Furious Gaming vs. Optix | Challengers League LATAM South FiRe: Split 2 | Regular Phase | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
mta FG	1.34 1.10 1.58	305 283 329	35 14 21	/ 23 13 10 /	6 6 0	+12 +1 +11	72% 63% 81%	188 190 186	20% 20% 19%	6 2 4	7 4 3	-1 -2 +1
Puleule FG	1.34 1.26 1.43	246 203 290	28 12 16	/ 20 10 10 /	5 0 5	+8 +2 +6	69% 63% 75%	177 150 203	24% 20% 28%	5 2 3	2 1 1	+3 +1 +2
UNNSTO FG	1.25 1.21 1.29	272 278 267	31 16 15	/ 25 14 11 /	5 2 3	+6 +2 +4	75% 88% 63%	179 177 181	41% 30% 58%	6 4 2	0 0 0	+6 +4 +2
HANLING FG	0.78 0.57 1.00	148 101 195	14 4 10	/ 24 13 11 /	17 10 7	-10 -9 -1	81% 75% 88%	114 81 147	33% 27% 39%	0 0 0	1 0 1	-1 0 -1
olzerr FG	0.74 0.64 0.85	129 114 145	12 6 6	/ 22 12 10 /	26 9 17	-10 -6 -4	78% 63% 94%	88 75 101	38% 38% 39%	1 0 1	4 3 1	-3 -3 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

mta

1.34 1.10 1.58

305 283 329

35 14 21

/ 23 13 10 /

6 6 0

+12 +1 +11

72% 63% 81%

188 190 186

20% 20% 19%

6 2 4

7 4 3

-1 -2 +1

Puleule

1.34 1.26 1.43

246 203 290

28 12 16

/ 20 10 10 /

5 0 5

+8 +2 +6

69% 63% 75%

177 150 203

24% 20% 28%

5 2 3

2 1 1

+3 +1 +2

UNNSTO

1.25 1.21 1.29

272 278 267

31 16 15

/ 25 14 11 /

5 2 3

+6 +2 +4

75% 88% 63%

179 177 181

41% 30% 58%

6 4 2

0 0 0

+6 +4 +2

HANLING

0.78 0.57 1.00

148 101 195

14 4 10

/ 24 13 11 /

17 10 7

-10 -9 -1

81% 75% 88%

114 81 147

33% 27% 39%

0 0 0

1 0 1

-1 0 -1

olzerr

0.74 0.64 0.85

129 114 145

12 6 6

/ 22 12 10 /

26 9 17

-10 -6 -4

78% 63% 94%

88 75 101

38% 38% 39%

1 0 1

4 3 1

-3 -3 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
gio MOX	1.23 0.78 1.67	246 167 326	28 9 19	/ 22 13 9 /	16 7 9	+6 -4 +10	81% 69% 94%	161 113 210	18% 18% 18%	1 0 1	0 0 0	+1 0 +1
Tio MOX	1.17 1.18 1.16	203 219 187	23 13 10	/ 21 12 9 /	10 5 5	+2 +1 +1	69% 69% 69%	136 148 124	22% 25% 19%	1 0 1	1 0 1	0 0 0
Fross MOX	1.16 1.20 1.12	228 262 196	27 15 12	/ 23 14 9 /	9 4 5	+4 +1 +3	75% 75% 75%	143 168 118	25% 28% 21%	4 2 2	5 2 3	-1 0 -1
D1E MOX	0.85 0.78 0.93	176 165 188	19 8 11	/ 25 14 11 /	7 4 3	-6 -6 0	78% 75% 81%	127 126 128	29% 22% 34%	3 2 1	1 1 0	+2 +1 +1
ganter MOX	0.45 0.23 0.67	157 116 198	17 7 10	/ 29 15 14 /	7 1 6	-12 -8 -4	59% 63% 56%	97 70 125	32% 40% 28%	5 2 3	11 7 4	-6 -5 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

