TSM vs. BASILISK | Knights Monthly Gauntlet 2022: February | Playoffs | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
corey TSM	1.40 1.67 1.19	298 381 236	22 12 10	/ 11 7 4 /	3 1 2	+11 +5 +6	86% 78% 92%	194 229 168	34% 26% 45%	4 1 3	0 0 0	+4 +1 +3
WARDELL TSM	1.34 0.81 1.74	245 100 355	18 3 15	/ 10 4 6 /	1 0 1	+8 -1 +9	71% 56% 83%	145 56 212	12% 0% 14%	2 0 2	3 2 1	-1 -2 +1
Rossy TSM	1.18 1.08 1.26	185 202 173	16 7 9	/ 9 6 3 /	1 0 1	+7 +1 +6	67% 56% 75%	118 132 106	26% 28% 24%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
LeviathanAG TSM	0.92 1.19 0.72	166 156 174	11 5 6	/ 12 4 8 /	5 1 4	-1 +1 -2	76% 89% 67%	107 83 125	18% 33% 13%	3 2 1	2 0 2	+1 +2 -1
Subroza TSM	0.82 0.56 1.02	176 132 210	12 3 9	/ 16 7 9 /	6 3 3	-4 -4 0	76% 56% 92%	129 90 159	23% 31% 19%	4 1 3	3 3 0	+1 -2 +3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

corey

TSM

1.40 1.67 1.19

298 381 236

22 12 10

/ 11 7 4 /

3 1 2

+11 +5 +6

86% 78% 92%

194 229 168

34% 26% 45%

4 1 3

0 0 0

+4 +1 +3

WARDELL

TSM

1.34 0.81 1.74

245 100 355

18 3 15

/ 10 4 6 /

1 0 1

+8 -1 +9

71% 56% 83%

145 56 212

12% 0% 14%

2 0 2

3 2 1

-1 -2 +1

Rossy

TSM

1.18 1.08 1.26

185 202 173

16 7 9

/ 9 6 3 /

1 0 1

+7 +1 +6

67% 56% 75%

118 132 106

26% 28% 24%

0 0 0

LeviathanAG

TSM

0.92 1.19 0.72

166 156 174

11 5 6

/ 12 4 8 /

5 1 4

-1 +1 -2

76% 89% 67%

107 83 125

18% 33% 13%

3 2 1

2 0 2

+1 +2 -1

Subroza

TSM

0.82 0.56 1.02

176 132 210

12 3 9

/ 16 7 9 /

6 3 3

-4 -4 0

76% 56% 92%

129 90 159

23% 31% 19%

4 1 3

3 3 0

+1 -2 +3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Nanners AI	1.06 0.98 1.16	247 220 283	16 8 8	/ 16 9 7 /	6 5 1	0 -1 +1	67% 67% 67%	169 157 185	17% 18% 17%	2 0 2	6 5 1	-4 -5 +1
duck AI	1.02 1.37 0.55	181 249 90	14 11 3	/ 14 9 5 /	1 1 0	0 +2 -2	57% 58% 56%	109 148 58	37% 31% 67%	5 3 2	1 0 1	+4 +3 +1
ohai AI	0.82 0.80 0.84	180 141 232	12 5 7	/ 17 10 7 /	4 3 1	-5 -5 0	57% 58% 56%	118 99 145	22% 20% 23%	1 0 1	1 0 1	0 0 0
royal AI	0.65 0.62 0.68	133 146 118	11 7 4	/ 16 10 6 /	4 1 3	-5 -3 -2	62% 67% 56%	82 82 83	36% 33% 40%	0 0 0	2 1 1	-2 -1 -1
eVoL AI	0.37 0.03 0.93	57 28 95	5 1 4	/ 16 11 5 /	2 0 2	-11 -10 -1	33% 17% 56%	29 17 44	40% 50% 38%	0 0 0	3 3 0	-3 -3 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Nanners

