And that is where I strongly disagree with you. I agree there are some biological differences between men and women that can lead to men having advantages over women like the evidence I provided. However I would very much like to say that I believe that good teamwork, communication, calling, strategy and constantly training your aim, reaction time and other things like diet can reduce but not fully close this gap (as we would assume the male teams would also do this maintaining the marginal gap caused by biological differences). However the idea that mindset is very different is stupid. If a women wants something she will also work fucking hard to achieve it. Your making an archaic, unlogical argument that because men used to hunt food they work harder. Please tell me how that works logically. Women can work just as hard as men and the only really difference if we assume two equally hard working male and female gamers would be the small biological differences of reaction time and speed (muscle volume can increase arm movement speed)
Female Teams
OK. Think about this logically. Your argument only applys to fully biological things. There are limits to humans. We have 24 hours in a day, we need sleep. There will be men and women who work say 16 hours a day on esports and they will be equal until it comes to the small margins of biological difference as I previously said. To give you a real life examples I will give you the example of lawyers. The top lawyers are a mixture of male and female. Some of the best lawyers are male some are female because they both work equally hard. You again made the mistake of saying 'average' we are not talking about the 'average' we are talking about the 99.9th percentile in which in terms of ethic there will be no difference because we are all limited by standard human limits
Yet, there will be X times more men than women with that unreal work ethic, who came this far and didn't give up
X times more men means X times more men than women, who achieved their goals in the end, ignoring all biological differences, only taking into account proportions
Now these selected ones may be equal between each other because of human limits, but gender wise there's gonna be >y men per 1 woman, where "y" may vary from digits to hundreds
Your acting under the assumption that when we are at hte 99.9th percentile it has followed a linear trend when at this point we are essentially talking mostly about anomalies when it comes to talent and work ethic so this dosen't really work as we are essentially guessing about the proportion. Because of secondary factors 'y' may be rather large until these factors are negatied over time but once the secondary factor advantages men have , which neither of us have denied exist because they do, but at that time they 'y' number becomes predictable because of how high a percentile we are talking about.
Discord