fnatic 2-0
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.80 1.69 1.95 | 380 379 382 | 27 16 11 | / 14 10 4 / | 11 4 7 | +13 +6 +7 | 90% 83% 100% | 217 251 167 | 36% 33% 44% | 4 2 2 | 2 2 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.21 0.92 1.64 | 204 179 243 | 15 7 8 | / 12 9 3 / | 9 6 3 | +3 -2 +5 | 75% 58% 100% | 102 111 89 | 38% 47% 27% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.14 1.34 0.85 | 195 255 107 | 16 12 4 | / 11 9 2 / | 5 4 1 | +5 +3 +2 | 75% 75% 75% | 110 144 59 | 23% 30% 8% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.95 1.15 0.65 | 192 201 180 | 12 8 4 | / 15 8 7 / | 7 4 3 | -3 0 -3 | 80% 75% 88% | 129 152 95 | 12% 11% 17% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.78 0.64 0.99 | 168 122 239 | 12 5 7 | / 14 8 6 / | 5 2 3 | -2 -3 +1 | 65% 58% 75% | 92 71 123 | 16% 14% 19% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.01 0.24 1.52 | 246 57 373 | 16 1 15 | / 15 6 9 / | 3 2 1 | +1 -5 +6 | 75% 75% 75% | 168 42 253 | 31% 13% 34% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.00 1.24 0.84 | 238 338 172 | 16 10 6 | / 16 7 9 / | 7 0 7 | 0 +3 -3 | 80% 75% 83% | 125 140 115 | 27% 20% 33% | 4 3 1 | 1 0 1 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
0.85 0.80 0.89 | 206 205 208 | 15 6 9 | / 17 7 10 / | 2 0 2 | -2 -1 -1 | 70% 50% 83% | 119 115 121 | 32% 75% 21% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.61 0.20 0.89 | 175 87 235 | 10 1 9 | / 17 7 10 / | 7 3 4 | -7 -6 -1 | 75% 63% 83% | 118 47 165 | 34% 0% 53% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.43 0.44 0.42 | 144 186 117 | 9 6 3 | / 17 7 10 / | 3 1 2 | -8 -1 -7 | 60% 75% 50% | 96 113 85 | 15% 14% 17% | 4 0 4 | 4 1 3 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.60 1.95 1.74 | 379 377 383 | 53 31 22 | / 27 20 7 / | 14 7 7 | +26 +11 +15 | 90% 83% 100% | 201 228 162 | 30% 28% 32% | 12 6 6 | 4 3 1 | +8 +3 +5 | |
|
1.26 1.54 1.37 | 243 223 275 | 35 18 17 | / 23 16 7 / | 18 12 6 | +12 +2 +10 | 83% 75% 94% | 131 134 127 | 27% 30% 23% | 2 2 0 | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
1.22 0.75 1.03 | 186 239 107 | 25 19 6 | / 24 18 6 / | 16 11 5 | +1 +1 0 | 70% 71% 69% | 115 150 63 | 14% 17% 4% | 0 0 0 | 4 4 0 | -4 -4 0 | |
|
0.68 1.14 0.86 | 151 118 200 | 23 11 12 | / 25 16 9 / | 12 4 8 | -2 -5 +3 | 65% 58% 75% | 84 78 92 | 20% 19% 21% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.70 0.98 0.81 | 191 154 248 | 24 12 12 | / 31 19 12 / | 10 4 6 | -7 -7 0 | 65% 58% 75% | 124 110 145 | 12% 11% 13% | 5 2 3 | 5 4 1 | 0 -2 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.73 1.06 0.93 | 247 207 275 | 33 12 21 | / 33 13 20 / | 7 3 4 | 0 -1 +1 | 65% 63% 67% | 147 112 170 | 19% 26% 16% | 8 0 8 | 6 2 4 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
1.19 0.74 0.92 | 210 292 155 | 29 16 13 | / 31 13 18 / | 10 0 10 | -2 +3 -5 | 65% 56% 71% | 118 148 97 | 25% 26% 23% | 4 3 1 | 3 0 3 | +1 +3 -2 | |
|
0.34 1.06 0.77 | 162 76 220 | 20 4 16 | / 31 14 17 / | 16 4 12 | -11 -10 -1 | 73% 56% 83% | 109 39 155 | 33% 13% 40% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.65 0.81 0.74 | 185 167 198 | 26 9 17 | / 33 14 19 / | 4 1 3 | -7 -5 -2 | 63% 50% 71% | 104 89 115 | 24% 29% 22% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.13 1.04 0.62 | 174 62 250 | 22 2 20 | / 32 15 17 / | 6 4 2 | -10 -13 +3 | 63% 50% 71% | 118 35 173 | 31% 14% 34% | 4 1 3 | 8 7 1 | -4 -6 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.68 1.50 1.96 | 378 374 384 | 26 15 11 | / 13 10 3 / | 3 3 0 | +13 +5 +8 | 90% 83% 100% | 186 204 158 | 24% 24% 22% | 8 4 4 | 2 1 1 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