1.06 0.98 1.16

247 220 283

16 8 8

/ 16 9 7 /

6 5 1

0 -1 +1

67% 67% 67%

169 157 185

17% 18% 17%

2 0 2

6 5 1

-4 -5 +1

duck

1.02 1.37 0.55

181 249 90

14 11 3

/ 14 9 5 /

1 1 0

0 +2 -2

57% 58% 56%

109 148 58

37% 31% 67%

5 3 2

1 0 1

+4 +3 +1

ohai

0.82 0.80 0.84

180 141 232

12 5 7

/ 17 10 7 /

4 3 1

-5 -5 0

57% 58% 56%

118 99 145

22% 20% 23%

1 0 1

0 0 0

royal

0.65 0.62 0.68

133 146 118

11 7 4

/ 16 10 6 /

4 1 3

-5 -3 -2

62% 67% 56%

82 82 83

36% 33% 40%

0 0 0

2 1 1

-2 -1 -1

eVoL

0.37 0.03 0.93

57 28 95

5 1 4

/ 16 11 5 /

2 0 2

-11 -10 -1

33% 17% 56%

29 17 44

40% 50% 38%

0 0 0

3 3 0

-3 -3 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
WARDELL TSM	1.56 1.93 1.70	333 275 377	41 22 19	/ 15 9 6 /	3 2 1	+26 +13 +13	83% 81% 86%	188 168 218	14% 8% 18%	5 2 3	3 2 1	+2 0 +2
corey TSM	1.48 1.09 1.33	303 359 218	38 27 11	/ 21 16 5 /	7 5 2	+17 +11 +6	83% 81% 86%	206 240 155	33% 28% 48%	6 3 3	3 3 0	+3 0 +3
LeviathanAG TSM	1.51 0.92 1.28	252 252 209	29 20 9	/ 18 9 9 /	11 6 5	+11 +11 0	86% 95% 71%	145 144 146	22% 26% 18%	6 4 2	2 0 2	+4 +4 0
Rossy TSM	0.84 1.34 1.04	157 151 181	22 11 11	/ 17 14 3 /	16 15 1	+5 -3 +8	77% 76% 79%	100 92 111	25% 26% 24%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
Subroza TSM	0.60 1.00 0.76	150 140 180	19 10 9	/ 23 14 9 /	8 5 3	-4 -4 0	74% 62% 93%	107 87 136	22% 25% 19%	5 2 3	5 5 0	0 -3 +3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

