4

Champions seeding

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
coconutMALLED

if based off of consistency points champions seeding will be:

  1. OpTic (1250)
  2. FPX (1200)
  3. PRX (1050)
  4. LOUD (650)
  5. DRX (550)
  6. Fnatic (525)
  7. Zeta (475)
  8. Leviatan (355)
  9. XERXIA (300)
  10. XSET (295)

if this is used for pots then it would be

Pot A: OpTic, FPX, PRX, LOUD
Pot B: DRX, Fnatic, Leviatan, ZETA
Pot C: XERXIA, XSET (probably) EMEA LCQ NA LCQ
Pot D: APAC LCQ, EA LCQ, LATAM LCQ, LATAM LCQ

#2
Enzolp
0
Frags
+

When they consider seeding (atleast in LoL) is by region and they consider like the last 8 internationals.
But yeah i don't know how they consider seeding here.

#3
esney
0
Frags
+

5head moment

#4
Woofysayswoof
0
Frags
+
Enzolp [#2]

When they consider seeding (atleast in LoL) is by region and they consider like the last 8 internationals.
But yeah i don't know how they consider seeding here.

pretty sure its this, at least thats what they did last year

#5
Enzolp
0
Frags
+
Woofysayswoof [#4]

pretty sure its this, at least thats what they did last year

i mean last year they didn't have any more data though

#6
inkie
11
Frags
+

they won't make pots, they will just give us another shit emea vs emea and na vs na groups stage

#7
number1_ScreaM_fan
1
Frags
+
inkie [#6]

they won't make pots, they will just give us another shit emea vs emea and na vs na groups stage

cant wait to watch fpx vs fantic part 42

#8
xLeo
0
Frags
+
number1_ScreaM_fan [#7]

cant wait to watch fpx vs fantic part 42

no cap

#9
Dybala21
1
Frags
+

Interesting, thanks for sharing. But i hope there’s no same region duel in group

#10
dourado
0
Frags
+

just an observation: in pots division, you put LOUD two times and forgot Leviatan.

#11
coconutMALLED
2
Frags
+
dourado [#10]

just an observation: in pots division, you put LOUD two times and forgot Leviatan.

thanks fixed it

#12
archetype
-2
Frags
+

Dumb decision if Riot actually use this seeding tbh, LCQ teams shouldn't necessarily be put in the same group as each other. They are the teams that have shown the best recent results and 2 of them going out in groups is terrible.

#13
w0v
0
Frags
+
inkie [#6]

they won't make pots, they will just give us another shit emea vs emea and na vs na groups stage

can't wait to watch all three na teams in one group and the sa teams in one group, and the three emea teams in one group, can't wait

#14
jackb2016
0
Frags
+

It would actually go like this:
Sorted by region:
EMEA 1: 1250
EMEA 2: 600
EMEA 3: 375
NA 1: 1250
NA 2: 450
BR 1: 650
LATAM 1: 425
SA (2): 350
JP: 600
KR: 550
APAC 1: 1050
APAC 2: 300

Final Sorted:

  1. EMEA 1
  2. NA 1
  3. APAC 1
  4. BR 1
  5. EMEA 2
  6. JP
  7. KR
  8. NA 2
  9. LATAM 1
  10. EMEA LCQ
  11. SA LCQ #1
  12. APAC 2
  13. NA LCQ
  14. APAC LCQ
  15. SA LCQ #2
  16. East Asia LCQ

13-16 are all interchangeable.

#15
jackb2016
1
Frags
+
archetype [#12]

Dumb decision if Riot actually use this seeding tbh, LCQ teams shouldn't necessarily be put in the same group as each other. They are the teams that have shown the best recent results and 2 of them going out in groups is terrible.

Pots do not equal groups

#16
archetype
0
Frags
+
jackb2016 [#15]

Pots do not equal groups

ah, my bad then

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment