Should TR and CIS get a seperate slot?? For me its a yes!
A team that dominates its region have not added nothing new to itself. So ClS and TR spots must be united to improve their performance, game sense and tactical intelligence. There are already one or two teams that step front within the individual regions. For this reason, my opinion, there is no competitive spirit in this regions and the results of matches are almost certain. ln addition, the fact that regional teams are constantly playing within themselves creates problems when they face EU teams, i think
Taspar [#4]A team that dominates its region have not added nothing new to itself. So ClS and TR spots must be united to improve their performance, game sense and tactical intelligence. There are already one or two teams that step front within the individual regions. For this reason, my opinion, there is no competitive spirit in this regions and the results of matches are almost certain. ln addition, the fact that regional teams are constantly playing within themselves creates problems when they face EU teams, i think
agreed
cryyBAE [#11]There is no need for JP have 2 slots ...
That and SEA 2 slots are ones that bothers me the most.
I think the champions format is good, at least for now until we get a true picture of the regions once LANs become normal.
3NA (including last chance), 3EUMA (Including last chance), 2BR, 2SEA, 1KR, 1JP, 1LATM, 1Asia Last chance, 1SA Last chance, 1 Masters 3 winner. It can be argued NA and especially EUMA with the size deserve another spot. But thankfully the region who wins Maters 3 gets another slot. So EU or NA get that addition slot if they win Masters 3. Also allows the rare chance for a JP or KR team to win, and bring in another team that may not get the playerbase.