gio

MOX

1.23 0.78 1.67

246 167 326

28 9 19

/ 22 13 9 /

16 7 9

+6 -4 +10

81% 69% 94%

161 113 210

18% 18% 18%

1 0 1

0 0 0

+1 0 +1

Tio

MOX

1.17 1.18 1.16

203 219 187

23 13 10

/ 21 12 9 /

10 5 5

+2 +1 +1

69% 69% 69%

136 148 124

22% 25% 19%

1 0 1

0 0 0

Fross

MOX

1.16 1.20 1.12

228 262 196

27 15 12

/ 23 14 9 /

9 4 5

+4 +1 +3

75% 75% 75%

143 168 118

25% 28% 21%

4 2 2

5 2 3

-1 0 -1

D1E

MOX

0.85 0.78 0.93

176 165 188

19 8 11

/ 25 14 11 /

7 4 3

-6 -6 0

78% 75% 81%

127 126 128

29% 22% 34%

3 2 1

1 1 0

+2 +1 +1

ganter

MOX

0.45 0.23 0.67

157 116 198

17 7 10

/ 29 15 14 /

7 1 6

-12 -8 -4

59% 63% 56%

97 70 125

32% 40% 28%

5 2 3

11 7 4

-6 -5 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
mta FG	1.57 1.57 1.57	355 386 321	76 39 37	/ 45 24 21 /	15 11 4	+31 +15 +16	77% 77% 77%	221 247 195	23% 23% 23%	13 7 6	10 6 4	+3 +1 +2
UNNSTO FG	1.34 1.00 1.17	230 263 200	50 29 21	/ 43 21 22 /	20 12 8	+7 +8 -1	71% 84% 58%	151 164 138	42% 35% 52%	9 6 3	2 0 2	+7 +6 +1
Czewick FG	1.14 1.03 1.09	208 214 202	23 11 12	/ 18 7 11 /	4 3 1	+5 +4 +1	70% 80% 60%	138 150 126	28% 31% 26%	5 1 4	5 2 3	0 -1 +1
Puleule FG	1.02 0.98 1.00	173 160 191	38 19 19	/ 39 18 21 /	10 3 7	-1 +1 -2	65% 68% 61%	128 118 137	25% 23% 26%	5 2 3	4 2 2	+1 0 +1
HANLING FG	0.76 0.88 0.82	143 123 164	29 12 17	/ 45 23 22 /	32 23 9	-16 -11 -5	73% 81% 65%	101 82 120	35% 31% 39%	2 1 1	2 1 1	0 0 0
olzerr FG	0.64 0.85 0.74	129 114 145	12 6 6	/ 22 12 10 /	26 9 17	-10 -6 -4	78% 63% 94%	88 75 101	38% 38% 39%	1 0 1	4 3 1	-3 -3 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

