It would be nice to have some sort of acronym/tag to put on the start of your thread if you are posting an essay on a specific valorant topic. I actually enjoy reading breakdown of team strats, discussion on roster building, etc.
It would be nice to be able to identify from the title if the poster is a autistic nerd like me
The viability of double duelist will depend on APAC's performance at Tokyo. APAC teams have been known to favor double duelist compositions, and if they are able to find success with this strategy at Tokyo, it could lead to a resurgence of double duelist in the global meta. However, if APAC teams struggle with double duelist, it could be seen as a sign that the strategy is no longer viable at the highest level.
Double duelist compositions are characterized by the use of two duelist agents, such as Jett and Reyna. Duelists are typically the most aggressive agents in the game, and they are equipped with abilities that allow them to take duels and entry sites. This can be a very effective strategy, as it allows teams to quickly take control of sites and overwhelm the enemy team.
However, double duelist compositions can also be very risky. If the duelists are not able to get kills, they can leave their team in a vulnerable position. Additionally, double duelist compositions can be difficult to coordinate, as both duelists need to be on the same page in order to be effective.
The viability of double duelist compositions has been a topic of debate in the VALORANT community for some time. Some players believe that double duelist is the best way to play the game, while others believe that it is a risky strategy that is not worth the potential rewards. The performance of APAC teams at Tokyo will likely have a major impact on the global meta, and it will be interesting to see if double duelist makes a comeback.
Discord