| Flag: | United States |
| Registered: | April 22, 2021 |
| Last post: | February 3, 2023 at 8:59 PM |
| Posts: | 225 |
For me, my predictions are:
EG vs. LG - LG
XSET vs. C9 - C9
100T vs. GRD - 100T
PK vs. SEN - SEN
Rise vs. V1 - V1
NRG vs. OG - OG
I expect EG LG to be close
100T GRD should be close but I expect 100T to step it up for this week
NRG OG is the most banger match imo, I expect 3 maps regardless, mostly depends on OG's form
Who’s gonna tell him?
tenz's "meh" is still insanely good, probably still top 3, thats why i put him so high
i put him in 6th??!?! i'm not going to put someone super high on a list if they haven't placed well in multiple of their last tournaments. Also its just my opinion im sure wardell could be a better jett than s0m
sounds pretty fair, neon up and coming for sure
like i said its debatable, sometimes he can be the best jett in na, sometimes he can be meh, depends on the tournament
I honestly think he could break top 5 if he was consistently on his game but he just is too inconsistent to put high but also too good to put lower than 10 imo
For sure could be, havent see enough of him against the top teams yet to put him that high
Yeah i put him just cause of how well he played against C9, i also dont think hes reached his potnetial yet
"of course that's not always the case"
That tottally depends on how the team is playing jett. "making space" is done so by killing players in that said space, of course that's not always the case but for the most part if they want to take control of B main they need to kill the players playing b main and thats done so off of utility and coordination with the duelist being the first contact. The duelist doesnt need to be getting kills as long as hes getting traded. Other players not doing as well is not really a testemant to how good asuna is but rather how well the team plays with him
If they can bring a top 3 team to a close map in their first official together they can beat some random tier 2 teams
yeah that's just not true. The maps weren't lost exclusively over duels. Ur leaving out so many factors like coordination, set plays, comms, etc... it's not just "if he got kills why can't you?"
It generally is, the duelist is the one that's set up for kills with flashes, sucks, mollies and other util. If you watch the match you can see thats how asuna gets a lot of his kills
i meant to say a pretty big margin lol
That's just not how it works... C9 went 9-3 on defense and 100T went 7-4 even tho C9 was the better team both teams got a majority of their rounds on defense sides. Also you can't just say a map isn't one sided "if you're good" cause then every map would just be sided towards the better team. Stats show u have a 10% higher chance of winning a round on defense which is extraordinarily high.
Split ct side is the most one sided half in all the maps by a pretty margin too
if they win 3/5 matches they auto qual. That would assume that they would lose to NV and one of those teams. What I'm saying is there's no chance they lose to 2 of those teams as well as envy
as bad as Sen could be there's no shot they lose to knights, nrg and V1. Maybe 1 but not all 3.
Not really... I'd like to see TSM do good but I'm definitely a big T1 fan
The exact ruling is immortal at some point in time. That way players only have to prove their skill once and can focus on scrims as much as they want
T1 and rise (safe bets)
KCP (little spicy)
Bait academy (really spicy)
TSM, FaZe, Akrew and GenG honorable mentions
Saying Derrek’s performance is better than shahz is definitely not fair. Shahzam was literally the 17th best performer at champions despite the fact that they lost 2 series and only won 1. Derrek’s online performance has been good during the recent opens and lcq but is incomparable to shahz’s long term performance
I really never saw him as a top 5 sova till now. I think 100T bad performance at lcq is hindering from the fact that hiko performed phenomenally well against the best teams in the world (Gambit and acend). Derrek is an amazing sova but he’s fairly new to tier 1 play and calling him top 3 is like calling Trent top 5.
idk about indisputably, he's good but he hasn't really proven that much compared to hiko or shahz imo. A lot of people get recency bias cause of watching him play well, i wouldn't say hes top 3 because of 1 or 2 good series hes had recently
Xeta could also be 5th forgot about him
I think this is based too much on this one qualifier, i think a more fair ranking would be
you don't know any context or why they got the warning. Could be a warning for typing. What did he type? it could be literally something like keep it up team. Was the warning for talking? who knows, even subroza said probably and we don't know if that was the purpose of it. You literally don't know anything and are jumping to conclusions
brush streaming pov twitch.tv/brush
Random player who's not an igl
igl for tier 3 team who has already been picked up
someone who obviously doesn't want to igl
The amount of igls is so scarce in NA that it becomes necessary to look to other places, i could name 5+ NA igls who are better than ec1s but theyre signed already to good teams
what does that have to do with what i said?
not everyone that has a bad game in lower level lobbies is boosted u know
that was more of a troll vid, do u remember anyone saying he should be dropped afterwords? no? weird isnt it.
the only time i used rank to "discredit" someone was when they were saying the dumbest shit and i called them gold, i really dont think this is comparable. i dont remember anyone flaming him in berlin and if they were they had no reason to cause he was playing fine. zombs has never been known to "whiff" until this one series but yeah he sucks and always whiffs kills.
hes at the bottom of his leaderboard... compared to the rest of him team of some of the best players in the world.... context
as a smokes player against the best teams in the world? its not like its insane but its definitely not bad and if u think it is than u dont watch enough pro valorant
also being good at astra doesnt get u more kills bro, do u even play this game?
impact on smokes is 90% in game and 10% kd, not a good comparison and also .9kd is like slightly lower than other astra players?
i never said he wasnt their worst player lmao i said that he had 1 bad map, just because hes their worst player doesnt mean that he has a bad map every map
lmao bottom 5 with a .95kd and a 170acs, not to mention he played the most rounds of anyone on that list.
100T isnt "my team"? like tf? u want me to analyze 100T games during champs? idk who told u zombs was a trash player or why u hate him sm but his stats and clutches speak for himself. just cause hes not doing incredible all the time hes definelty getting the job done. out of all the players on the team zombs has performances like this the least so i really dont understand all the hate. maybe people are just tryna scapegoat someone but what do i know im just a 100T fan
besides for that 1 map he played fine, you wanna drop tenz too for his performance? maybe boaster? vanity? stax? i could keep going
ah yes a top tier analyst, a radiant astra player just what i meant. removing someone for having a bad series is incredibly stupid, i didnt hear a single word about zombs' performance at rejkyavik, berlin or any other tournament. You cant just take the bottom frag and use him as a scapegoat. They all played bad at one point or another and blaming 1 person is very weak minded
literally every analyst in valorant, im sorry you as a gold player dont see it but theres people that do this for a living that know better
yeah im just convinced you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, zombs is considered one of the best smoke players in the world. Marved is good and you could make a case that hes better than zombs but calling zombs shit to marved is just not true lmfao
Discord