Cloud9 vs. 100 Thieves | Champions Tour North America Stage 1: Challengers | Group Stage | Valorant match

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
leaf C9	1.04 0.63 1.43	220 193 246	18 7 11	/ 16 10 6 /	4 1 3	+2 -3 +5	74% 64% 83%	159 139 177	22% 19% 24%	1 1 0	3 2 1	-2 -1 -1
xeta C9	1.02 1.01 1.02	150 187 117	13 7 6	/ 13 8 5 /	3 3 0	0 -1 +1	83% 82% 83%	117 144 93	26% 35% 17%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
mitch C9	0.99 1.17 0.82	167 246 96	13 9 4	/ 12 7 5 /	4 3 1	+1 +2 -1	78% 82% 75%	115 174 60	19% 24% 10%	3 1 2	2 0 2	+1 +1 0
vanity C9	0.94 0.56 1.28	215 162 265	17 6 11	/ 17 10 7 /	9 4 5	0 -4 +4	83% 82% 83%	133 96 168	8% 6% 8%	3 0 3	1 1 0	+2 -1 +3
Xeppaa C9	0.89 0.46 1.29	238 118 349	20 5 15	/ 18 9 9 /	1 0 1	+2 -4 +6	61% 36% 83%	149 77 216	13% 6% 15%	5 1 4	5 5 0	0 -4 +4

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

leaf

1.04 0.63 1.43

220 193 246

18 7 11

/ 16 10 6 /

4 1 3

+2 -3 +5

74% 64% 83%

159 139 177

22% 19% 24%

1 1 0

3 2 1

-2 -1 -1

xeta

1.02 1.01 1.02

150 187 117

13 7 6

/ 13 8 5 /

3 3 0

0 -1 +1

83% 82% 83%

117 144 93

26% 35% 17%

0 0 0

mitch

0.99 1.17 0.82

167 246 96

13 9 4

/ 12 7 5 /

4 3 1

+1 +2 -1

78% 82% 75%

115 174 60

19% 24% 10%

3 1 2

2 0 2

+1 +1 0

vanity

0.94 0.56 1.28

215 162 265

17 6 11

/ 17 10 7 /

9 4 5

0 -4 +4

83% 82% 83%

133 96 168

8% 6% 8%

3 0 3

1 1 0

+2 -1 +3

Xeppaa

0.89 0.46 1.29

238 118 349

20 5 15

/ 18 9 9 /

1 0 1

+2 -4 +6

61% 36% 83%

149 77 216

13% 6% 15%

5 1 4

5 5 0

0 -4 +4

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Inspire 100T	1.15 1.17 1.13	172 196 148	13 8 5	/ 14 8 6 /	8 3 5	-1 0 -1	70% 58% 82%	141 160 120	33% 44% 23%	2 1 1	1 1 0	+1 0 +1
Hiko 100T	1.12 0.80 1.47	192 141 249	16 5 11	/ 13 9 4 /	6 4 2	+3 -4 +7	78% 75% 82%	112 92 133	24% 22% 26%	2 0 2	0 0 0	+2 0 +2
Asuna 100T	1.07 0.91 1.24	214 222 205	18 9 9	/ 17 10 7 /	3 1 2	+1 -1 +2	74% 67% 82%	133 137 130	18% 23% 13%	3 1 2	6 5 1	-3 -4 +1
ec1s 100T	0.90 0.60 1.23	188 136 246	15 5 10	/ 17 10 7 /	6 2 4	-2 -5 +3	65% 42% 91%	114 85 146	11% 15% 9%	1 1 0	1 0 1	0 +1 -1
Ethan 100T	0.86 0.64 1.09	193 131 262	14 5 9	/ 20 10 10 /	10 3 7	-6 -5 -1	70% 75% 64%	129 84 178	26% 67% 16%	3 0 3	4 3 1	-1 -3 +2

