why only 3 teams each group qualify to playoffs. NA format miles better than this shit btw (including open qualifiers for 8 slots). Arguably most competitive region but shittiest format sadge
Ploodle_Shankypoo [#3]I AGREE, THIS FEELS LIKE A FRANCHISE 8 TEAMS STAY EVEN IF THEY ARE SHIT AND 2 TEAMS PROMOTE JUST DO QUALIFIERS AGAIN WHAT IS THIS THE UEFA SUPER LEAGUE WHAT THE FUCK
Yeah, feel so bad for VIT stacked team. I feel like NA format is best this time
katsu_vlr [#5]I swear to god every event has had a different format. Theyre definitely just experimenting at this point
its like pre-franchising format at this point :)). 6 fixed slots
katsu_vlr [#5]I swear to god every event has had a different format. Theyre definitely just experimenting at this point
YES THIS IS IT, THEY ARE OBVIOUSLY EXPERIMENTING TILL THEY FIND A GOOD FORMAT SINCE THIS IS THEIR 2ND YEAR BUT I DONT FUCKING LIKE IT
patuj [#8]true 6 teams in playoffs is just tragic. Just look at group a: FPX, Fnatic, G2, Acend, Fokus, OG LDNU and only 3 makes it through. Like wtf.
only 2 groups 12 teams but somehow only 6 team to playoffs like wtf :)). Its not like champions league 8 groups 32 teams :))
Dokka [#2]The VLRs are great but I wish there were 8 teams for playoffs yea
only issue i have with the VLR's is that more teams should qualify for promotion and more teams should be relegated cause rn 2 slots probably won't be enough to keep t2 orgs invested
batstew1 [#10]only issue i have with the VLR's is that more teams should qualify for promotion and more teams should be relegated cause rn 2 slots probably won't be enough to keep t2 orgs invested
True, they could atleast give 4 slots for promotion (so it would be 8 slots for top 8 teams who were in the previous challengers and 4 from promotion).
This way they could have max. 4 new teams in challengers