1.04

149 123 215

10 7 3

/ 13 8 5 /

6 5 1

-3 -1 -2

65% 75% 40%

103 77 167

30% 19% 45%

1 0 1

1 1 0

0 -1 +1

Tuli

9ZG

0.78 0.84 0.65

197 198 196

11 8 3

/ 15 10 5 /

3 2 1

-4 -2 -2

71% 75% 60%

150 165 115

24% 24% 25%

3 3 0

0 0 0

rubkkoide

9ZG

0.73 1.03 0.04

191 255 40

11 10 1

/ 16 11 5 /

4 4 0

-5 -1 -4

59% 75% 20%

110 146 24

30% 33% 0%

1 1 0

0 0 0

+1 +1 0

mizu

9ZG

0.63 0.76 0.33

141 178 55

8 7 1

/ 15 10 5 /

4 4 0

-7 -3 -4

65% 75% 40%

91 113 39

29% 36% 0%

0 0 0

deigara

9ZG

0.58 0.52 0.72

151 138 185

8 5 3

/ 16 11 5 /

5 4 1

-8 -6 -2

65% 75% 40%

106 97 129

37% 29% 67%

3 2 1

5 2 3

-2 0 -2

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
eeiu M80	2.10 1.30 1.62	264 334 230	43 22 21	/ 21 4 17 /	11 4 7	+22 +18 +4	78% 94% 67%	173 223 140	38% 50% 28%	2 1 1	2 0 2	0 +1 -1
johnqt M80	1.51 1.01 1.21	193 210 172	30 15 15	/ 20 6 14 /	6 1 5	+10 +9 +1	78% 88% 71%	126 128 125	21% 24% 18%	4 3 1	4 2 2	0 +1 -1
koalanoob M80	1.14 1.06 1.09	264 264 243	34 14 20	/ 32 12 20 /	10 8 2	+2 +2 0	78% 94% 67%	166 174 160	15% 19% 12%	8 2 6	7 2 5	+1 0 +1
NiSMO M80	0.96 1.04 1.01	179 143 189	23 8 15	/ 25 9 16 /	24 13 11	-2 -1 -1	88% 94% 83%	116 81 139	39% 47% 37%	0 0 0	2 1 1	-2 -1 -1
zander M80	1.34 0.71 0.96	184 243 161	30 16 14	/ 28 9 19 /	14 5 9	+2 +7 -5	83% 88% 79%	120 157 96	36% 35% 36%	5 3 2	6 2 4	-1 +1 -2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

eeiu

M80

2.10 1.30 1.62

264 334 230

43 22 21

/ 21 4 17 /

11 4 7

+22 +18 +4

78% 94% 67%

173 223 140

38% 50% 28%

2 1 1

2 0 2

0 +1 -1

johnqt

M80

1.51 1.01 1.21

193 210 172

30 15 15

/ 20 6 14 /

6 1 5

+10 +9 +1

78% 88% 71%

126 128 125

21% 24% 18%

4 3 1

4 2 2

0 +1 -1

koalanoob

M80

1.14 1.06 1.09

264 264 243

34 14 20

/ 32 12 20 /

10 8 2

+2 +2 0

78% 94% 67%

166 174 160

15% 19% 12%

8 2 6

7 2 5

+1 0 +1

NiSMO

M80

0.96 1.04 1.01

179 143 189

23 8 15

/ 25 9 16 /

24 13 11

-2 -1 -1

88% 94% 83%

116 81 139

39% 47% 37%

0 0 0

2 1 1

-2 -1 -1

zander

M80

1.34 0.71 0.96

184 243 161

30 16 14

/ 28 9 19 /

14 5 9

+2 +7 -5

83% 88% 79%

120 157 96

36% 35% 36%

5 3 2

6 2 4

-1 +1 -2

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
rubkkoide 9ZG	1.45 0.25 0.97	195 287 59	29 26 3	/ 31 16 15 /	12 10 2	-2 +10 -12	68% 83% 44%	121 176 40	30% 32% 18%	3 3 0	0 0 0	+3 +3 0
deigara 9ZG	0.88 0.82 0.86	189 184 212	24 13 11	/ 34 19 15 /	19 15 4	-10 -6 -4	68% 79% 50%	132 118 153	37% 32% 45%	8 6 2	7 3 4	+1 +3 -2
mizu 9ZG	1.10 0.38 0.81	171 219 112	26 20 6	/ 31 16 15 /	6 5 1	-5 +4 -9	75% 88% 56%	122 150 79	30% 28% 36%	1 0 1	4 0 4	-3 0 -3
david 9ZG	0.84 0.77 0.81	134 115 157	20 11 9	/ 29 15 14 /	14 11 3	-9 -4 -5	65% 75% 50%	87 81 96	26% 21% 33%	2 0 2	1 1 0	+1 -1 +2
Tuli 9ZG	0.78 0.68 0.74	203 191 222	27 16 11	/ 35 19 16 /	6 3 3	-8 -3 -5	75% 79% 69%	147 143 155	25% 24% 25%	7 5 2	7 6 1	0 -1 +1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

