envyus 2-0
Split overhaul patch
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
295 99 | 22 17 5 | / 14 5 9 / | 6 4 2 | +8 +12 -4 | 165 55 | 24% 35% 10% | 2 2 0 | 1 2 -1 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
249 153 | 21 10 11 | / 12 4 8 / | 6 1 5 | +9 +6 +3 | 205 94 | 29% 25% 32% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |||
|
225 147 | 20 8 12 | / 14 6 8 / | 4 2 2 | +6 +2 +4 | 131 76 | 10% 19% 4% | 1 0 1 | 1 2 -1 | 0 -2 +2 | |||
|
223 129 | 18 12 6 | / 15 5 10 / | 2 1 1 | +3 +7 -4 | 166 70 | 16% 15% 17% | 5 3 2 | 2 0 2 | +3 +3 0 | |||
|
160 99 | 11 4 7 | / 17 7 10 / | 9 5 4 | -6 -3 -3 | 108 65 | 22% 31% 18% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
284 153 | 19 9 10 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 3 2 | +1 0 +1 | 200 104 | 29% 30% 28% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
218 62 | 17 12 5 | / 18 8 10 / | 0 0 0 | -1 +4 -5 | 131 38 | 19% 14% 27% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
175 55 | 11 8 3 | / 19 9 10 / | 7 4 3 | -8 -1 -7 | 111 26 | 17% 26% 5% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
173 41 | 15 12 3 | / 19 9 10 / | 4 4 0 | -4 +3 -7 | 109 27 | 12% 15% 7% | 4 4 0 | 2 1 1 | +2 +3 -1 | |||
|
121 78 | 10 4 6 | / 18 8 10 / | 2 1 1 | -8 -4 -4 | 87 57 | 42% 30% 50% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
273 80 | 36 28 8 | / 22 10 12 / | 17 13 4 | +14 +18 -4 | 161 41 | 23% 24% 20% | 2 2 0 | 2 3 -1 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
264 89 | 31 20 11 | / 25 13 12 / | 16 10 6 | +6 +7 -1 | 152 51 | 23% 26% 19% | 7 3 4 | 4 3 1 | +3 0 +3 | |||
|
248 118 | 37 20 17 | / 22 14 8 / | 10 4 6 | +15 +6 +9 | 185 68 | 35% 31% 40% | 2 1 1 | 5 3 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |||
|
230 90 | 32 20 12 | / 25 15 10 / | 8 5 3 | +7 +5 +2 | 137 48 | 19% 25% 8% | 3 2 1 | 1 2 -1 | +2 0 +2 | |||
|
183 97 | 25 17 8 | / 24 11 13 / | 6 2 4 | +1 +6 -5 | 136 49 | 18% 19% 16% | 7 4 3 | 4 1 3 | +3 +3 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
290 202 | 34 10 24 | / 32 12 20 / | 6 3 3 | +2 -2 +4 | 188 125 | 27% 29% 27% | 5 1 4 | 5 3 2 | 0 -2 +2 | |||
|
216 111 | 27 15 12 | / 33 11 22 / | 1 0 1 | -6 +4 -10 | 128 65 | 26% 19% 33% | 5 1 4 | 5 3 2 | 0 -2 +2 | |||
|
174 96 | 20 9 11 | / 32 12 20 / | 10 5 5 | -12 -3 -9 | 122 66 | 18% 21% 15% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 | |||
|
151 97 | 19 8 11 | / 31 11 20 / | 8 2 6 | -12 -3 -9 | 92 61 | 31% 21% 40% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
138 58 | 18 13 5 | / 33 12 21 / | 12 5 7 | -15 +1 -16 | 96 42 | 11% 18% 5% | 5 4 1 | 3 1 2 | +2 +3 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
367 76 | 20 16 4 | / 8 6 2 / | 7 5 2 | +12 +10 +2 | 217 30 | 24% 24% 21% | 4 2 2 | 1 1 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |||
|
251 53 | 14 11 3 | / 8 5 3 / | 11 9 2 | +6 +6 0 | 155 20 | 22% 15% 100% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
247 67 | 16 10 6 | / 10 10 0 / | 4 3 1 | +6 0 +6 | 156 29 | 44% 36% 71% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
234 7 | 12 12 0 | / 11 9 2 / | 4 3 1 | +1 +3 -2 | 145 7 | 29% 28% 50% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
143 49 | 7 5 2 | / 9 6 3 / | 4 1 3 | -2 -1 -1 | 92 19 | 20% 24% 11% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
295 274 | 15 1 14 | / 14 3 11 / | 1 0 1 | +1 -2 +3 | 171 157 | 24% 20% 25% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |||
|
214 183 | 10 3 7 | / 15 3 12 / | 1 0 1 | -5 0 -5 | 123 105 | 41% 50% 39% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |||
|
181 125 | 9 4 5 | / 13 3 10 / | 6 1 5 | -4 +1 -5 | 99 68 | 21% 14% 29% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
173 154 | 9 1 8 | / 13 3 10 / | 3 1 2 | -4 -2 -2 | 138 126 | 18% 0% 22% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |||
|
102 84 | 3 1 2 | / 14 3 11 / | 8 1 7 | -11 -2 -9 | 78 65 | 10% 50% 4% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
Plebsmeister [#2]another proof that this andbox roster never will be top team, zero defence rounds on icebox lmao
just save android and yay
yay threw many of those rounds though, from the bit that I watched atleast
deva [#3]yay threw many of those rounds though, from the bit that I watched atleast
poach was invincible whole game
if not yay and android that would be 13-5 stomp
Plebsmeister [#4]poach was invincible whole game
if not yay and android that would be 13-5 stomp
it's a team game bro, you can't simply look at frags to decide that. of course the jett and raze would have more frags than other support agents.
if you watch last couple rounds on icebox yay made alot of mistakes, but then again they play envy not some shitty team
deva [#5]it's a team game bro, you can't simply look at frags to decide that. of course the jett and raze would have more frags than other support agents.
if you watch last couple rounds on icebox yay made alot of mistakes, but then again they play envy not some shitty team
im not talking about frags
poach did nothing on ct side, and he basically keeped doing same stuff on t side
Plebsmeister [#4]poach was invincible whole game
if not yay and android that would be 13-5 stomp
you mean invisible ?