ez the noah aiello
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.11 2.51 2.01 | 378 109 445 | 22 5 17 | / 5 0 5 / | 4 0 4 | +17 +5 +12 | 93% 100% 92% | 209 44 250 | 20% 20% 20% | 6 0 6 | 1 0 1 | +5 0 +5 | |
|
1.54 1.93 1.44 | 284 318 277 | 17 4 13 | / 7 2 5 / | 7 3 4 | +10 +2 +8 | 87% 100% 83% | 153 204 141 | 18% 19% 18% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.49 0.43 1.75 | 229 49 275 | 13 1 12 | / 5 2 3 / | 8 1 7 | +8 -1 +9 | 80% 67% 83% | 166 35 198 | 28% 50% 27% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.40 2.32 1.17 | 161 248 140 | 7 3 4 | / 3 0 3 / | 8 3 5 | +4 +3 +1 | 93% 100% 92% | 102 132 94 | 30% 11% 39% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.96 0.59 1.06 | 199 75 231 | 11 2 9 | / 10 3 7 / | 3 2 1 | +1 -1 +2 | 87% 67% 92% | 107 31 126 | 9% 0% 10% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– |
---|
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.76 1.82 1.79 | 331 263 398 | 37 17 20 | / 13 6 7 / | 9 5 4 | +24 +11 +13 | 90% 93% 87% | 194 168 220 | 17% 14% 21% | 10 3 7 | 2 0 2 | +8 +3 +5 | |
|
1.36 1.89 1.62 | 252 202 303 | 31 14 17 | / 9 6 3 / | 11 3 8 | +22 +8 +14 | 83% 80% 87% | 155 125 185 | 28% 33% 25% | 4 3 1 | 1 1 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.93 1.26 1.59 | 234 315 153 | 25 18 7 | / 9 6 3 / | 16 11 5 | +16 +12 +4 | 97% 100% 93% | 145 213 77 | 40% 41% 37% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.40 1.61 1.51 | 279 258 301 | 31 14 17 | / 14 8 6 / | 15 8 7 | +17 +6 +11 | 87% 87% 87% | 162 171 152 | 14% 14% 15% | 5 4 1 | 0 0 0 | +5 +4 +1 | |
|
0.94 0.94 0.94 | 154 119 189 | 17 8 9 | / 15 7 8 / | 7 5 2 | +2 +1 +1 | 87% 87% 87% | 84 62 105 | 7% 0% 13% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– |
---|
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.78 1.83 1.61 | 307 332 207 | 18 15 3 | / 6 6 0 / | 8 8 0 | +12 +9 +3 | 100% 100% 100% | 188 233 7 | 48% 50% 0% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.76 1.59 2.43 | 275 241 414 | 18 13 5 | / 4 4 0 / | 3 2 1 | +14 +9 +5 | 87% 83% 100% | 145 148 131 | 29% 32% 18% | 3 3 0 | 1 1 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.48 1.27 2.29 | 274 243 400 | 14 10 4 | / 7 6 1 / | 8 5 3 | +7 +4 +3 | 87% 83% 100% | 170 163 197 | 11% 12% 7% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.47 1.57 1.05 | 283 302 211 | 15 12 3 | / 8 6 2 / | 5 5 0 | +7 +6 +1 | 87% 92% 67% | 179 199 100 | 15% 14% 25% | 4 3 1 | 1 0 1 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
0.91 1.02 0.47 | 108 130 22 | 6 6 0 | / 5 4 1 / | 4 3 1 | +1 +2 -1 | 87% 92% 67% | 61 70 22 | 3% 0% 100% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– |
---|
make that ur opinion, can't understand how acend is more inconsistent than sent, can't blame them from having actual competition. EU has a lot of teams that are very good, we can't say the same for NA, that's why sent appears so dominant. This is gonna be like CS, RL or any other game, NA thinks they are the best, and then get immediately clapped.
i don't know a lot about the EU region but your point of "can't say the same for NA" kappa, NA has like 8 teams who are really close to each other in terms of competition, definitely sen were winning but you need to understand the fact that these SEN players have their coordination and team-work before valo they are a team since beta version and others came a bit later and rn all the other 7-8 teams are pretty strong
Still can't see a world where any of the other teams beats SEN. The other teams may be evenly matched but only between each other. The only team who can win against SEN is Envy, faze is good but they can't adapt to SEN's playstyle and lose pretty easily. In EU, there's at least 5 teams capable of beating Acend, and believe me, if u are looking for coordination and team plays you should watch EU. NA has the best aim, I will give you that, but EU has everything else. I feel like SEN still relies too much on solo plays.
ye why would he play with c9 when his teammates were bots....it caused him to play bad too in few matches which can lead to his career down in the drain. ofcourse hes still on the loan but wouldnt be surprised with sentinels bought him and tenz choosing to compete. better for his stream and pro career
He can't just "quit" C9, he has a contract with them for the next 3 years. And the way these contracts are written in esports, makes it so that you can't represent another organisation whilst under contract and the only way to void the contract is if someone else bought it out or C9 broke its contractual obligations(i.e. stop paying TenZ's paycheck). C9 could keep TenZ on the bench for the next 3 years if they wanted to, whilst he of course would still be collecting the paycheck for doing nothing, but that also would prevent him from "quitting" C9 as you imply.