rubkkoide

9ZG

1.45 0.25 0.97

195 287 59

29 26 3

/ 31 16 15 /

12 10 2

-2 +10 -12

68% 83% 44%

121 176 40

30% 32% 18%

3 3 0

0 0 0

+3 +3 0

deigara

9ZG

0.88 0.82 0.86

189 184 212

24 13 11

/ 34 19 15 /

19 15 4

-10 -6 -4

68% 79% 50%

132 118 153

37% 32% 45%

8 6 2

7 3 4

+1 +3 -2

mizu

9ZG

1.10 0.38 0.81

171 219 112

26 20 6

/ 31 16 15 /

6 5 1

-5 +4 -9

75% 88% 56%

122 150 79

30% 28% 36%

1 0 1

4 0 4

-3 0 -3

david

9ZG

0.84 0.77 0.81

134 115 157

20 11 9

/ 29 15 14 /

14 11 3

-9 -4 -5

65% 75% 50%

87 81 96

26% 21% 33%

2 0 2

1 1 0

+1 -1 +2

Tuli

9ZG

0.78 0.68 0.74

203 191 222

27 16 11

/ 35 19 16 /

6 3 3

-8 -3 -5

75% 79% 69%

147 143 155

25% 24% 25%

7 5 2

7 6 1

0 -1 +1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
eeiu M80	1.67 2.15 1.23	310 393 235	27 17 10	/ 14 4 10 /	5 3 2	+13 +13 0	70% 91% 50%	198 257 144	41% 50% 30%	2 1 1	2 0 2	0 +1 -1
zander M80	1.24 1.51 0.99	248 264 235	21 11 10	/ 17 6 11 /	12 5 7	+4 +5 -1	83% 82% 83%	162 189 137	42% 38% 46%	4 2 2	3 1 2	+1 +1 0
johnqt M80	1.10 1.76 0.49	152 218 92	14 11 3	/ 12 4 8 /	2 1 1	+2 +7 -5	70% 91% 50%	100 135 68	17% 18% 15%	2 2 0	1 1 0	+1 +1 0
NiSMO M80	0.83 0.76 0.89	121 90 151	10 3 7	/ 14 6 8 /	11 7 4	-4 -3 -1	87% 100% 75%	79 59 98	46% 50% 44%	0 0 0	2 1 1	-2 -1 -1
koalanoob M80	0.66 0.85 0.49	175 206 147	13 8 5	/ 21 9 12 /	5 3 2	-8 -1 -7	70% 91% 50%	112 134 92	13% 14% 12%	2 1 1	5 2 3	-3 -1 -2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

eeiu

M80

1.67 2.15 1.23

310 393 235

27 17 10

/ 14 4 10 /

5 3 2

+13 +13 0

70% 91% 50%

198 257 144

41% 50% 30%

2 1 1

2 0 2

0 +1 -1

zander

M80

1.24 1.51 0.99

248 264 235

21 11 10

/ 17 6 11 /

12 5 7

+4 +5 -1

83% 82% 83%

162 189 137

42% 38% 46%

4 2 2

3 1 2

+1 +1 0

johnqt

M80

1.10 1.76 0.49

152 218 92

14 11 3

/ 12 4 8 /

2 1 1

+2 +7 -5

70% 91% 50%

100 135 68

17% 18% 15%

2 2 0

1 1 0

+1 +1 0

NiSMO

M80

0.83 0.76 0.89

121 90 151

10 3 7

/ 14 6 8 /

11 7 4

-4 -3 -1

87% 100% 75%

79 59 98

46% 50% 44%

0 0 0

2 1 1

-2 -1 -1

koalanoob

M80

0.66 0.85 0.49

175 206 147

13 8 5

/ 21 9 12 /

5 3 2

-8 -1 -7

70% 91% 50%

112 134 92

13% 14% 12%

2 1 1

5 2 3

-3 -1 -2

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
rubkkoide 9ZG	1.14 1.87 0.34	198 319 68	18 16 2	/ 15 5 10 /	8 6 2	+3 +11 -8	74% 92% 55%	130 205 47	30% 31% 25%	2 2 0	0 0 0	+2 +2 0
deigara 9ZG	1.07 1.25 0.87	227 231 224	16 8 8	/ 18 8 10 /	14 11 3	-2 0 -2	70% 83% 55%	151 140 164	37% 34% 40%	5 4 1	2 1 1	+3 +3 0
mizu 9ZG	0.95 1.45 0.41	201 260 138	18 13 5	/ 16 6 10 /	2 1 1	+2 +7 -5	83% 100% 64%	144 188 97	31% 22% 45%	1 0 1	4 0 4	-3 0 -3
david 9ZG	0.71 0.77 0.65	118 106 131	10 4 6	/ 16 7 9 /	8 6 2	-6 -3 -3	65% 75% 55%	75 84 64	23% 24% 23%	1 0 1	0 0 0	+1 0 +1
Tuli 9ZG	0.70 0.72 0.69	208 184 234	16 8 8	/ 20 9 11 /	3 1 2	-4 -1 -3	78% 83% 73%	145 120 173	25% 25% 25%	4 2 2	4 3 1	0 -1 +1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

