Time to rant I guess
So forsaken was one of paper rex's DUELIST players when they were first starting out. Chronicle has been a flex player for a long time (idk when he started).
Forsaken only switched to a flex player when something joined prx and then he played duelist a lot at Tokyo because something couldn't go and they had to use a sub. This switch when something joined was big, and was also probably a reason that paper rex played better, not just because of something.
If you look at the stats when both players were playing full flex, forsaken actually does better than chronicle (Champs 2023, Madrid)
This not only shows that forsaken was the theoretical better player at the events they both flexed, but it also shows that although chronicle may have been the better player historically, nowadays forsaken seems better, especially considering he went to Madrid and chronicle didn't. (Although fnatic does seem to be looking better after winning stage 1)
Now we wait to see how my opinion gets invalidated by people saying "🏆🏆🏆 vs. " or "prx glazer" or something like that