Tbf, Americas franchise doesnt have any Central America representative either. π€―
Flag: | Brazil |
Registered: | May 18, 2022 |
Last post: | August 17, 2023 at 8:22 AM |
Posts: | 2658 |
Tbf, Americas franchise doesnt have any Central America representative either. π€―
Culturalmente falando eles n sΓ£o focados em FPS, sΓ£o mobeiros... mesmo q evoluam n vΓ£o dominar o mundo.
Agora seria um momento PERFEITO pra frear o desenvolvimento deles, estΓ£o num momento embrionΓ‘rio e existe um motivo SUPER plausΓvel pra boicotar os times chineses, q eh essa decisΓ£o arbitrΓ‘ria da Tencent π€, todos os times das franquias deveriam isolar os times chineses como protesto a isso...
Mas claro q vΓ£o querer pagar de good guy e se foderem pros queridinhos da riot no futuro... principalmente o saadhak q eh viciado em se fazer de good guy gente boa sangue bom pqp... pensam mto pequeno, eh o comeΓ§o do fim. π
Eu pelo menos tentei avisar... π₯±
Pooperex too high
PRX literally has the same level as DRX, we saw in this group stage that Americas league is MUCH superior than EMEA and Pacific, its not that crazy...
Bc we saw that the EMEA league is WEAK compared to the Americas...
The chance that LOUD has evolved much more than FNATIC is great, and its not like FNATIC dominated LOUD, won in the 5th map with overtime π¬
If MIBR hadnt won 100t in the last round of VCT Americas, EG wouldnt have made it to the playoffs...
Sentinels has that same vibe, if they were playing in the playoffs, theyd be in Tokyo fs... π
Totally honest, you may notice that NaVi isnt on the list. π₯ But they will back to Champions π
Remember what happened when LOUD was eliminated in last place in the group stage of Masters Copenhagen, being eliminated by an underdog team (KRU) and core OPTIC... π€―
Champions await you, born to win. π€
Fkin L
Os times das franquias do Americas, EMEA e PacΓfico tinham q se juntar e isolar a China como protesto as 3 vagas free q um paΓs sozinho vai receber...
KK is not new talent, demon1 and smth are
Aspas has been playing against the best teams itw for 1 year...
If he played against the farmers in China and was always losing in the group stage he would have a 2.0 rating bro.
For god no, the entire EDG team plays for him to always shine...
He is a baiter, I invite u to watch round 2 between EDG and T1 on fracture, and ull realize that 4 EDG slaves do everything for this bot to farm stats. π¬
FNC or LOUD wouldnt play for him to shine like EDG slaves do. π₯±
Unfortunately current NAVI is not S tier, they were EMEA seed 4, and 1.08 rating is not a super performance... π
Aspas performs consistently against tier S teams for over a year, this discussion doesnt exist. π
More consistent in never playing against S tier teams ROFL
Tf is this discussion? KangKang has only played group stage so far, NEVER faced a tier S team... π₯±
?
Tf is this discussion? KangKang has only played group stage so far, NEVER faced a tier S team... π₯±
Theyre acting like they won the Champions π€£
KangKang will never be Aspas. π€
Bro, u guys need to understand that he literally only played group stage until now, he never faced tier S teams...
If your team loses to SHITMEA seed 4, u can stop playing valorant now. Just focus on LOL and table tennis π¬
All those mentioned do not reach the feet of Aspas and Derke LMFAO
Dont offend GOAT Aspas like that, this ZMJKKJMZJNSJZK doesnt come close to Aspas. π₯±
The whole EDG team plays for him to shine, they do it more than OPTIC played for yay to shine... π₯±
Does anyone remember the whole team escorting him so he can have jetts ult in 2 round eco on the fracture? this is bizarre.
Stop hyping this limited player, ty. π€
Vc foi GIGANTE nesse FURIA overrated π€
I see a lot of people putting them as favorites for the title along with Fnatic and LOUD, and imo they dont even beat NRG Liquid and EG, they are on the same level as DRX...
Imo: PRX and LEV
thoughts?
LEV πππππππππππππ
cned
ange1
shao
suygetsu
zyppan
LOUD 3-2 FNC π
FNC 3-2 NRG π
LOUD 3-1 NRG π
FNC 2-1 DRX π
NRG 2-1 EG π
DRX 2-1 NAVI π
EG 2-0 DRX π
LOUD 2-1 NRG π
FNC 2-1 LOUD
FNC 2-1 LIQUID π
NRG 2-1 LIQUID π
LOUD 2-1 FNC π
LOUD 2-1 LIQUID π
NRG 2-1 DRX π
FNC 2-0 DRX π
NAVI 2-1 EG π
EG 2-0 EDG π
LIQUID 2-0 PRX π
NRG 2-0 PRX π
FNC 2-1 EG π
LOUD 2-1 EG π