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Inspire

100T

1.15 1.17 1.13

172 196 148

13 8 5

/ 14 8 6 /

8 3 5

-1 0 -1

70% 58% 82%

141 160 120

33% 44% 23%

2 1 1

1 1 0

+1 0 +1

Hiko

100T

1.12 0.80 1.47

192 141 249

16 5 11

/ 13 9 4 /

6 4 2

+3 -4 +7

78% 75% 82%

112 92 133

24% 22% 26%

2 0 2

0 0 0

+2 0 +2

Asuna

100T

1.07 0.91 1.24

214 222 205

18 9 9

/ 17 10 7 /

3 1 2

+1 -1 +2

74% 67% 82%

133 137 130

18% 23% 13%

3 1 2

6 5 1

-3 -4 +1

ec1s

100T

0.90 0.60 1.23

188 136 246

15 5 10

/ 17 10 7 /

6 2 4

-2 -5 +3

65% 42% 91%

114 85 146

11% 15% 9%

1 1 0

1 0 1

0 +1 -1

Ethan

100T

0.86 0.64 1.09

193 131 262

14 5 9

/ 20 10 10 /

10 3 7

-6 -5 -1

70% 75% 64%

129 84 178

26% 67% 16%

3 0 3

4 3 1

-1 -3 +2

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Xeppaa C9	1.17 0.85 1.53	280 215 350	42 17 25	/ 30 17 13 /	11 8 3	+12 0 +12	74% 65% 84%	168 133 211	22% 25% 20%	8 3 5	5 5 0	+3 -2 +5
leaf C9	1.05 0.69 1.50	218 183 261	32 14 18	/ 28 19 9 /	12 6 6	+4 -5 +9	74% 65% 84%	149 123 180	24% 22% 27%	6 5 1	6 5 1	0 0 0
xeta C9	1.05 1.11 0.95	153 187 111	25 16 9	/ 21 13 8 /	8 6 2	+4 +3 +1	81% 83% 79%	105 127 79	21% 28% 11%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
vanity C9	1.02 0.74 1.35	202 163 253	30 14 16	/ 27 17 10 /	13 5 8	+3 -3 +6	74% 65% 84%	124 97 156	9% 9% 9%	8 2 6	1 1 0	+7 +1 +6
mitch C9	0.92 0.85 1.13	157 169 145	23 13 10	/ 23 15 8 /	6 3 3	0 -2 +2	69% 65% 74%	103 117 87	16% 21% 9%	4 1 3	4 1 3	0 0 0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Xeppaa

1.17 0.85 1.53

280 215 350

42 17 25

/ 30 17 13 /

11 8 3

+12 0 +12

74% 65% 84%

168 133 211

22% 25% 20%

8 3 5

5 5 0

+3 -2 +5

leaf

1.05 0.69 1.50

218 183 261

32 14 18

/ 28 19 9 /

12 6 6

+4 -5 +9

74% 65% 84%

149 123 180

24% 22% 27%

6 5 1

0 0 0

xeta

1.05 1.11 0.95

153 187 111

25 16 9

/ 21 13 8 /

8 6 2

+4 +3 +1

81% 83% 79%

105 127 79

21% 28% 11%

0 0 0

vanity

1.02 0.74 1.35

202 163 253

30 14 16

/ 27 17 10 /

13 5 8

+3 -3 +6

74% 65% 84%

124 97 156

9% 9% 9%

8 2 6

1 1 0

+7 +1 +6

mitch

0.92 0.85 1.13

157 169 145

23 13 10

/ 23 15 8 /

6 3 3

0 -2 +2

69% 65% 74%

103 117 87

16% 21% 9%

4 1 3

0 0 0

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Asuna 100T	1.22 0.78 1.51	240 196 272	38 13 25	/ 30 17 13 /	5 1 4	+8 -4 +12	71% 53% 87%	146 115 172	19% 23% 16%	6 1 5	9 7 2	-3 -6 +3
Hiko 100T	0.97 0.70 1.20	172 134 208	23 8 15	/ 27 16 11 /	17 5 12	-4 -8 +4	71% 68% 74%	113 88 133	28% 24% 31%	2 0 2	1 0 1	+1 0 +1
Inspire 100T	0.89 1.08 0.77	139 193 102	21 13 8	/ 28 14 14 /	9 4 5	-7 -1 -6	57% 53% 61%	105 136 80	31% 42% 22%	2 1 1	3 1 2	-1 0 -1
Ethan 100T	0.88 0.42 1.20	193 129 247	26 8 18	/ 35 17 18 /	14 4 10	-9 -9 0	64% 63% 65%	127 91 156	24% 48% 18%	4 0 4	6 4 2	-2 -4 +2
ec1s 100T	0.76 0.45 1.02	152 126 180	21 6 15	/ 32 17 15 /	12 7 5	-11 -11 0	67% 53% 78%	103 89 114	14% 20% 11%	2 2 0	7 3 4	-5 -1 -4

