Lets go TSM
Running accuracy changes
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
237 144 | 16 6 10 | / 17 7 10 / | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | 154 93 | 38% 39% 37% | 5 1 4 | 2 0 2 | +3 +1 +2 | |||
|
207 146 | 14 6 8 | / 15 7 8 / | 2 0 2 | -1 -1 0 | 243 154 | 30% 43% 26% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |||
|
198 127 | 13 5 8 | / 18 7 11 / | 2 0 2 | -5 -2 -3 | 132 88 | 36% 20% 42% | 2 2 0 | 3 2 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
172 143 | 12 3 9 | / 15 7 8 / | 6 2 4 | -3 -4 +1 | 97 80 | 22% 0% 27% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |||
|
144 75 | 8 4 4 | / 17 6 11 / | 5 2 3 | -9 -2 -7 | 108 60 | 44% 33% 53% | 0 0 0 | 1 2 -1 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
274 151 | 20 9 11 | / 13 8 5 / | 5 5 0 | +7 +1 +6 | 174 78 | 21% 21% 20% | 5 1 4 | 2 1 1 | +3 0 +3 | |||
|
251 97 | 17 10 7 | / 13 8 5 / | 6 5 1 | +4 +2 +2 | 163 59 | 18% 18% 20% | 3 3 0 | 3 1 2 | 0 +2 -2 | |||
|
227 86 | 18 11 7 | / 14 9 5 / | 5 2 3 | +4 +2 +2 | 143 44 | 18% 16% 20% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
207 92 | 15 9 6 | / 12 8 4 / | 2 0 2 | +3 +1 +2 | 97 20 | 17% 19% 9% | 3 2 1 | 3 1 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |||
|
176 41 | 12 10 2 | / 11 7 4 / | 5 2 3 | +1 +3 -2 | 111 20 | 14% 19% 0% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
285 159 | 70 35 35 | / 45 24 21 / | 11 4 7 | +25 +11 +14 | 221 128 | 23% 15% 29% | 13 5 8 | 5 2 3 | +8 +3 +5 | |||
|
196 123 | 44 17 27 | / 54 27 27 / | 19 11 8 | -10 -10 0 | 127 80 | 34% 38% 32% | 6 2 4 | 8 5 3 | -2 -3 +1 | |||
|
195 119 | 48 22 26 | / 49 24 25 / | 13 6 7 | -1 -2 +1 | 109 64 | 34% 37% 32% | 8 3 5 | 5 4 1 | +3 -1 +4 | |||
|
193 102 | 45 25 20 | / 52 23 29 / | 10 4 6 | -7 +2 -9 | 117 63 | 29% 22% 35% | 9 5 4 | 9 5 4 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
149 105 | 34 10 24 | / 47 25 22 / | 25 19 6 | -13 -15 +2 | 96 67 | 20% 12% 23% | 2 1 1 | 3 4 -1 | -1 -3 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
245 109 | 59 34 25 | / 45 26 19 / | 11 8 3 | +14 +8 +6 | 185 71 | 15% 16% 13% | 7 5 2 | 10 2 8 | -3 +3 -6 | |||
|
243 132 | 55 24 31 | / 51 27 24 / | 13 9 4 | +4 -3 +7 | 149 72 | 20% 22% 17% | 15 5 10 | 14 3 11 | +1 +2 -1 | |||
|
220 93 | 45 28 17 | / 45 23 22 / | 25 12 13 | 0 +5 -5 | 152 63 | 17% 20% 13% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
191 107 | 46 20 26 | / 52 29 23 / | 18 8 10 | -6 -9 +3 | 113 57 | 14% 13% 16% | 3 1 2 | 6 2 4 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
171 80 | 42 22 20 | / 48 28 20 / | 17 9 8 | -6 -6 0 | 97 43 | 23% 24% 22% | 3 2 1 | 6 2 4 | -3 0 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
351 164 | 31 18 13 | / 12 7 5 / | 6 3 3 | +19 +11 +8 | 243 137 | 16% 8% 23% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |||
|
236 111 | 19 12 7 | / 17 8 9 / | 7 3 4 | +2 +4 -2 | 143 70 | 22% 20% 25% | 5 2 3 | 3 2 1 | +2 0 +2 | |||
|
235 137 | 19 9 10 | / 18 10 8 / | 7 5 2 | +1 -1 +2 | 130 78 | 31% 44% 24% | 4 2 2 | 4 2 2 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
177 121 | 17 6 11 | / 15 8 7 / | 4 2 2 | +2 -2 +4 | 91 53 | 38% 60% 27% | 2 1 1 | 1 2 -1 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
129 78 | 8 2 6 | / 18 10 8 / | 12 12 0 | -10 -8 -2 | 96 60 | 22% 14% 26% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
297 145 | 27 16 11 | / 16 8 8 / | 3 1 2 | +11 +8 +3 | 222 102 | 13% 17% 10% | 2 1 1 | 6 1 5 | -4 0 -4 | |||
|
231 133 | 17 7 10 | / 20 10 10 / | 5 2 3 | -3 -3 0 | 151 83 | 18% 20% 15% | 7 4 3 | 4 1 3 | +3 +3 0 | |||
|
225 109 | 16 7 9 | / 19 9 10 / | 10 7 3 | -3 -2 -1 | 153 66 | 24% 27% 20% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
136 87 | 9 3 6 | / 21 10 11 / | 8 2 6 | -12 -7 -5 | 95 54 | 13% 14% 13% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
124 49 | 11 6 5 | / 18 10 8 / | 9 7 2 | -7 -4 -3 | 84 39 | 23% 28% 18% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
298 165 | 25 11 14 | / 18 10 8 / | 3 1 2 | +7 +1 +6 | 183 97 | 29% 17% 41% | 8 3 5 | 0 0 0 | +8 +3 +5 | |||
