EG’s mental

Honestly the Team looks the most improved in their mental aspect imo

First Week of Regular Season:
When they started the season they had played pearl against C9 and choked the map from a 10-3 lead and couldn’t keep their mental game up on fracture following that and lost 2-0

Last Week Of Regular Season:
They played bind against NRG and had a 8-4 up lead, They won Like 1 Round The next half and lost Bind, then absolutely got demolished on the following map also going 2-0

This tourney:
Now they had been ABSOLUTELY DUMPSTERED on Lotus By Fnatic, Still they Kept their Heads High, Won Fracture and Barely Lost Split by a split second.

This team is amazing. I apologize for doubting you all

I think the main difference is the improvement in their attack sides. (maybe also mental aswell)
EG had terrible attack sides before the introduction of demon1.

The reason why the games looked like a "choke" was because they would commonly start defense side.

+-------------------------------------+
| Demon1 impact on atk wr%            |
+----------+------------+-------------+
| Maps:    | PRE-DEMON  | DEMON-ERA   |
+----------+------------+-------------+
| HAVEN    | 23% (5/22) | 53% (30/57) |
+----------+------------+-------------+
| SPLIT    | 18% (2/11) | 48% (36/75) |
+----------+------------+-------------+
| FRACTURE | 50% (5/10) | 69% (61/89) |
+----------+------------+-------------+
| PEARL    | 33% (8/24) | 70% (26/37) |
+----------+------------+-------------+

(pre-demon has very small sample sizes)

Demon-era stats: data
Pre-demon stats: data

capital_d_colon [#2]

I think the main difference is the improvement in their attack sides. (maybe also mental aswell)
EG had terrible attack sides before the introduction of demon1.

The reason why the games looked like a "choke" was because they would commonly start defense side.

+-------------------------------------+
| Demon1 impact on atk wr%            |
+----------+------------+-------------+
| Maps:    | PRE-DEMON  | DEMON-ERA   |
+----------+------------+-------------+
| HAVEN    | 23% (5/22) | 53% (30/57) |
+----------+------------+-------------+
| SPLIT    | 18% (2/11) | 48% (36/75) |
+----------+------------+-------------+
| FRACTURE | 50% (5/10) | 69% (61/89) |
+----------+------------+-------------+
| PEARL    | 33% (8/24) | 70% (26/37) |
+----------+------------+-------------+

(pre-demon has very small sample sizes)

Demon-era stats: data
Pre-demon stats: data

Why not compare the same sample sizes?

Take the First 17 Rounds of Haven, First 9 of Split and First 5 of Fracture? It will show the same picture still and the data wouldn’t look wrongly interpreted

chick [#3]

Why not compare the same sample sizes?

Take the First 17 Rounds of Haven, First 9 of Split and First 5 of Fracture? It will show the same picture still and the data wouldn’t look wrongly interpreted

I mean I could systematically sample the data to make it "fair" but its not really worth it.
The data shows that demon1 in theory improved eg atk sides
You cant say demon1 improved eg atk sides by x% but you can see he has improved it.

I mean you could average the data? for all maps.

+----------------------------+
| Overall average atk wr%    |
+-----------+----------------+
| pre-demon | 34% (28/82)    |
+-----------+----------------+
| demon era | 55% (215/394)  |
+-----------+----------------+