g2 revenge
Running accuracy changes
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
318 219 | 23 10 13 | / 13 4 9 / | 8 4 4 | +10 +6 +4 | 193 125 | 38% 31% 43% | 6 3 3 | 2 2 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |||
|
271 176 | 21 10 11 | / 13 6 7 / | 6 3 3 | +8 +4 +4 | 161 98 | 29% 29% 29% | 3 2 1 | 2 2 0 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
194 86 | 15 9 6 | / 12 5 7 / | 9 8 1 | +3 +4 -1 | 115 53 | 20% 18% 23% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |||
|
172 82 | 13 8 5 | / 12 5 7 / | 12 6 6 | +1 +3 -2 | 115 48 | 24% 25% 22% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
165 61 | 14 9 5 | / 12 4 8 / | 4 2 2 | +2 +5 -3 | 109 38 | 32% 37% 25% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
201 73 | 14 10 4 | / 17 7 10 / | 3 1 2 | -3 +3 -6 | 141 48 | 14% 20% 4% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
193 84 | 12 7 5 | / 16 7 9 / | 8 5 3 | -4 0 -4 | 155 68 | 29% 35% 22% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
188 78 | 14 8 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 3 1 2 | -3 0 -3 | 123 48 | 20% 24% 14% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
161 65 | 13 8 5 | / 17 9 8 / | 7 2 5 | -4 -1 -3 | 98 30 | 27% 41% 13% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
149 77 | 9 5 4 | / 19 9 10 / | 5 1 4 | -10 -4 -6 | 106 49 | 18% 21% 15% | 2 0 2 | 4 1 3 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
283 181 | 42 18 24 | / 25 10 15 / | 12 6 6 | +17 +8 +9 | 183 108 | 29% 27% 31% | 11 4 7 | 5 3 2 | +6 +1 +5 | |||
|
243 116 | 39 22 17 | / 25 12 13 / | 13 9 4 | +14 +10 +4 | 138 65 | 29% 26% 33% | 6 3 3 | 2 2 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |||
|
221 129 | 34 16 18 | / 28 14 14 / | 12 5 7 | +6 +2 +4 | 138 71 | 27% 24% 30% | 4 2 2 | 7 3 4 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
167 66 | 27 17 10 | / 25 10 15 / | 11 4 7 | +2 +7 -5 | 114 45 | 31% 38% 23% | 5 3 2 | 2 1 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |||
|
151 79 | 24 11 13 | / 25 14 11 / | 20 10 10 | -1 -3 +2 | 95 41 | 18% 20% 17% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
206 105 | 34 16 18 | / 31 15 16 / | 5 3 2 | +3 +1 +2 | 127 63 | 25% 25% 26% | 8 3 5 | 8 3 5 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
186 110 | 23 10 13 | / 33 17 16 / | 16 7 9 | -10 -7 -3 | 137 76 | 27% 30% 24% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
178 85 | 27 16 11 | / 32 15 17 / | 5 1 4 | -5 +1 -6 | 113 53 | 17% 23% 12% | 2 0 2 | 6 2 4 | -4 -2 -2 | |||
|
155 75 | 21 14 7 | / 37 18 19 / | 9 3 6 | -16 -4 -12 | 97 42 | 22% 27% 18% | 5 3 2 | 6 1 5 | -1 +2 -3 | |||
|
151 79 | 23 12 11 | / 33 17 16 / | 13 4 9 | -10 -5 -5 | 95 43 | 23% 24% 21% | 2 2 0 | 4 1 3 | -2 +1 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
291 144 | 24 13 11 | / 13 7 6 / | 4 1 3 | +11 +6 +5 | 161 75 | 40% 36% 47% | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |||
|
247 145 | 19 8 11 | / 12 6 6 / | 4 2 2 | +7 +2 +5 | 174 92 | 20% 23% 18% | 5 1 4 | 3 1 2 | +2 0 +2 | |||
|
171 83 | 13 6 7 | / 15 8 7 / | 6 2 4 | -2 -2 0 | 115 45 | 24% 19% 32% | 1 0 1 | 5 1 4 | -4 -1 -3 | |||
|
168 71 | 13 8 5 | / 13 6 7 / | 7 2 5 | 0 +2 -2 | 118 51 | 31% 39% 22% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
129 75 | 11 3 8 | / 13 9 4 / | 8 4 4 | -2 -6 +4 | 76 34 | 12% 13% 11% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
