jingg and forsaken will likely be gone next year
| Flag: | International |
| Registered: | September 5, 2021 |
| Last post: | December 22, 2024 at 3:46 PM |
| Posts: | 5595 |
jingg and forsaken will likely be gone next year
@DRX please make it happen that would be an insane game
everything on the line with the classic NA v EMEA matchup
Derke lower bracket buff incoming
they looked amazing stfu
DRX vs PRX would be great but honestly I'd rather see a new matchup with Optic.
IMO DRX has a way better chance of winning against them, but still.
Am not saying they cheated but half team in different rooms. Officials not checking equipment in room possible use of deficit. Not normally aim check covid room pc.
pepelaugh
With this win, PRX confirms at the very least a 3rd place finish! Every single Valorant region has had a podium finish now.
PRX felt in control for the whole map
ascent was close, bind really wasn't.
great game, if Derke played better it would've been perfect
this isn't helping your point LMFAO
seek help touch grass find god
i'd normally recommend the three of these but you're beyond any help
derke isn't allowed any comfort playing against Jinggg and Forsaken, which I think is the reason he isn't fragging as much.
used all the ACS against Guild sadly
regeneration period is 1 day so he'll be back next match
if the last remaining NA team can't win against dogshit what does that make NA
it was a close match but they lost a lot of rounds to a mid crunch led by Jinggg, and a crucial 1v4 retake by mindfreak.
i have no clue why they're picking Ascent.
he's been playing sooo well this tournament, way better than I think I've ever seen him play!
they spent extended period of time in a relatively crowded room with each other so I wouldn't be surprised
i think the symptoms aren't too bad though (from the PRX vlog)
300 ACS average from three maps
These mfs suck balls on attack they play so slow and waste all their info until. but it doesn't even matter because they're insane on the defence
https://tracker.gg/valorant/leaderboards/ranked/all/default?page=1®ion=eu
maybe it's because the new act started recently, because there's
1.14 mil NA
2.04 mil EMEA
2.2 mil APAC (incl SA, OCE, JP)
like 3 months ago, I remember the playerbases were something like
~1.8 million NA
~3 million EMEA
~3 million APAC (this APAC includes JP, South Asia, and Oceania)
I'm not really sure how any of this is relevant though.
the original comment was " people from different us states couldnt play together,"
Europe has ~700 million people and ~40 countries
The U.S. has ~300 million people and 50 states
yeah I meant sponsors for tournaments
that team has been playing valorant at a high level in an extremely popular region (in terms of sponsors and tournaments) since the ignition series, it's natural that their winnings are also high.
no difference
EU v EU to see who gets stomped by the loser of PRX v Fnatic
It really does look like they're sticking with just 10 teams. That's incredibly disappointing to see.
I suppose being optimistic it means that they must have a secondary system to allow the other teams to qualify into top-level competition since I can't imagine they'd be okay with just stringing orgs like Shopify that have T1 female rosters out to dry.
https://www.vlr.gg/112322/leviat-n-vs-drx-valorant-champions-tour-stage-2-masters-copenhagen-ubqf , then scroll down
derke takes way more risks while playing on both sides
he's in insane form rn, putting up even better numbers than he did in Korea. 0.28 FKPR compared to his domestic 0.20
will he maintain this form going into the playoffs? I think DRX becomes a top 4 candidate at the minimum if so.
Discord