u cant really say hes a rapist when hes not proven to be a rapist
ok ya lets use ur logic
just cuz i say ur a rapist ur a rapist now
dna evidence linked oj to the muder so we can call him a murderer
he was never proven to be a murderer therefore he is not a murderer according to you
if it was enough proof tell me why he was not convicted? surely if there was plenty of evidence he would be convicted
u know the justice system isnt perfect right
evidence doesnt equal conviction
there as many innocent ppl in jail as there many non convicted guilty ppl
also oj has no part to play in sinatraa getting accused of rape so stop using oj as an argument
him walking free doesnt suggest that sinatraa is or isnt a rapist like u make it seem to be
only thing that can prove sinatraa is a rapist is evidence
with no convincing evidence sinatraa is then not a rapist
i know getting a gf can be hard but u dont need to take the side of all false rape accusers to get their attention
maybe you should go look at the evidence provided againt him and you might realise it is the exact same situation as OJ
dna found on the victim is definitely the exact same as an audio clip that isnt even proven to be sinatraa and theres no context to it either
no point talking to you if you think the only evidence is an audio clip,hf dickriding