100T qualified in close because of Hiko so he isn't allowed to be removed because he is part of the core that qualified from Berlin, which makes them the top 4 from 2021.
jblancard [#4]NOW he is but before dropping ec1s and babyJ they couldve dropped hiko instead of babyj
-h*ko paycheck stealer clown
I actually meant that he isn't allowed because of the rules. Because the core of Ethan Asuna and Hiko is the reason why they are in closed quali
HikageMango [#5]I actually meant that he isn't allowed because of the rules. Because the core of Ethan Asuna and Hiko is the reason why they are in closed quali
no they arent
they literally couldve changed the whole roster before playing the first match if they wanted to
jblancard [#6]no they arent
they literally couldve changed the whole roster before playing the first match if they wanted to
if they did they couldn't play in vct , sinvce they replaced their core
delusional_paperrex_fan [#7]if they did they couldn't play in vct , sinvce they replaced their core
there was no core til they played a match
in brazil vikings got invited to playoffs cause of past results but the whole roster got changed before playing
same rules btw
zzzzz
jblancard [#6]no they arent
they literally couldve changed the whole roster before playing the first match if they wanted to
Actually no because the roster will be different therefore the points they acquired last year will not retain in the 100t thus making them goes through open quali
HikageMango [#9]Actually no because the roster will be different therefore the points they acquired last year will not retain in the 100t thus making them goes through open quali
#8
jblancard [#8]there was no core til they played a match
in brazil vikings got invited to playoffs cause of past results but the whole roster got changed before playing
same rules btw
zzzzz
I'm pretty sure the rules were different, but I have to check.
jblancard [#8]there was no core til they played a match
in brazil vikings got invited to playoffs cause of past results but the whole roster got changed before playing
same rules btw
zzzzz
no because br also invited other teams that didn't qualify last year internationally like Gamelanders Blue
HikageMango [#13]no because br also invited other teams that didn't qualify last year internationally like Gamelanders Blue
where in NA it only invited 4 teams and have 5 representative internationally
HikageMango [#13]no because br also invited other teams that didn't qualify last year internationally like Gamelanders Blue
yes glb didnt qualify internationally for lan last year
but what does this have to do with anything
jblancard [#15]yes glb didnt qualify internationally for lan last year
but what does this have to do with anything
gamelanders got invited right?
edit: yeah i thought so
wkeyspectre [#16]gamelanders got invited right?
edit: yeah i thought so
yes i was wrong and edited it
but what does qualifying for international lan has to do with the invites?
they did good whole year just didnt qualify
jblancard [#17]yes i was wrong and edited it
but what does qualifying for international lan has to do with the invites?
they did good whole year just didnt qualify
I simply meant that NA doesn't have "huge" rostermania or roster to its top teams that is why you can't compare both regions for its rule
HikageMango [#19]I simply meant that NA doesn't have "huge" rostermania or roster to its top teams that is why you can't compare both regions for its rule
that is kinda ironic i know
but hear me out, the BR qualifying system is different compare to NA. They invited 6 teams which is 4 teams in NA, they go through close before group stage and other stuff. That is why I speculated that qualifying internationally have anything to do with it, my bad. But I dont think its right to compare the qualifying system of both regions