mta

1.57 1.57 1.57

355 386 321

76 39 37

/ 45 24 21 /

15 11 4

+31 +15 +16

77% 77% 77%

221 247 195

23% 23% 23%

13 7 6

10 6 4

+3 +1 +2

UNNSTO

1.34 1.00 1.17

230 263 200

50 29 21

/ 43 21 22 /

20 12 8

+7 +8 -1

71% 84% 58%

151 164 138

42% 35% 52%

9 6 3

2 0 2

+7 +6 +1

Czewick

1.14 1.03 1.09

208 214 202

23 11 12

/ 18 7 11 /

4 3 1

+5 +4 +1

70% 80% 60%

138 150 126

28% 31% 26%

5 1 4

5 2 3

0 -1 +1

Puleule

1.02 0.98 1.00

173 160 191

38 19 19

/ 39 18 21 /

10 3 7

-1 +1 -2

65% 68% 61%

128 118 137

25% 23% 26%

5 2 3

4 2 2

+1 0 +1

HANLING

0.76 0.88 0.82

143 123 164

29 12 17

/ 45 23 22 /

32 23 9

-16 -11 -5

73% 81% 65%

101 82 120

35% 31% 39%

2 1 1

0 0 0

olzerr

0.64 0.85 0.74

129 114 145

12 6 6

/ 22 12 10 /

26 9 17

-10 -6 -4

78% 63% 94%

88 75 101

38% 38% 39%

1 0 1

4 3 1

-3 -3 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Fross MOX	1.40 1.02 1.21	246 289 201	53 31 22	/ 44 22 22 /	27 13 14	+9 +9 0	76% 81% 71%	154 183 126	26% 28% 24%	6 3 3	6 2 4	0 +1 -1
Tio MOX	0.97 1.22 1.10	191 157 226	41 18 23	/ 40 20 20 /	15 6 9	+1 -2 +3	65% 61% 68%	128 114 142	18% 22% 15%	3 0 3	2 1 1	+1 -1 +2
gio MOX	0.83 1.20 1.01	197 156 241	44 17 27	/ 42 21 21 /	25 14 11	+2 -4 +6	71% 65% 77%	127 104 151	22% 23% 22%	3 1 2	4 2 2	-1 -1 0
D1E MOX	0.94 0.78 0.86	181 192 171	37 20 17	/ 49 24 25 /	16 6 10	-12 -4 -8	69% 71% 68%	131 139 122	30% 29% 31%	5 4 1	4 2 2	+1 +2 -1
ganter MOX	0.72 0.56 0.64	181 194 167	37 21 16	/ 53 25 28 /	14 7 7	-16 -4 -12	66% 71% 61%	123 138 107	27% 30% 23%	10 5 5	19 11 8	-9 -6 -3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Fross

MOX

1.40 1.02 1.21

246 289 201

53 31 22

/ 44 22 22 /

27 13 14

+9 +9 0

76% 81% 71%

154 183 126

26% 28% 24%

6 3 3

6 2 4

0 +1 -1

Tio

MOX

0.97 1.22 1.10

191 157 226

41 18 23

/ 40 20 20 /

15 6 9

+1 -2 +3

65% 61% 68%

128 114 142

18% 22% 15%

3 0 3

2 1 1

+1 -1 +2

gio

MOX

0.83 1.20 1.01

197 156 241

44 17 27

/ 42 21 21 /

25 14 11

+2 -4 +6

71% 65% 77%

127 104 151

22% 23% 22%

3 1 2

4 2 2

-1 -1 0

D1E

MOX

0.94 0.78 0.86

181 192 171

37 20 17

/ 49 24 25 /

16 6 10

-12 -4 -8

69% 71% 68%

131 139 122

30% 29% 31%

5 4 1

4 2 2

+1 +2 -1

ganter

MOX

0.72 0.56 0.64

181 194 167

37 21 16

/ 53 25 28 /

14 7 7

-16 -4 -12

66% 71% 61%

123 138 107

27% 30% 23%

10 5 5

19 11 8

-9 -6 -3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
mta FG	1.81 2.06 1.56	404 496 313	41 25 16	/ 22 11 11 /	9 5 4	+19 +14 +5	83% 93% 73%	257 309 205	25% 25% 26%	7 5 2	3 2 1	+4 +3 +1
Czewick FG	1.09 1.14 1.03	208 214 202	23 11 12	/ 18 7 11 /	4 3 1	+5 +4 +1	70% 80% 60%	138 150 126	28% 31% 26%	5 1 4	5 2 3	0 -1 +1
UNNSTO FG	1.09 1.49 0.68	188 248 129	19 13 6	/ 18 7 11 /	15 10 5	+1 +6 -5	67% 80% 53%	121 150 92	44% 44% 44%	3 2 1	2 0 2	+1 +2 -1
HANLING FG	0.86 0.97 0.75	138 146 130	15 8 7	/ 21 10 11 /	15 13 2	-6 -2 -4	63% 87% 40%	88 84 91	38% 38% 39%	2 1 1	1 1 0	+1 0 +1
Puleule FG	0.63 0.77 0.50	99 113 86	10 7 3	/ 19 8 11 /	5 3 2	-9 -1 -8	60% 73% 47%	76 84 67	27% 33% 21%	0 0 0	2 1 1	-2 -1 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