WARDELL

TSM

1.56 1.93 1.70

333 275 377

41 22 19

/ 15 9 6 /

3 2 1

+26 +13 +13

83% 81% 86%

188 168 218

14% 8% 18%

5 2 3

3 2 1

+2 0 +2

corey

TSM

1.48 1.09 1.33

303 359 218

38 27 11

/ 21 16 5 /

7 5 2

+17 +11 +6

83% 81% 86%

206 240 155

33% 28% 48%

6 3 3

3 3 0

+3 0 +3

LeviathanAG

TSM

1.51 0.92 1.28

252 252 209

29 20 9

/ 18 9 9 /

11 6 5

+11 +11 0

86% 95% 71%

145 144 146

22% 26% 18%

6 4 2

2 0 2

+4 +4 0

Rossy

TSM

0.84 1.34 1.04

157 151 181

22 11 11

/ 17 14 3 /

16 15 1

+5 -3 +8

77% 76% 79%

100 92 111

25% 26% 24%

0 0 0

Subroza

TSM

0.60 1.00 0.76

150 140 180

19 10 9

/ 23 14 9 /

8 5 3

-4 -4 0

74% 62% 93%

107 87 136

22% 25% 19%

5 2 3

5 5 0

0 -3 +3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Nanners AI	0.85 1.25 1.09	262 198 299	27 8 19	/ 29 11 18 /	7 5 2	-2 -3 +1	69% 57% 76%	175 145 195	22% 17% 25%	3 0 3	9 6 3	-6 -6 0
ohai AI	0.90 0.93 0.92	207 158 231	23 7 16	/ 31 12 19 /	6 3 3	-8 -5 -3	60% 64% 57%	132 110 147	23% 30% 20%	3 0 3	2 0 2	+1 0 +1
duck AI	1.18 0.39 0.70	136 218 96	18 11 7	/ 29 11 18 /	2 1 1	-11 0 -11	54% 57% 52%	87 131 58	40% 30% 55%	5 3 2	4 1 3	+1 +2 -1
eVoL AI	0.02 0.82 0.46	90 24 123	11 1 10	/ 29 13 16 /	4 0 4	-18 -12 -6	43% 14% 62%	49 14 72	39% 50% 38%	1 0 1	4 3 1	-3 -3 0
royal AI	0.53 0.44 0.46	119 125 120	15 7 8	/ 31 12 19 /	6 1 5	-16 -5 -11	51% 57% 48%	77 70 82	45% 33% 56%	1 0 1	3 1 2	-2 -1 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Nanners

0.85 1.25 1.09

262 198 299

27 8 19

/ 29 11 18 /

7 5 2

-2 -3 +1

69% 57% 76%

175 145 195

22% 17% 25%

3 0 3

9 6 3

-6 -6 0

ohai

0.90 0.93 0.92

207 158 231

23 7 16

/ 31 12 19 /

6 3 3

-8 -5 -3

60% 64% 57%

132 110 147

23% 30% 20%

3 0 3

2 0 2

+1 0 +1

duck

1.18 0.39 0.70

136 218 96

18 11 7

/ 29 11 18 /

2 1 1

-11 0 -11

54% 57% 52%

87 131 58

40% 30% 55%

5 3 2

4 1 3

+1 +2 -1

eVoL

0.02 0.82 0.46

90 24 123

11 1 10

/ 29 13 16 /

4 0 4

-18 -12 -6

43% 14% 62%

49 14 72

39% 50% 38%

1 0 1

4 3 1

-3 -3 0

royal

0.53 0.44 0.46

119 125 120

15 7 8

/ 31 12 19 /

6 1 5

-16 -5 -11

51% 57% 48%

77 70 82

45% 33% 56%

1 0 1

3 1 2

-2 -1 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
WARDELL TSM	2.25 2.11 3.06	421 406 511	23 19 4	/ 5 5 0 /	2 2 0	+18 +14 +4	100% 100% 100%	252 252 251	15% 9% 25%	3 2 1	0 0 0	+3 +2 +1
LeviathanAG TSM	1.80 1.75 2.14	338 325 418	18 15 3	/ 6 5 1 /	6 5 1	+12 +10 +2	100% 100% 100%	201 190 269	26% 24% 38%	3 2 1	0 0 0	+3 +2 +1
corey TSM	1.22 1.34 0.52	308 342 109	16 15 1	/ 10 9 1 /	4 4 0	+6 +6 0	79% 83% 50%	223 248 77	33% 30% 67%	2 2 0	3 3 0	-1 -1 0
Rossy TSM	0.83 0.67 1.80	128 113 228	6 4 2	/ 8 8 0 /	15 15 0	-2 -4 +2	93% 92% 100%	73 62 140	25% 25% 25%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
Subroza TSM	0.67 0.64 0.86	124 146	7 7 0	/ 7 7 0 /	2 2 0	0 0	71% 67% 100%	73 85	20% 20%	1 1 0	2 2 0	-1 -1 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

