ABOUT MASTERS FORMAT (THAT SUCKS)

this format sucks..i would rather everyone in a group phase having to lose more than 2 games to be kicked out than ''i lost two matches in difficult play-in group'' - the swiss system format would be perfect.
What do u guys think? like i am happy as fuck that loud got third place but they literally had to win 2 matches...and if they were not in group stage they prob wouldn't have time to practice and we would be like really dependent of the group (strong/weak) - because maybe against teams like Xerxia/PRX/DRX with no time top prepare and all games with high stakes maybe we would no be prepared at alll.

Agree man

Too tired to read whole. But I would say just make it 20 team tournament and copy APAC Challengers format. Would be way better than whatever just happened

Bo0mShell [#3]

Too tired to read whole. But I would say just make it 20 team tournament and copy APAC Challengers format. Would be way better than whatever just happened

i agree, would be sick to have the apac format at least for Champs maybe

i missed the part where thats my prblm

Bo0mShell [#3]

Too tired to read whole. But I would say just make it 20 team tournament and copy APAC Challengers format. Would be way better than whatever just happened

play-in and playoffs but probably will take a month, and this is a major coming to a certain place obviously, Reykjavik, and the visas. so probably not.

the only problem with the format for me is that there is no break for lb finals and the actual finals but oh well thats the advantage of the ub