Daniveus
Flag: Portugal
Registered: April 1, 2021
Last post: December 7, 2024 at 1:17 PM
Posts: 3891
1 •• 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 •• 76

sarcasm

posted about 2 years ago

I enjoy some upsets as well but I feel like they happen way too often

posted about 2 years ago

I am not saying A>B then B>C, I am just arguing that a team like astralis in valorant might not be possible.

posted about 2 years ago

ye how do u justify it? bad days happening all the time, or that this is like pokemon and some teams just counter others. so dumb :))

posted about 2 years ago

but furia didn't lose to fucking sprout before winning against NAVI. they are looking like one of the best teams rn.

posted about 2 years ago

bro stop making it about gambit/g2. g2 lost to fucking lulquid and then beat arguably the best team in the world, like that is some random shit. V1 dominated groups and then lost to 4th seed from other group like how???

posted about 2 years ago

bro I am just comparing it to other games, obviously, there are gonna be teams that stand out and are clearly better. But at this point, I wouldn't be surprised if Optic lost to some random tier 3 team next challengers.

posted about 2 years ago

not that ajax and lyon/tottenham are that far apart, even benfica won against them.
ajax are not that good, idk what to say lmao.

posted about 2 years ago

I am not talking about gambit, just that it happens a lot.
gambit is probably the most consistent team in valorant rn.

posted about 2 years ago

miracles happen but how often????
And M. City might lose some random premier league matches but they would smash them if they played in champions when it matters the most.

posted about 2 years ago

I am not saying it was a fluke, but gambit played better imo, saying this as a fnatic fan.

posted about 2 years ago

Like, how can a team look like complete dogshit one day and be the best the next day?
NO, it doesn't happen in sports.

posted about 2 years ago

?
LG beat V1
FNC beat Gambit (if I'm completely honest I think gambit played better - 0.02)
Liquid beat G2
and now G2 beat Gambit. (like wtf)

posted about 2 years ago

sentinels (fluke wins vs fnatic), gambit and acend have all been eliminated. valorant is a real shit fest. I begin to think u can't really be consistent in this game. worse teams win against better teams way too often.

posted about 2 years ago

g2 looked really good at the end of groups. I thought they would qualify along with fnc and gambit, but this fuckers had to throw against liquid. I'm pissed.

posted about 2 years ago

daily message

posted about 2 years ago

if only they didn't throw against liquid.
like how is that even possible, throwing more than liquid?

posted about 2 years ago

liquid are natural born throwers.
sentinels are streamers.

posted about 2 years ago

making it 8 teams instead of 6 is still preferable

posted about 2 years ago

expected

posted about 2 years ago

Boaster is (culturally, not really) chinese, and Mistic must be half something as well.

posted about 2 years ago

bro idk, I think NA's is better.
I also prefer swiss-system instead of round-robin in groups, but that is just my personal opinion.

posted about 2 years ago

stopped reading @mike_fras on twitter.

posted about 2 years ago

LOUD looks really good, everyone in that team can hit their shots

posted about 2 years ago

It's obvious the team that went 5-0 should go, but I am not pointing that out. What I am saying is that playoffs should matter more than 1 game for any team, even if u went first in groups.
There's a reason most games have an upper and lower bracket system, it's because one game doesn't define consistency. Like fnatic vs gambit could have gone either way, minor mistakes and luck made the difference. Also, one team might have had a super bad/good day and so the final result doesn't define how good a team is.

posted about 2 years ago

ye, It's possible but it would be some weird bracket, like having two upper brackets and two lower brackets. Not the best idea as well.

posted about 2 years ago

u also shouldn't make it to masters by winning only one match in playoffs. It's a trade-off.

posted about 2 years ago

even if #5 doesn't like it. I think seeding is better than this. It should be at least 2 games to qualify, 1 game just doesn't feel right.
Or like #10, make it 8 team playoffs. Even tho I don't like that, for example, teams like LG advanced being negative (2-3). It surely works better than this.

posted about 2 years ago

I know, still 1 game playoffs is dumb

posted about 2 years ago

yes they played one match in playoffs and qualified. It's dumb but whatever

posted about 2 years ago

160k (main twitch + yt)

posted about 2 years ago

NA ego 📉

posted about 2 years ago

fnc m3c and (fpx if they don't choke or liquid if they stop throwing)

posted about 2 years ago

I can't lmfaoooooo

posted about 2 years ago

engh

posted about 2 years ago

I thought they wouldn't even take it off emote only.
rito bunch of softies.

posted about 2 years ago

I'm always existing, but ye there's a lot of them I have never seen...

posted about 2 years ago

they used 3 ults against half-buy tho

posted about 2 years ago

everyone does that already

posted about 2 years ago

fnatic slander

posted about 2 years ago

fnatic 26-0

posted about 2 years ago

daily message

posted about 2 years ago

https://imgur.com/a/UejqrFV
Edit: paint masterclass

posted about 2 years ago

I bet 80k peak
no watch parties in EU

posted about 2 years ago

impossible

posted about 2 years ago

any Italians here?

posted about 2 years ago

based take

posted about 2 years ago

100T wardell

posted about 2 years ago

G2 looked much better in groups tbh

posted about 2 years ago
1 •• 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 •• 76