as an EU fan when i watch the top NA teams like OPTIC, C9, NRG, XSET and more i just feel like their utilisation of agents is far more superior to EU and just better at the moment ( fade is a good example)
also OPTIC rn is showing some old gambit level team work and chemistry with the best util and strats
EU games rn looks like how old sentinels played very normal and simple util with solid team work while TOP NA looks more versatile and has some textbook strats and new stuff they're trying out and i like watching those games more
is it just me?
0
EU vs NA
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
Nisham [#3]Doesn't NA always look better than EU before masters and champs?
this is actually a really good point, i always thought they look better before in their regional tourneys but flop in internationals but this time i feel like they are somewhat better just the way optic is playing is really convincing
It's not just you. It feels like EU right now is mostly based on individual plays. Many teams have a 'star' in the roster who needs to perform for the team to win. NA on the other side is really strat heavy. Clearly the teams still have 'stars' in the rosters but it feels like the executions don't rely on one person to pop off.
At least that's my impression of the scene right now. Maybe the new meta just fits NA teams better than EU teams. I'm definitely hyped to see which teams will earn a spot for copenhagen and what region will perform the best on the international stage.
NG1nS [#6]worse or better?
Old gambit was miles ahead, nobody has come close to them, and nobody will for a long time. As of now, the only team who can br as good as gambit was is gambit itself
Discord