They have insane players, they look to be meshing well, clutches are there
What even is the problem here, why are they so bad? Mike not a good coach or stellar not a good IGL?
RayzerGH [#4]Every round they lose, it's because they do some very bizarre stuff, it reminds me a little of FURIA
There was a round where derrek start spaming in the corner with his odin (to kill the trade guy), and not went back after he got an kill, and then he died and lost the bomb.
RayzerGH [#4]Every round they lose, it's because they do some very bizarre stuff, it reminds me a little of FURIA
There was a round where derrek start spaming in the corner with his odin (to kill the trade guy), and not went back after he got an kill, and then he died and lost the bomb.
100T looked like a bunch of bots. Not "bots" but robots. They didn't do many things wrong, but they felt like they couldn't evolve. It took MANY, MANY mistakes by Sentinels for it to be close. I want to reiterate the MANY problems. it felt like Sen threw 1 of every 3 rounds. For Gods sake, Deph didn't buy a gun on the last round of Fracture. It's weird how 100T didn't do bad, but it felt like they'll never be better than this form. It's like they're just stuck a step behind the top tier in AM.
b0learr [#3]lose by two rounds, "why are they so bad"
????????????
that being said its just fixable micro mistakes
Did you see how Sentinels played? Were you at all impressed by 100T? If Sen fix their micro mistakes its a 13-5 on each map. If 100T fix their micro mistakes against the same Sen it's still a 13-10.
Wronghand [#8]Did you see how Sentinels played? Were you at all impressed by 100T? If Sen fix their micro mistakes its a 13-5 on each map. If 100T fix their micro mistakes against the same Sen it's still a 13-10.
That logic doesn’t make sense. It was a close game already, both teams had good rounds and bad rounds. Both are good teams, good teams lose rounds sometimes. Who are you to predict what a match score would be like if an imaginary scenario happens?
The problem is that they are insane players but they are not as insane as the sen roster.Sen has 4 raid boss level players individually.They still have a lot of work to do to play well as a team while 100t despite having good team work lost.Why?it is because individually they are not that crazy.None of them have proven to be individually crazy against good teams.That's why.If sen can start meshing well together they would be crazy considering how good every player is individually.
Docta [#9]That logic doesn’t make sense. It was a close game already, both teams had good rounds and bad rounds. Both are good teams, good teams lose rounds sometimes. Who are you to predict what a match score would be like if an imaginary scenario happens?
hes saying that sen played really bad and 100t are just that worse of a team that if both teams fixed all the mistakes sen would still win I think, idk his delusions are hard to interpret maybe just ignore
The only problem I could see with 100T is they're not there in terms of individual form yet. Look at how Tenz zekken and Sacy were shooting yesterday. They had an ungodly number of 3Ks and 4Ks. We just need Cryo and derrek to step up their shooting. The planning and strategy looked fire from 100T. Their gameplan and executions looked better than SEN's too