Nobody yet? I like IMT to 2-0. Better form as of late
Added Astra
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
244 126 | 21 11 10 | / 19 9 10 / | 8 2 6 | +2 +2 0 | 140 69 | 25% 41% 16% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
237 109 | 20 10 10 | / 19 9 10 / | 5 4 1 | +1 +1 0 | 144 58 | 17% 16% 19% | 2 0 2 | 5 1 4 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
181 120 | 15 5 10 | / 18 10 8 / | 7 3 4 | -3 -5 +2 | 112 77 | 17% 20% 15% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
172 78 | 11 6 5 | / 18 9 9 / | 10 6 4 | -7 -3 -4 | 135 58 | 34% 34% 33% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
147 74 | 12 6 6 | / 18 8 10 / | 9 4 5 | -6 -2 -4 | 93 47 | 52% 50% 54% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
412 220 | 34 20 14 | / 18 9 9 / | 8 3 5 | +16 +11 +5 | 230 100 | 24% 30% 19% | 7 3 4 | 0 0 0 | +7 +3 +4 | |||
|
216 142 | 19 6 13 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 4 1 | +3 -4 +7 | 133 79 | 10% 9% 11% | 2 0 2 | 1 2 -1 | +1 -2 +3 | |||
|
206 100 | 17 9 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 8 2 6 | 0 +1 -1 | 137 66 | 30% 41% 20% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
146 69 | 11 6 5 | / 14 8 6 / | 7 3 4 | -3 -2 -1 | 95 44 | 19% 21% 17% | 3 3 0 | 1 0 1 | +2 +3 -1 | |||
|
145 72 | 11 6 5 | / 14 6 8 / | 9 3 6 | -3 0 -3 | 105 50 | 18% 35% 8% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
246 121 | 62 33 29 | / 52 23 29 / | 16 7 9 | +10 +10 0 | 148 72 | 23% 30% 16% | 9 3 6 | 10 4 6 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
203 130 | 51 23 28 | / 42 22 20 / | 16 6 10 | +9 +1 +8 | 115 68 | 19% 31% 13% | 4 3 1 | 5 3 2 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
199 109 | 45 20 25 | / 53 25 28 / | 21 12 9 | -8 -5 -3 | 142 78 | 27% 26% 29% | 8 3 5 | 9 4 5 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
186 105 | 44 18 26 | / 43 20 23 / | 21 13 8 | +1 -2 +3 | 114 60 | 21% 21% 21% | 5 1 4 | 9 2 7 | -4 -1 -3 | |||
|
184 85 | 41 23 18 | / 51 24 27 / | 28 14 14 | -10 -1 -9 | 116 55 | 48% 54% 43% | 5 4 1 | 5 3 2 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
270 139 | 65 39 26 | / 52 26 26 / | 22 10 12 | +13 +13 0 | 179 78 | 24% 22% 25% | 12 7 5 | 3 3 0 | +9 +4 +5 | |||
|
251 114 | 59 31 28 | / 51 27 24 / | 16 8 8 | +8 +4 +4 | 154 67 | 37% 34% 40% | 10 4 6 | 9 5 4 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
209 103 | 48 24 24 | / 50 28 22 / | 21 15 6 | -2 -4 +2 | 130 63 | 11% 13% 8% | 5 0 5 | 7 5 2 | -2 -5 +3 | |||
|
158 89 | 35 18 17 | / 46 23 23 / | 28 15 13 | -11 -5 -6 | 121 71 | 22% 28% 18% | 4 3 1 | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
144 80 | 34 17 17 | / 45 23 22 / | 17 6 11 | -11 -6 -5 | 83 38 | 18% 24% 13% | 7 4 3 | 8 1 7 | -1 +3 -4 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
272 107 | 22 14 8 | / 15 6 9 / | 4 4 0 | +7 +8 -1 | 172 78 | 25% 30% 18% | 4 1 3 | 4 2 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
264 177 | 20 7 13 | / 17 7 10 / | 5 2 3 | +3 0 +3 | 184 126 | 26% 20% 32% | 5 1 4 | 2 2 0 | +3 -1 +4 | |||
|
171 92 | 13 6 7 | / 10 3 7 / | 8 6 2 | +3 +3 0 | 111 62 | 27% 29% 26% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |||
|
169 106 | 11 4 7 | / 17 8 9 / | 10 8 2 | -6 -4 -2 | 115 73 | 39% 50% 32% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
163 126 | 13 8 5 | / 14 6 8 / | 4 1 3 | -1 +2 -3 | 74 44 | 19% 36% 10% | 0 0 0 | 1 2 -1 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
272 122 | 20 12 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 9 5 4 | +3 +4 -1 | 170 83 | 11% 15% 7% | 2 0 2 | 4 1 3 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
