not saying I agree or disagree with you, but you're never going to win this argument. not because you're wrong (or right), but because people are never consistent with their arguments lmao
they'll point at numbers and stats if it helps their argument, then go "numbers aren't everything" if the numbers don't help their argument. they'll say a player's bad aim is forgiven because "he has good util/comms/etc," but then they'll say the exact opposite for another player. so on and so forth.
you are probably right and people on this website exaggerate so so much. in my opinion, if zellsis really were that bad as this website likes to claim, SEN would've replaced him long ago. i don't see why kaplan or drewspark would've kept him if they're looking at JUST numbers like vlr frogs do.
edit: looking at the chain above my comment... oh ma lawd