|
209 147 | 17 4 13 | / 19 11 8 / | 7 4 3 | -2 -7 +5 | 141 99 | 33% 35% 31% | 2 0 2 | 3 1 2 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
172 96 | 15 10 5 | / 17 9 8 / | 7 3 4 | -2 +1 -3 | 89 50 | 26% 22% 29% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
147 101 | 14 5 9 | / 14 8 6 / | 7 5 2 | 0 -3 +3 | 96 63 | 17% 13% 19% | 2 1 1 | 1 2 -1 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
145 73 | 13 8 5 | / 17 8 9 / | 1 1 0 | -4 0 -4 | 80 35 | 29% 28% 29% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
258 121 | 17 11 6 | / 15 7 8 / | 10 3 7 | +2 +4 -2 | 185 95 | 14% 14% 13% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
223 117 | 18 8 10 | / 18 9 9 / | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | 126 56 | 21% 25% 17% | 3 0 3 | 8 1 7 | -5 -1 -4 | |||
|
210 144 | 19 6 13 | / 17 10 7 / | 5 4 1 | +2 -4 +6 | 107 70 | 12% 7% 15% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
188 83 | 15 8 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | 165 50 | 13% 14% 11% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
181 102 | 16 7 9 | / 18 10 8 / | 6 2 4 | -2 -3 +1 | 109 65 | 29% 28% 30% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
My issue with Gen.G is Huynh literally goes completely absent from time to time. When he carries around a 5000$ gun, if he's not bringing the impact it kills them in the end usually. Pinning him against Wardell just seems rough.
Only way Gen.G win is if Huynh shows up and scares TSM into playing a slow paced game. Then shawn can shine.
WashedUpCsgoStar [#2]My issue with Gen.G is Huynh literally goes completely absent from time to time. When he carries around a 5000$ gun, if he's not bringing the impact it kills them in the end usually. Pinning him against Wardell just seems rough.
Only way Gen.G win is if Huynh shows up and scares TSM into playing a slow paced game. Then shawn can shine.
I agree, if huynh becomes more consistent, gen.g can become legit tier1
TSM needs some roster changes. At the end of last year, this team was beginning to look shakey after losing to Gen G.
Wardell can only do so much, it’s the 3rd map and he is the only one positive in his team... others are way too inconsistent...
This is very worrying.... hopefully the coach is taking action
Tyranitar [#24]Unlucky tsm but amazing performance by wardell gotta give him credit
Wardell gonna pull a tenz "I'm just worry about me" jk pls don't take seriously
xdee1234 [#26]if tsm doesnt qual for masters theres gonna be changes
If they don’t qualify there has to be changes
SharubuNguvu [#5]I agree, if huynh becomes more consistent, gen.g can become legit tier1
Hyuhn showed up big today and gave shawn the extra space. Glad to see he played his A game.
Tyranitar [#24]Unlucky tsm but amazing performance by wardell gotta give him credit
Ascent was saved by Wardell
Philosopher_Stone [#27]If they don’t qualify there has to be changes
I feel like TSM is having an identity crisis right now.. They played the triple duelist comp at First Strike, then gave it up after losing to 100T in the finals. Their refusal to play sentinel agents on bind makes no sense. Drone is in a slump right now and Wardell can only carry so much. On top of that their plays are really sloppy.
valplayer1 [#33]I feel like TSM is having an identity crisis right now.. They played the triple duelist comp at First Strike, then gave it up after losing to 100T in the finals. Their refusal to play sentinel agents on bind makes no sense. Drone is in a slump right now and Wardell can only carry so much. On top of that their plays are really sloppy.
They might need a new coach.
PG_newt [#36]TSM need to drop subroza and hazed to bring in brax for the sentinel role to support wardell+drone
Question: who is the in game leader for TSM?
PG_newt [#36]TSM need to drop subroza and hazed to bring in brax for the sentinel role to support wardell+drone
Drop subroza? Where can I get what you're smoking?