saw 1-0
completed
... 97 more matches
Saturday, January 28th
11:00 AM EST
Patch 6.01
EGN ban Fracture; SAW ban Ascent; EGN ban Bind; SAW ban Breeze; EGN ban Haven; SAW ban Pearl; Icebox remains
Betting
$100 on
SAW
returned
$100 at 1.00 pre-match odds
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Streams
VODs
Maps/Stats
13
SAW
7 /
6
Icebox
47:58
EGN Esports
5 /
3
8
SAW 
EGN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 1.29 1.39 | 220 223 217 | 15 9 6 | / 10 7 3 / | 10 3 7 | +5 +2 +3 | 71% 67% 78% | 150 149 151 | 22% 23% 20% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.17 1.12 1.23 | 222 247 191 | 16 10 6 | / 12 10 2 / | 2 1 1 | +4 0 +4 | 71% 58% 89% | 140 159 114 | 25% 24% 26% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.10 0.69 1.65 | 297 253 356 | 23 10 13 | / 19 13 6 / | 0 0 0 | +4 -3 +7 | 67% 58% 78% | 176 150 211 | 44% 50% 37% | 9 5 4 | 5 4 1 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.07 0.94 1.25 | 150 128 180 | 11 6 5 | / 13 8 5 / | 8 3 5 | -2 -2 0 | 71% 75% 67% | 110 98 124 | 32% 37% 26% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.82 0.79 0.85 | 144 132 162 | 10 5 5 | / 13 8 5 / | 8 5 3 | -3 -3 0 | 62% 58% 67% | 104 98 112 | 8% 4% 14% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.03 0.50 1.43 | 220 118 298 | 16 3 13 | / 14 8 6 / | 5 1 4 | +2 -5 +7 | 86% 78% 92% | 144 100 177 | 23% 20% 25% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
|
0.98 0.58 1.28 | 186 136 225 | 14 3 11 | / 13 7 6 / | 0 0 0 | +1 -4 +5 | 57% 44% 67% | 121 89 144 | 23% 25% 21% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
|
0.95 0.95 0.95 | 225 248 209 | 17 8 9 | / 16 7 9 / | 3 1 2 | +1 +1 0 | 86% 78% 92% | 131 132 131 | 40% 39% 40% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
|
0.70 0.77 0.65 | 152 136 164 | 9 3 6 | / 15 6 9 / | 7 2 5 | -6 -3 -3 | 62% 56% 67% | 113 83 135 | 19% 21% 18% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.66 0.60 0.70 | 156 150 161 | 11 5 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 3 0 3 | -6 -3 -3 | 62% 33% 83% | 97 80 109 | 26% 28% 24% | 1 1 0 | 3 0 3 | -2 +1 -3 |
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.29 1.39 1.33 | 220 223 217 | 15 9 6 | / 10 7 3 / | 10 3 7 | +5 +2 +3 | 71% 67% 78% | 150 149 151 | 22% 23% 20% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
|
1.12 1.23 1.17 | 222 247 191 | 16 10 6 | / 12 10 2 / | 2 1 1 | +4 0 +4 | 71% 58% 89% | 140 159 114 | 25% 24% 26% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
|
0.69 1.65 1.10 | 297 253 356 | 23 10 13 | / 19 13 6 / | 0 0 0 | +4 -3 +7 | 67% 58% 78% | 176 150 211 | 44% 50% 37% | 9 5 4 | 5 4 1 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
|
0.94 1.25 1.07 | 150 128 180 | 11 6 5 | / 13 8 5 / | 8 3 5 | -2 -2 0 | 71% 75% 67% | 110 98 124 | 32% 37% 26% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
|
0.79 0.85 0.82 | 144 132 162 | 10 5 5 | / 13 8 5 / | 8 5 3 | -3 -3 0 | 62% 58% 67% | 104 98 112 | 8% 4% 14% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0.50 1.43 1.03 | 220 118 298 | 16 3 13 | / 14 8 6 / | 5 1 4 | +2 -5 +7 | 86% 78% 92% | 144 100 177 | 23% 20% 25% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
|
0.58 1.28 0.98 | 186 136 225 | 14 3 11 | / 13 7 6 / | 0 0 0 | +1 -4 +5 | 57% 44% 67% | 121 89 144 | 23% 25% 21% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
|
0.95 0.95 0.95 | 225 248 209 | 17 8 9 | / 16 7 9 / | 3 1 2 | +1 +1 0 | 86% 78% 92% | 131 132 131 | 40% 39% 40% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
|
0.77 0.65 0.70 | 152 136 164 | 9 3 6 | / 15 6 9 / | 7 2 5 | -6 -3 -3 | 62% 56% 67% | 113 83 135 | 19% 21% 18% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.60 0.70 0.66 | 156 150 161 | 11 5 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 3 0 3 | -6 -3 -3 | 62% 33% 83% | 97 80 109 | 26% 28% 24% | 1 1 0 | 3 0 3 | -2 +1 -3 |
Head-to-head
Past Matches
capital_d_colon [#2]damn how is tomaszy rating so low>?
I would say that tomaszy's stats are pretty close to his rating. 1.11 is relatively normal for just a +4 K-D. Its a little lower than you would expect from the stats that you can see there, but it isn't absurd. Obviously his ACS is going to be huge because he took so many fights, but he lost fights a lot as well. A good number of his kills happened when his team had a significant man advantage as well.
It mainly looks weird because addicted is about the same as him. Addicted's rating is higher than normal because a whopping 8 of his 13 deaths came when his team had a big man advantage and those deaths didn't matter much.
Also assists matter a little bit, and tomaszy had 0.
FerahgoTheGreat [#3]I would say that tomaszy's stats are pretty close to his rating. 1.11 is relatively normal for just a +4 K-D. Its a little lower than you would expect from the stats that you can see there, but it isn't absurd. Obviously his ACS is going to be huge because he took so many fights, but he lost fights a lot as well. A good number of his kills happened when his team had a significant man advantage as well.
It mainly looks weird because addicted is about the same as him. Addicted's rating is higher than normal because a whopping 8 of his 13 deaths came when his team had a big man advantage and those deaths didn't matter much.
Also assists matter a little bit, and tomaszy had 0.
honestly fair enough.
rewatching the vod its actually pretty fair.
alot of his fds on atk were pretty sloppy resulting in 4v5s (his deaths were untradeable)
and a few fks being traded (round 18 for example)
hes a quite "snowball" type player. high mks
this was actually a great example of why acs doesnt always tell the full picture.
and it was a bit of a knee jerk reaction from me after seeing this:
https://twitter.com/valleague_pt/status/1619383547093225473?s=20
Discord