Ascent

Anyone feel like this map is too defender sided? Almost as CT as split in pro play

It is a lot defender sided, but to be fair, it is doable. M80 are just pretty poorly coordinated and have poor post plants.

I fucking hate this map. They need to make some changes

I FUCKING HATE THIS MAP ...I HATED IT FROM THE BEGINNING

SAMPV6 [#2]

It is a lot defender sided, but to be fair, it is doable. M80 are just pretty poorly coordinated and have poor post plants.

I just feel like B lane is too hard to take and if you 5 man rush A main you're actually trolling. It is doable but I have seen too many 2-10 comeback or something alone the line

Like #2 said, it is doable. M80's attack is just that bad

Ascent is sooooooo boring.
Even tho its a ct sided map, bind was just a poorly designed map so it made sense for ascent to stay. Idk why riot removed breeze tho.

BrotherMan [#7]

Ascent is sooooooo boring.
Even tho its a ct sided map, bind was just a poorly designed map so it made sense for ascent to stay. Idk why riot removed breeze tho.

breeze was even more poorly designed than bind. thats why.

gamr [#8]

breeze was even more poorly designed than bind. thats why.

I dont think so. Bind was so poorly designed, rotations were so so predictable cause there was no mid. Also the map was too small. Breeze on the other hand had a mid, and halls too. It was a fairly sized map that made things more interesting

gamr [#8]

breeze was even more poorly designed than bind. thats why.

Only agree on hall very poorly design cuz A split is often very strong. But the map literally is only about 60% CT to make the game at least somewhat fun to watch and not always a landslide to see side swap only to find out to be a even bigger landslide

balanced imo

yea, esp in ranked when people got weak mental. you start on atk? well gg