prxs comp is absolutely attrocious, they aren't able to pressure the sightlines long enough to slow down fnc or even secure a safe post plant for FNC.
They have a single smoker in omen, what the fuck kinda attack half did they expect? This ain't ranked, fnc are just waiting for the smokes to run out and then there's practically no more smokes against FNC anymore which means no pressure.
PRX only do good against teams that don't have equal firepower to them. Crazy to think this is what drx lost to
0
PRX terrible comp
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
brahianv [#3]Do you not fucking understand that this not PRX main comp? this a just a comp to make CGRS comfortable.
Dont mine his 70iq. He is most likely bronze3
brahianv [#3]Do you not fucking understand that this not PRX main comp? this a just a comp to make CGRS comfortable.
Regardless they 1. Shouldn't have run solo omen 2. Traded a sentinel for a second controller. At least then it would be much easier to deal with their weakness
dayyaan1 [#6]its almost as if they have a sub idk
I'm talking about their team comp, how would it have been any different with something in the team?
brahianv [#3]Do you not fucking understand that this not PRX main comp? this a just a comp to make CGRS comfortable.
What can you do they need to play with sub 1 week before tournament
ItsHunter [#8]I'm talking about their team comp, how would it have been any different with something in the team?
they wouldn't play gekko?
ItsHunter [#8]I'm talking about their team comp, how would it have been any different with something in the team?
He’d be playing Jett, prob running double duelist
ItsHunter [#8]I'm talking about their team comp, how would it have been any different with something in the team?
oh so you're retarded. got it
ItsHunter [#10]For you idiots talking about how they have a sub
THEY PLAY THE SAME COMP WITH SOMETHING
https://www.vlr.gg/184522/paper-rex-vs-drx-champions-tour-2023-pacific-league-playoffs-gf/?game=131784&tab=overview
How is this same? They run double duelists🗿
ItsHunter [#10]For you idiots talking about how they have a sub
THEY PLAY THE SAME COMP WITH SOMETHING
LMAO u look so dumb, LOOK AT YOU WKWKKWKWKW
ItsHunter [#10]For you idiots talking about how they have a sub
THEY PLAY THE SAME COMP WITH SOMETHING
itshunter and stupidity, best combo
valvenq [#13]they wouldn't play gekko?
Was the issue the gekko? Is that what I was talking about? Did you even read what I was fucking talking about?
Istg vlr user's have to be the dumbest forum users on earth
ItsHunter [#10]For you idiots talking about how they have a sub
THEY PLAY THE SAME COMP WITH SOMETHING
Lord father please help me with these idots
Y'all ever even try to comprehend the original post?
dayyaan1 [#16]oh so you're retarded. got it
No I think you are for not understanding what the issue was even tho I clearly stated it
ItsHunter [#22]Was the issue the gekko? Is that what I was talking about? Did you even read what I was fucking talking about?
Istg vlr user's have to be the dumbest forum users on earth
Clearly you have not been watching prx. Prx are anti-meta. Since you are slow, let me explain slowly. They do not play "normal" comps because of their versatility and ideas centric on aggressive plays. This means that double duelist comps are their go to; meaning that they would've not played gekko if something was here.
brahianv [#3]Do you not fucking understand that this not PRX main comp? this a just a comp to make CGRS comfortable.
Literally 1 agent is different and it isn't an extra controller so the point stands
valvenq [#27]Clearly you have not been watching prx. Prx are anti-meta. Since you are slow, let me explain slowly. They do not play "normal" comps because of their versatility and ideas centric on aggressive plays. This means that double duelist comps are their go to; meaning that they would've not played gekko if something was here.
Double duelist wouldn't solve the issue of not having enough sightline cutoffs. It would pressure CT harder but either way if they're more willing to go double ini rather than double controller then they still need to play it the same way and push deep into CT which they still didn't do.
They're playing it like they have a double controller comp
hell_on_earth [#29]cypher on lotus is still terrible
He's not horrible it's just not a replacement for double controller.
Most teams would much rather deal with no flank util than not enough smokes
ItsHunter [#25]Forum: talks about the issue with a single controller lotus comp
Replies: tries to call op an idiot for mistaking a double duelist comp with a double ini comp
u were being obnoxious and dissing a team without knowing what you’re talking about. acknowledge you were wrong it ain’t hard
ItsHunter [#25]Forum: talks about the issue with a single controller lotus comp
Replies: tries to call op an idiot for mistaking a double duelist comp with a double ini comp
Blud was in the thread calling people stupid and dumb but as soon as he's on the receiving end it's a problem. Make it make sense.
ItsHunter [#30]Double duelist wouldn't solve the issue of not having enough sightline cutoffs. It would pressure CT harder but either way if they're more willing to go double ini rather than double controller then they still need to play it the same way and push deep into CT which they still didn't do.
They're playing it like they have a double controller comp
did you not watch the prx in pacific?
Tashfeen [#32]u were being obnoxious and dissing a team without knowing what you’re talking about. acknowledge you were wrong it ain’t hard
What exactly did I not know? I admit I made a mistake saying it was the EXACT same comp but what I looked for was double smokes. Double duelist still works I guess but looking at the way they were playing, it seemed like they were used to playing double controller. Playing so safe and for post plants would never work with the comp they just ran nor would it work with their double duelist.
I'm guessing they would pressure CT usually which is something they should've done with this comp too and I just didn't see that at all
valvenq [#34]did you not watch the prx in pacific?
Well clearly not no, I looked at the way they played today and assumed they played double controller cause of how passive they were. After I checked their comp and saw double duelist it was even more confusing cause they were playing extremely passive
Manaphy [#33]Blud was in the thread calling people stupid and dumb but as soon as he's on the receiving end it's a problem. Make it make sense.
How about provide some facts and use some logic to prove your point like some of the ppl in the thread are doing rather than pick at holes in the statement that doesn't disprove the main point in any way
PeterGriffin [#38]bro FNC cant even get a single map with sub in reykjavik.
I don't get what you're point is.
They were playing with 2 subs and they were playing horribly, idk why you brought that up as if I had some sort of bias for them playing with a sub and not prx.
Playing with a sub doesn't excuse your mistakes, it's simply a reason for them
ItsHunter [#39]I don't get what you're point is.
They were playing with 2 subs and they were playing horribly, idk why you brought that up as if I had some sort of bias for them playing with a sub and not prx.
Playing with a sub doesn't excuse your mistakes, it's simply a reason for them
im the one who dont get your point.
my point is they dont get enough practice with CGRS and they are using new comp agent. So, they arent playing at their comfort zone.
And as long as i remember h1ber(sub) was their best player at the time. so you can see the problem might be chemistry or undeveloped strat.
ItsHunter [#36]Well clearly not no, I looked at the way they played today and assumed they played double controller cause of how passive they were. After I checked their comp and saw double duelist it was even more confusing cause they were playing extremely passive
then stfu
either watch the pacific vods then make your own comment or just stfu
Discord