230 94 | 17 10 7 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 3 1 | +1 +1 0 | 128 45 | 55% 59% 45% | 3 0 3 | 2 1 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
191 70 | 15 10 5 | / 15 8 7 / | 7 4 3 | 0 +2 -2 | 172 50 | 26% 18% 50% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
145 62 | 11 8 3 | / 17 8 9 / | 8 5 3 | -6 0 -6 | 97 40 | 25% 38% 16% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
132 69 | 10 5 5 | / 15 7 8 / | 2 0 2 | -5 -2 -3 | 63 22 | 16% 23% 7% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
266 142 | 23 10 13 | / 10 6 4 / | 5 2 3 | +13 +4 +9 | 159 81 | 22% 40% 13% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
236 78 | 18 13 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 9 2 7 | +2 +5 -3 | 139 46 | 56% 59% 50% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
223 129 | 19 8 11 | / 18 8 10 / | 4 1 3 | +1 0 +1 | 132 70 | 18% 22% 15% | 3 1 2 | 4 1 3 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
162 76 | 14 7 7 | / 18 9 9 / | 6 4 2 | -4 -2 -2 | 111 54 | 21% 22% 21% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
149 113 | 11 2 9 | / 14 8 6 / | 8 3 5 | -3 -6 +3 | 86 61 | 24% 33% 20% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
316 147 | 25 12 13 | / 18 10 8 / | 4 3 1 | +7 +2 +5 | 197 89 | 33% 20% 58% | 4 3 1 | 3 2 1 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
208 121 | 16 9 7 | / 19 9 10 / | 7 3 4 | -3 0 -3 | 133 83 | 20% 14% 25% | 3 2 1 | 2 2 0 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
185 131 | 13 4 9 | / 15 9 6 / | 11 7 4 | -2 -5 +3 | 161 124 | 26% 7% 38% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |||
|
153 102 | 13 6 7 | / 16 8 8 / | 8 3 5 | -3 -2 -1 | 89 49 | 19% 29% 13% | 2 0 2 | 3 0 3 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
138 45 | 9 6 3 | / 17 10 7 / | 7 6 1 | -8 -4 -4 | 88 27 | 11% 14% 6% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 |
I'm really not sure on this one.
I think IMT have looked better so far in Masters, But LG had no idea what to expect from SEN's new line-up. When LG play IMT, they will be far more prepared.
I thought IMT might have the advantage over 100T, and they sure gave them a run of it - whereas LG totally fluffed their last encounter with 100T. It was a bloodbath.
On average, LG hit more headies & have a better K/D than IMT.
IMT, on the other hand, do more damage per round, get more kills per round, more first bloods, and have a better entry success rate.
Neither team have been performing up to standard over their past 5 games, with players on both sides unable to reach their full potential, but LG have slipped a little further.
Over the past 5 games, IMT look better on ATK while LG look better on DEF.
IMT are having more overall success on map win %. And, if we see Ascent, Icebox & Bind played in this series, IMT have the advantage on Bind, with LG looking stronger on Icebox.
Ascent could be a real decider. Both teams are great. IMT perhaps a little more so.
I think the advantage goes to IMT but we will have to wait and see. Deep down, I want LG to move on through masters, and they sure could. It kind of depends on who is feeling cracked today.
ItsJNTHN [#8]If LG plays how they played yesterday against Sentinels they have a big chance to win this one
2-1 LG
u were right
This just proves that LG is one of the best teams in NA when it comes to firepower. I watched the game on and off while doing some other things but Thief and aproto combined for a -18 and LG beat IMT... Normally everyone is talking about Thief and aproto but dre, stellar and moose can pop off on any given day and carry this team to a win. Also jcStani is probably the most underrated player in NA. Stani is so damn good