rubkkoide

9ZG

1.14 1.87 0.34

198 319 68

18 16 2

/ 15 5 10 /

8 6 2

+3 +11 -8

74% 92% 55%

130 205 47

30% 31% 25%

2 2 0

0 0 0

+2 +2 0

deigara

9ZG

1.07 1.25 0.87

227 231 224

16 8 8

/ 18 8 10 /

14 11 3

-2 0 -2

70% 83% 55%

151 140 164

37% 34% 40%

5 4 1

2 1 1

+3 +3 0

mizu

9ZG

0.95 1.45 0.41

201 260 138

18 13 5

/ 16 6 10 /

2 1 1

+2 +7 -5

83% 100% 64%

144 188 97

31% 22% 45%

1 0 1

4 0 4

-3 0 -3

david

9ZG

0.71 0.77 0.65

118 106 131

10 4 6

/ 16 7 9 /

8 6 2

-6 -3 -3

65% 75% 55%

75 84 64

23% 24% 23%

1 0 1

0 0 0

+1 0 +1

Tuli

9ZG

0.70 0.72 0.69

208 184 234

16 8 8

/ 20 9 11 /

3 1 2

-4 -1 -3

78% 83% 73%

145 120 173

25% 25% 25%

4 2 2

4 3 1

0 -1 +1

#29

Joakin

Frags

–

g2 2-0 sentinels

#30

crashhacker1

Frags

–

m80's toughest challenge is the next game

#31

Zeron

Frags

–

ggs

#32

benjy

Frags

–

Guard fans need 9z to make it to the finals 🙏

#33

LATAM_WORST_REGION_BY_FAR

Frags

–

Can someone explain why teams like fusion and 9z play this game professionally? I can’t imagine sitting in front of PC for 8+ hours daily and neglecting family, health, friends, etc only to lose the most impossible rounds. It is very obvious there is an IQ gap when watching LATAM play… if you disagree just pull up a VOD where Fusion play.

#34

LATAM_WORST_REGION_BY_FAR

-1

Frags

–

If these players are getting paid above american minimum wage, there is a problem (especially the duelist players like virty and whatever tf 9z has as theirs)

#37

Slimmyjim21

-1

Frags

–

9z had debts a while ago ., so with the argentina situation i would say 300 to 400$ a month would be really good for them

#39

Aquoravz

Frags

–

It's totally clear that Latam players overheat a lot. This may be because of ranked manners and because this works when facing other Latam teams with less firepower. The 9z guys have good aim, but they throw a lot and peak terribly.

#35

Next1

Frags

–

9z so bad 😹😹

#36

1ucid

Frags

–

so ez

#38

SMK_sss

Frags

–

No update?

#40

deathlyclaws

Frags

–

Ezz for M80

#41

Zeron

-5

Frags

–

ggs 9z reverse sweep david goat

#42

blacklistval

Frags

–

why are we using kayo ult and raze ult there

#43

crashhacker1

Frags

–

lack of discipline on defense. they cant sit still on defense.

#44

destroylonely

Frags

–

eeiu diff

#45

pignoy322

Frags

–

5v3 4v2 2v1 every man advantage lost
U guys better disband and get the real job stupid. Cant believe how can these trash dominated LATAM region lmao

#47

LATAM_WORST_REGION_BY_FAR

Frags

–

exactly lmao latam players get paid to lose every advantage

#48

south_america_best_region

Frags

–

LATAM_WORST_REGION_BY_FAR
Country: United States
Registered: July 8, 2023
Last post: July 8, 2023 at 4:38 PM
Posts: 3

Latam isn't the worst region, OCE, INDIA and JP exists

#49

LATAM_WORST_REGION_BY_FAR

-5

Frags

–

you are trolling right? would put money that latam and 9z are worse and like i said before, it is simply genetics and IQ difference. Natural population in japan and india are smarter than south americans and it also translates to the game.

#50

south_america_best_region

Frags

–

https://www.vlr.gg/167364/zeta-division-vs-leviat-n-champions-tour-2023-lock-in-s-o-paulo-omega-ro16
https://www.vlr.gg/130619/paper-rex-vs-leviat-n-valorant-champions-2022-group-stage-winners-a
https://www.vlr.gg/130630/kr-esports-vs-xerxia-esports-valorant-champions-2022-group-stage-elim-c
try a better bait

#51

peetherium

Frags

–

try a better site to bait on than fucking VLR