WARDELL

TSM

2.25 2.11 3.06

421 406 511

23 19 4

/ 5 5 0 /

2 2 0

+18 +14 +4

100% 100% 100%

252 252 251

15% 9% 25%

3 2 1

0 0 0

+3 +2 +1

LeviathanAG

TSM

1.80 1.75 2.14

338 325 418

18 15 3

/ 6 5 1 /

6 5 1

+12 +10 +2

100% 100% 100%

201 190 269

26% 24% 38%

3 2 1

0 0 0

+3 +2 +1

corey

TSM

1.22 1.34 0.52

308 342 109

16 15 1

/ 10 9 1 /

4 4 0

+6 +6 0

79% 83% 50%

223 248 77

33% 30% 67%

2 2 0

3 3 0

-1 -1 0

Rossy

TSM

0.83 0.67 1.80

128 113 228

6 4 2

/ 8 8 0 /

15 15 0

-2 -4 +2

93% 92% 100%

73 62 140

25% 25% 25%

0 0 0

Subroza

TSM

0.67 0.64 0.86

124 146

7 7 0

/ 7 7 0 /

2 2 0

0 0

71% 67% 100%

73 85

20% 20%

1 1 0

2 2 0

-1 -1 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Nanners AI	1.14 0.03 1.32	276 71 311	11 0 11	/ 13 2 11 /	1 0 1	-2 -2 0	71% 0% 83%	184 71 203	29% 0% 30%	1 0 1	3 1 2	-2 -1 -1
ohai AI	1.06 1.50 0.99	234 263 230	11 2 9	/ 14 2 12 /	2 0 2	-3 0 -3	64% 100% 58%	153 179 148	24% 100% 17%	2 0 2	1 0 1	+1 0 +1
eVoL AI	0.59 0.01 0.74	123 0 144	6 0 6	/ 13 2 11 /	2 0 2	-7 -2 -5	57% 0% 67%	79 0 93	38% 38%	1 0 1	1 0 1	0 0 0
duck AI	0.23 0.02 0.27	90 27 101	4 0 4	/ 15 2 13 /	1 0 1	-11 -2 -9	50% 50% 50%	54 27 58	47% 0% 50%	0 0 0	3 1 2	-3 -1 -2
royal AI	0.18 0.01 0.26	104 0 122	4 0 4	/ 15 2 13 /	2 0 2	-11 -2 -9	36% 0% 42%	69 0 81	75% 75%	1 0 1	1 0 1	0 0 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Nanners

1.14 0.03 1.32

276 71 311

11 0 11

/ 13 2 11 /

1 0 1

-2 -2 0

71% 0% 83%

184 71 203

29% 0% 30%

1 0 1

3 1 2

-2 -1 -1

ohai

1.06 1.50 0.99

234 263 230

11 2 9

/ 14 2 12 /

2 0 2

-3 0 -3

64% 100% 58%

153 179 148

24% 100% 17%

2 0 2

1 0 1

+1 0 +1

eVoL

0.59 0.01 0.74

123 0 144

6 0 6

/ 13 2 11 /

2 0 2

-7 -2 -5

57% 0% 67%

79 0 93

38% 38%

1 0 1

0 0 0

duck

0.23 0.02 0.27

90 27 101

4 0 4

/ 15 2 13 /

1 0 1

-11 -2 -9

50% 50% 50%

54 27 58

47% 0% 50%

0 0 0

3 1 2

-3 -1 -2

royal

0.18 0.01 0.26

104 0 122

4 0 4

/ 15 2 13 /

2 0 2

-11 -2 -9

36% 0% 42%

69 0 81

75% 75%

1 0 1

0 0 0

#13

Tzuyu

Frags

–

TSM 2-0 Rossy and Wardaddy shut it down like usual.

#14

Ryker

Frags

–

tsm won??

#15

Rimuru_T

-1

Frags

–

how is aleko still on the team WTF

#16

CalypsoGHC

Frags

–

shush hater

#17

NA_KEKW

Frags

–

lmao literally every post i've seen of you is just on how bad aleko is, stats aren't everything, im pretty sure aleko is the igl for the team

#18

Rimuru_T

Frags

–

no it isnt, subroza is the igl, btw im not looking at stats, literally watched every game

#19

juno_VLR

Frags

–

a) no it's subroza, used to be rossy.
b) aleko is a great sova, questionable viper only because he takes a TON of risks in first duels. sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. luckily playstyle can be learned, and his aim is decent enough. i personally think he's the weak link, especially on viper, but he has a lot of impact that I can't see as a mere viewer.

#23

Rimuru_T

Frags

–

tbh it doesnt work most of the times, he loses most of his aim duels/first duels which the team has to play 4v5 a lot of the times

#20

dapoorv

Frags

–

No subroza is the igl. I don't know about the mid round calls etc. Also his sova is pretty good, just needs to work on his viper a bit.

#21

juno_VLR

Frags

–

yes, that's the common/correct view on him. tsm doesn't NEED him to take so many first duels, but sometimes it works and is super helpful. but when it doesn't work... high impact.