| Flag: | Italy |
| Registered: | September 30, 2021 |
| Last post: | July 17, 2022 at 8:05 PM |
| Posts: | 3108 |
50k a year, honestly I don't think that will be the deciding factor since acend players probably make that already and the stipends that riot gives will help with that, but I imagine Riot would rather have an org with facilities, ties in the scene, prestige, etc. than such a new org like acend that nobody knows what will happen with in 5 years
I honestly hate the concept of a "stats based" agent tier list. There's so many variables and things you may not consider in your process and could fuck up the whole thing. I'd much rather see a personal list from a knowledgeable person even if it may be a little opinionated. But then again, the stats one is going to almost always be opinionated as well depending on what factors you decide to consider
he's not even playing in vrl, he's currently playing in tier 3 valorant
A lot of the acs of the agents are based on 1 map with them, that's not a useful metric because the sample size is insanely small.
I don't know if the comparison with derke is serious or what, but the fact that he's playing against tier3 competition is a more than valid criticism.
There's a huge gap between the vrl and challengers, let's not even talk about the gap between the third divition and challengers
I'm not saying he would be awful in tier 1, but let's not act like the stats mean anything
we still don't know how fusion will do against them
they already play no double duelists on bind, ascent, icebox, and even split. I don't get this line of reasoning
why doesn't forsaken play chamber like he already does in a lot of maps, I feel like neon is so good on fracture when paired with a kayo, but overall I don't see the need to bring 2 duelists to that map when a second initiator / sage / viper can offer a lot more
nevermind, imagine the finals as pre show for this
I will come back in 2023 to see a partnered team playing demotion in tier 2 valorant
If these leaked msgs are what they seem, the fucking ego of WARDELL to call "everybody braindead" in VALORANT and shitting on almost every NA team that actually grinds the fuck out of this game.
Mate, TSM literally got better when they got rid of you. Read the fucking room.
they are out of vct already and have started practicing scrims not long ago
yes except that instead of being gun buddies is IRL buddies ;(
https://twitter.com/Sentinels/status/1539687455393140737?s=20&t=mGZ-_rjXfdQNzENKqGz7-g
bullying works ig
well I don't think vanity being part of the best team makes his opinion valid and wardell's not, after all, wardell was once part of the best team too. If the problem is that it was talking shit in private and behind people's back then that's fine, but I'm sure that if he had made those statements in stream and they weren't leaked then nobody would be losing their shit like they're doing now
Tbh vanity has said pretty comparable stuff while watch partying, I imagine other pro’s have dms that look 99% like wardell’s
Italian
English
Spanish
A bit of german
Tsm didnt make playoffs lmao
I don't know what type of contract they have, but I'd imagine they are still contracted to them. We probably will know when they're officially out and they make a F/A type of post unless they're already signed / in advanced talks with an org
they're still technically signed and are staying as a team, so I don't think they'd count
when did I disagree with that? Please read carefully, also we don't even know yet if Acend are getting in, let alone for being owned by a gambling company. I assume some orgs with betting sponsors might get in, and I would assume Acend to get in if they had a bigger fanbase and better facilities.
I'm gonna assume you meant to put this under my response.
You put the burden of proof on #24 to prove they aren't match fixing, which is not how the law in almost any country works, so yeah, you kinda did.
What these pros are doing is friendly betting, which I'm pretty sure is legal in most places in the US, and perfectly ok imo. If you want to talk about them being on twitch and streaming to kids, that's a point I will probably agree with, but not the one we're talking about currently
there's a difference with something being "bad" and straight up not allowing it to exist at all. I didn't even push back on his other points, just this one. I can't really tell if you're trolling or just really bad at reading because that's not what I said at all
so unless we prove they aren't match fixing we have to assume they are? what kind of logic is this lmao
I don't know if they will take past achievements as much in consideration, of course, if for example xset wins out for the rest of the year with masters and champions wins I expect them to get in, but the plan for franchising is long term, so they will try to get the orgs with biggest fanbase and that have invested in riot/valorant for a while, because they know that sooner or later those orgs will end up with the better teams (even if they're shit right now like KC or KOI)
people really dont know about the -zera suffix
rito will feel intimidated by kc being able to make a lan with crowd and will not give them a spot
50% far from “hate” tbh, but it says a lot about how busted he is
yes I know, but I don't understand why them supporting m3c is a surprise when they are still their org and have been supporting them since they joined
why do people think m3c aren't contracted to gambit? they're literally gambit players in every way except for the fact that they aren't allowed to call themselves gambit on valorant's stream
how is this news, they were literally on bootcamp
lmao floptic I hadn't heard that one
I don't think you understand what I said; I mean that there are many factors that could be (and almost certainly are) altering the result of this precise analysis, and so we can't really claim it as evidence of anything. Say, for example, this test was to be made at first strike NA where three out of the top 4 teams were 100T, SEN, and TSM, with notable streamers like Hiko, Wardell, Subroza, etc. Or maybe at the masters 3 qualifier.
I don't think you can really use this graph to prove much, the sample size seems very small and there are a lot of things that impact win rate that haven't been considered to make a full comparison. Would love to see a much larger test one day, to see if we can actually get to something
maybe, but cned, starxo, zeek, and maybe even monsteerr are for sure getting in, most people will forget about "acend" as a name quickly just like they don't really think about them now that much
I think 6 man rosters tend to not work because of personal reasons, often a player may feel left out and players may focus their game to secure their spot within the starting players and not for the benefit of the team. Of course, if the players were machines with no emotions it would 100% work out but there’s a human side to everything
If he’s planning on switching he better do it now because next year partnered teams will not want to take such a risk and I doubt he’d want to play in tier2
He owns mwzera thats the only thing you should care about
He’s not saying that chamber isnt busted, hes talking about those 100t fans pretending like if chamber gets nerfed then they become unbeatable because other teams have dedicated op players
People in this site have a memory span of like 3 months, yay was a beast even with jett, and he can still play other agents if his team asks him to like he did on abx.Teams will adapt, and the game will always have a need for good operator players, it doesnt matter if its with chamber, jett, or other agents
I would say drx vs optic but the lower bracket took away some emotion for me
Discord