TL Sliggy once said
"The best way to know if a player is a good duelist is RAZE. There is a BIG difference between a good duelist and a jett abuser
If he is a good duelist, he needs to be good with raze."
Thoughts on this?
It is a good argument but it invalidates itself most of the time.
Aspas has an average Raze but has an exceptional Jett.
Something, despite playing in Tier 2, also has an average Raze and an absurd Jett and both are good duelists.
Mwzera has a great Raze and was a duelist his first year, but soon switched roles so ¯¯(ツ)_/¯
The argument might make more sense using Neon than Raze, but I still don't like it much.
nerKye [#8]It is a good argument but it invalidates itself most of the time.
Aspas has an average Raze but has an exceptional Jett.
Something, despite playing in Tier 2, also has an average Raze and an absurd Jett and both are good duelists.
Mwzera has a great Raze and was a duelist his first year, but soon switched roles so ¯¯(ツ)_/¯The argument might make more sense using Neon than Raze, but I still don't like it much.
The argument is perfect because mwzera is the best raze and the best player ever. All other duelists suck