1.54 1.60 1.45 | 282 266 308 | 20 11 9 | / 11 7 4 / | 9 6 3 | +9 +4 +5 | 90% 92% 88% | 161 157 165 | 21% 21% 21% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.95 0.72 1.29 | 133 114 161 | 11 6 5 | / 11 8 3 / | 7 2 5 | 0 -2 +2 | 65% 58% 75% | 75 85 61 | 27% 27% 29% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.92 1.09 0.66 | 176 223 107 | 9 7 2 | / 13 9 4 / | 11 7 4 | -4 -2 -2 | 65% 67% 63% | 121 157 68 | 5% 6% 0% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.67 0.24 1.31 | 189 106 316 | 12 4 8 | / 16 11 5 / | 3 0 3 | -4 -7 +3 | 50% 42% 63% | 119 68 195 | 11% 13% 11% | 4 1 3 | 2 2 0 | +2 -1 +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.43 1.02 1.71 | 350 229 432 | 24 6 18 | / 16 6 10 / | 4 2 2 | +8 0 +8 | 70% 50% 83% | 198 111 256 | 21% 44% 16% | 4 0 4 | 2 1 1 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.93 0.47 1.23 | 149 65 205 | 10 3 7 | / 14 7 7 / | 9 1 8 | -4 -4 0 | 70% 50% 83% | 99 31 145 | 32% 40% 31% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.84 1.13 0.64 | 181 246 139 | 13 6 7 | / 15 6 9 / | 3 0 3 | -2 0 -2 | 50% 38% 58% | 110 157 79 | 23% 32% 14% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.63 0.49 0.73 | 164 130 188 | 11 3 8 | / 16 7 9 / | 2 1 1 | -5 -4 -1 | 55% 50% 58% | 90 63 108 | 17% 6% 24% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.24 0.01 0.56 | 102 66 128 | 6 1 5 | / 17 9 8 / | 3 2 1 | -11 -8 -3 | 50% 25% 67% | 67 28 93 | 30% 17% 35% | 2 1 1 | 6 5 1 | -4 -4 0 |
FNC 2-0 likely. FNC 2-1 second most likely, if OXG show up on icebox|ascent. Other scorelines unlikely, but possible if FNC simply have an off-day & OXG aim diff.
Both teams favor bind, the problem is FNC are the best bind team in EU & OXG have never ran Viper on it. Split is going to be instaban for FNC, considering it's another potential strength for OXG & weakness for FNC. OXG prob bans haven; if they for some reason don't do so, FNC favored.
The two dangerous maps are icebox and ascent. OXG had a close game with FUT on icebox + they won vs BBL on icebox in challengers 1. They also run the viper comp there. Fnatic's icebox has been a little shaky, both wins over Liquid & Vitality were close & they got massacred by Acend. They seem to generally struggle against Reyna there, which OXG can definitely pull out.
Same story on ascent, close game with FUT, win vs BBL. Though with this one, I would definitely give the edge to FNC considering they are also formidable on this map, it seems to have become almost a second staple for them alongside bind.
Unless OXG reworked their playstyle to incorporate Astra & Viper or FNC have an off-day, it's difficult to see FNC losing. It has been two weeks since an official game from OXG, so it is likely that they have reworked some aspects, but may be shaky incorporating them in official.
Who knows maybe OXG have been praccing Haven offline and pull it out after bind/ascent ban. Definitely potential for OXG; FNC are just a tough first opponent with all the momentum they have & how favorable the bans would be for them.
