After prx and nip, this became a fact. A team that has 2 insabely talented and skilled players should play double duelists.
Grumsy [#3]prx is good but nip ... you good bro?
They lost by a hair to zeta that is a top4 team. What are you talking about?
Easy_for_MWZERA [#4]They lost by a hair to zeta that is a top4 team. What are you talking about?
These aren’t comparable, it’s like this stupid “VK” moral champions argument Brazilians had because they beat Acend, just because Acend were the champions it doesn’t mean VK would’ve beaten every other team as well (maybe there’s a reason to why they didn’t beat X10 huh)
Zeta grew massively during this tournament and it’s noticeable just how much better they are right now than when they went up against nip, so until nip actually wins something significant, they suck ass man
lorenzopajaroFC [#5]These aren’t comparable, it’s like this stupid “VK” moral champions argument Brazilians had because they beat Acend, just because Acend were the champions it doesn’t mean VK would’ve beaten every other team as well (maybe there’s a reason to why they didn’t beat X10 huh)
Zeta grew massively during this tournament and it’s noticeable just how much better they are right now than when they went up against nip, so until nip actually wins something significant, they suck ass man
I'm not saying they would've won the tournament. I'm saying they are a very good team and they play with 2 duelists. Just trying to make the point that if your team is more comfortable playing double duelist the team should go for it, prx and nip proved that.