223 130 | 20 8 12 | / 14 7 7 / | 2 2 0 | +6 +1 +5 | 131 77 | 31% 26% 36% | 6 2 4 | 5 2 3 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
178 135 | 11 3 8 | / 17 10 7 / | 8 2 6 | -6 -7 +1 | 119 84 | 25% 21% 27% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
161 74 | 12 9 3 | / 18 9 9 / | 4 2 2 | -6 0 -6 | 88 35 | 31% 35% 25% | 3 3 0 | 2 0 2 | +1 +3 -2 | |||
|
154 96 | 13 6 7 | / 15 8 7 / | 2 0 2 | -2 -2 0 | 86 58 | 23% 31% 19% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
140 93 | 10 4 6 | / 16 8 8 / | 6 2 4 | -6 -4 -2 | 93 55 | 20% 10% 27% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 |
supernova [#3]Again? Same match of qualify 1
Something is wrong with this seed/formatAnd again we don't have semifinals/final
Riot... Riot...
Maaaaan...
Yeah it's pretty weird for Europe compared to NA because it seems a lot more easier to understand the tournament format of NA
supernova [#3]Again? Same match of qualify 1
Something is wrong with this seed/formatAnd again we don't have semifinals/final
Riot... Riot...
Maaaaan...
Why do you want semifinals and a final? They would all be meaningless since all the teams in those games would've already qualified...
I think NiP will take it again.
If you look at the stats for both teams over their last 5 games, NiP are coming out stronger on average across the board.
I know M1xwell said they've been preparing for the NiP game, but NiP havent had to play Ch2, so no new vods to analyse.
NiP have had fresh data and new vods to work on, all without the pressure of competing. I reckon NiP will look even better than before.
NiP 2-1 G2
pampire [#7]I'm pretty sure they did this on purpose. Rivalries like this benefit them, so i feel like even after this match we're gonna see a lot more g2 vs nip
you sound like a reddittor lol
Fat_Lard [#6]Why do you want semifinals and a final? They would all be meaningless since all the teams in those games would've already qualified...
No winners of these games qualify for Masters whereas losers try again next week. Imagine if they play a double elimination bracket, no way Wave, Alliance or OG make it out(no offense to the teams)
Gunzout97 [#13]No winners of these games qualify for Masters whereas losers try again next week. Imagine if they play a double elimination bracket, no way Wave, Alliance or OG make it out(no offense to the teams)
Yes, that's what I meant by the teams in those games(semifinals and finals) would've already qualified. But I definitely agree that this should be a double elimination just without Finals or Semifinals since all 4 teams in the Semis would all have qualified for Masters already
greedeetv [#20]It's a weird match of confidence, G2 think they can win on a map that NiP traditionally wins (Ascent), but NiP asserts that they can win on one of G2's better maps (Haven). Second map should be an interesting watch!
G2 should take it, based on past performances.
Buuuuut... NiP are filth right now. Going to be a great map.
supernova [#25]Bring back Davidp LMAO
I don't understand why so many people say this. Davidp was failing both as an igl and as s fragger so he needed to be replaced, but zeek just wasn't what they needed they needed a more disciplined igl like akukhos(ex6tenz).
pampire [#30]I don't understand why so many people say this. Davidp was failing both as an igl and as s fragger so he needed to be replaced, but zeek just wasn't what they needed they needed a more disciplined igl like akukhos(ex6tenz).
im just kidding bro lol