GL to both teams. No doubt in my mind, that OXG have studied the crap out of FNC. Let's see what they will bring.
Edit: They picked both Split and Haven. Let's see how this goes.
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#36]FNC 2-0 likely. FNC 2-1 second most likely, if OXG show up on icebox|ascent. Other scorelines unlikely, but possible if FNC simply have an off-day & OXG aim diff.
Both teams favor bind, the problem is FNC are the best bind team in EU & OXG have never ran Viper on it. Split is going to be instaban for FNC, considering it's another potential strength for OXG & weakness for FNC. OXG prob bans haven; if they for some reason don't do so, FNC favored.
The two dangerous maps are icebox and ascent. OXG had a close game with FUT on icebox + they won vs BBL on icebox in challengers 1. They also run the viper comp there. Fnatic's icebox has been a little shaky, both wins over Liquid & Vitality were close & they got massacred by Acend. They seem to generally struggle against Reyna there, which OXG can definitely pull out.
Same story on ascent, close game with FUT, win vs BBL. Though with this one, I would definitely give the edge to FNC considering they are also formidable on this map, it seems to have become almost a second staple for them alongside bind.
Unless OXG reworked their playstyle to incorporate Astra & Viper or FNC have an off-day, it's difficult to see FNC losing. It has been two weeks since an official game from OXG, so it is likely that they have reworked some aspects, but may be shaky incorporating them in official.
Who knows maybe OXG have been praccing Haven offline and pull it out after bind/ascent ban. Definitely potential for OXG; FNC are just a tough first opponent with all the momentum they have & how favorable the bans would be for them.
GL to both teams. No doubt in my mind, that OXG have studied the crap out of FNC. Let's see what they will bring.
Edit: They picked both Split and Haven. Let's see how this goes.
nice write up, thx
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#36]FNC 2-0 likely. FNC 2-1 second most likely, if OXG show up on icebox|ascent. Other scorelines unlikely, but possible if FNC simply have an off-day & OXG aim diff.
Both teams favor bind, the problem is FNC are the best bind team in EU & OXG have never ran Viper on it. Split is going to be instaban for FNC, considering it's another potential strength for OXG & weakness for FNC. OXG prob bans haven; if they for some reason don't do so, FNC favored.
The two dangerous maps are icebox and ascent. OXG had a close game with FUT on icebox + they won vs BBL on icebox in challengers 1. They also run the viper comp there. Fnatic's icebox has been a little shaky, both wins over Liquid & Vitality were close & they got massacred by Acend. They seem to generally struggle against Reyna there, which OXG can definitely pull out.
Same story on ascent, close game with FUT, win vs BBL. Though with this one, I would definitely give the edge to FNC considering they are also formidable on this map, it seems to have become almost a second staple for them alongside bind.
Unless OXG reworked their playstyle to incorporate Astra & Viper or FNC have an off-day, it's difficult to see FNC losing. It has been two weeks since an official game from OXG, so it is likely that they have reworked some aspects, but may be shaky incorporating them in official.
Who knows maybe OXG have been praccing Haven offline and pull it out after bind/ascent ban. Definitely potential for OXG; FNC are just a tough first opponent with all the momentum they have & how favorable the bans would be for them.
GL to both teams. No doubt in my mind, that OXG have studied the crap out of FNC. Let's see what they will bring.
Edit: They picked both Split and Haven. Let's see how this goes.
Also the team was 3 days old when they faced Acend. So that might have played a factor to them getting swept 13-0 vs Acend.
Gunzout97 [#41]Also the team was 3 days old when they faced Acend. So that might have played a factor to them getting swept 13-0 vs Acend.
Certainly a likely contributing factor to that loss. There are too many confounding factors to consider the "why" questions, so I prefer to stick to what happened and extrapolate from that for the most part.
It certainly hinges on the regional diff and how great that will actually be; that's the biggest unknown, even with BBL having a close game with Liquid, the uncertainty remains for these two games today.
teemu [#45]and this is oxygens map pick? HAHAHAHAHAHA
The last time they won on Haven was on October of 2020. They banned Bind & try to outsmart Fnatic with this Astra comp.
not_adhd [#59]two spots BTW
so whats your problem with those seeds? better say it. your toxic vibe is annoying af..