mta

1.81 2.06 1.56

404 496 313

41 25 16

/ 22 11 11 /

9 5 4

+19 +14 +5

83% 93% 73%

257 309 205

25% 25% 26%

7 5 2

3 2 1

+4 +3 +1

Czewick

1.09 1.14 1.03

208 214 202

23 11 12

/ 18 7 11 /

4 3 1

+5 +4 +1

70% 80% 60%

138 150 126

28% 31% 26%

5 1 4

5 2 3

0 -1 +1

UNNSTO

1.09 1.49 0.68

188 248 129

19 13 6

/ 18 7 11 /

15 10 5

+1 +6 -5

67% 80% 53%

121 150 92

44% 44% 44%

3 2 1

2 0 2

+1 +2 -1

HANLING

0.86 0.97 0.75

138 146 130

15 8 7

/ 21 10 11 /

15 13 2

-6 -2 -4

63% 87% 40%

88 84 91

38% 38% 39%

2 1 1

1 1 0

+1 0 +1

Puleule

0.63 0.77 0.50

99 113 86

10 7 3

/ 19 8 11 /

5 3 2

-9 -1 -8

60% 73% 47%

76 84 67

27% 33% 21%

0 0 0

2 1 1

-2 -1 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Fross MOX	1.26 1.61 0.91	263 319 208	26 16 10	/ 21 8 13 /	18 9 9	+5 +8 -3	77% 87% 67%	167 199 134	28% 28% 29%	2 1 1	1 0 1	+1 +1 0
Tio MOX	1.02 0.75 1.29	179 91 267	18 5 13	/ 19 8 11 /	5 1 4	-1 -3 +2	60% 53% 67%	120 78 162	13% 17% 12%	2 0 2	1 1 0	+1 -1 +2
D1E MOX	0.87 1.13 0.61	186 221 153	18 12 6	/ 24 10 14 /	9 2 7	-6 +2 -8	60% 67% 53%	135 153 116	31% 37% 26%	2 2 0	3 1 2	-1 +1 -2
ganter MOX	0.85 1.25 0.44	205 277 133	20 14 6	/ 24 10 14 /	7 6 1	-4 +4 -8	73% 80% 67%	149 211 88	23% 27% 17%	5 3 2	8 4 4	-3 -1 -2
gio MOX	0.79 0.87 0.70	147 145 151	16 8 8	/ 20 8 12 /	9 7 2	-4 0 -4	60% 60% 60%	91 94 88	33% 30% 38%	2 1 1	4 2 2	-2 -1 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Fross

MOX

1.26 1.61 0.91

263 319 208

26 16 10

/ 21 8 13 /

18 9 9

+5 +8 -3

77% 87% 67%

167 199 134

28% 28% 29%

2 1 1

1 0 1

+1 +1 0

Tio

MOX

1.02 0.75 1.29

179 91 267

18 5 13

/ 19 8 11 /

5 1 4

-1 -3 +2

60% 53% 67%

120 78 162

13% 17% 12%

2 0 2

1 1 0

+1 -1 +2

D1E

MOX

0.87 1.13 0.61

186 221 153

18 12 6

/ 24 10 14 /

9 2 7

-6 +2 -8

60% 67% 53%

135 153 116

31% 37% 26%

2 2 0

3 1 2

-1 +1 -2

ganter

MOX

0.85 1.25 0.44

205 277 133

20 14 6

/ 24 10 14 /

7 6 1

-4 +4 -8

73% 80% 67%

149 211 88

23% 27% 17%

5 3 2

8 4 4

-3 -1 -2

gio

MOX

0.79 0.87 0.70

147 145 151

16 8 8

/ 20 8 12 /

9 7 2

-4 0 -4

60% 60% 60%

91 94 88

33% 30% 38%

2 1 1

4 2 2

-2 -1 -1

KlobotXXL

-8

Frags

–

latam just cringe to watch, u dont know which one has mafia on their side

uveEse

Frags

–

i never seen a puerto rico team in vlr bro XD

KeeganXXL

-1

Frags

–

lmao latam as always

HAON1HAO

Frags

–

i want wash my eyes if optix doing this not for fix its terrible asf

koromast

Frags

–

i dont genuinely understand how you think they are supposed to beat a guy who fragged 80 on 2 maps even if you are better on paper as a team tbh. mta today was looking like he is next up.

DosuKinuta

Frags

–

latam teams when they saw big odds always throw hahaha such a shitshow

fmadwerdna

Frags

–

LMFAO actually the funniest match on vlr history. EVERYONE HAS 40 DEATHS. history has been made with latam fix abilities!

koromast

Frags

–

people wondering how mox lost this and then you see mta +31