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Asuna

100T

1.22 0.78 1.51

240 196 272

38 13 25

/ 30 17 13 /

5 1 4

+8 -4 +12

71% 53% 87%

146 115 172

19% 23% 16%

6 1 5

9 7 2

-3 -6 +3

Hiko

100T

0.97 0.70 1.20

172 134 208

23 8 15

/ 27 16 11 /

17 5 12

-4 -8 +4

71% 68% 74%

113 88 133

28% 24% 31%

2 0 2

1 0 1

+1 0 +1

Inspire

100T

0.89 1.08 0.77

139 193 102

21 13 8

/ 28 14 14 /

9 4 5

-7 -1 -6

57% 53% 61%

105 136 80

31% 42% 22%

2 1 1

3 1 2

-1 0 -1

Ethan

100T

0.88 0.42 1.20

193 129 247

26 8 18

/ 35 17 18 /

14 4 10

-9 -9 0

64% 63% 65%

127 91 156

24% 48% 18%

4 0 4

6 4 2

-2 -4 +2

ec1s

100T

0.76 0.45 1.02

152 126 180

21 6 15

/ 32 17 15 /

12 7 5

-11 -11 0

67% 53% 78%

103 89 114

14% 20% 11%

2 2 0

7 3 4

-5 -1 -4

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Xeppaa C9	1.44 1.24 1.78	321 303 353	22 12 10	/ 12 8 4 /	10 8 2	+10 +4 +6	89% 92% 86%	191 184 202	32% 33% 29%	3 2 1	0 0 0	+3 +2 +1
vanity C9	1.11 0.93 1.41	189 164 232	13 8 5	/ 10 7 3 /	4 1 3	+3 +1 +2	63% 50% 86%	112 98 136	12% 13% 12%	5 2 3	0 0 0	+5 +2 +3
xeta C9	1.09 1.21 0.89	155 187 103	12 9 3	/ 8 5 3 /	5 3 2	+4 +4 0	79% 83% 71%	91 112 54	12% 19% 0%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
leaf C9	1.06 0.76 1.57	215 174 285	14 7 7	/ 12 9 3 /	8 5 3	+2 -2 +4	74% 67% 86%	137 109 184	28% 25% 31%	5 4 1	3 3 0	+2 +1 +1
mitch C9	0.86 0.52 1.44	146 99 229	10 4 6	/ 11 8 3 /	2 0 2	-1 -4 +3	58% 50% 71%	89 64 133	9% 12% 6%	1 0 1	2 1 1	-1 -1 0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Xeppaa

1.44 1.24 1.78

321 303 353

22 12 10

/ 12 8 4 /

10 8 2

+10 +4 +6

89% 92% 86%

191 184 202

32% 33% 29%

3 2 1

0 0 0

+3 +2 +1

vanity

1.11 0.93 1.41

189 164 232

13 8 5

/ 10 7 3 /

4 1 3

+3 +1 +2

63% 50% 86%

112 98 136

12% 13% 12%

5 2 3

0 0 0

+5 +2 +3

xeta

1.09 1.21 0.89

155 187 103

12 9 3

/ 8 5 3 /

5 3 2

+4 +4 0

79% 83% 71%

91 112 54

12% 19% 0%

0 0 0

leaf

1.06 0.76 1.57

215 174 285

14 7 7

/ 12 9 3 /

8 5 3

+2 -2 +4

74% 67% 86%

137 109 184

28% 25% 31%

5 4 1

3 3 0

+2 +1 +1

mitch

0.86 0.52 1.44

146 99 229

10 4 6

/ 11 8 3 /

2 0 2

-1 -4 +3

58% 50% 71%

89 64 133

9% 12% 6%

1 0 1

2 1 1

-1 -1 0

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Asuna 100T	1.37 0.66 1.78	265 150 333	20 4 16	/ 13 7 6 /	2 0 2	+7 -3 +10	68% 29% 92%	162 79 211	19% 20% 19%	3 0 3	3 2 1	0 -2 +2
Ethan 100T	0.91 0.21 1.31	193 125 233	12 3 9	/ 15 7 8 /	4 1 3	-3 -4 +1	58% 43% 67%	124 103 137	21% 22% 21%	1 0 1	2 1 1	-1 -1 0
Hiko 100T	0.81 0.60 0.94	152 122 171	7 3 4	/ 14 7 7 /	11 1 10	-7 -4 -3	63% 57% 67%	114 82 134	33% 27% 37%	0 0 0	1 0 1	-1 0 -1
Inspire 100T	0.63 0.99 0.42	106 188 59	8 5 3	/ 14 6 8 /	1 1 0	-6 -1 -5	42% 43% 42%	61 94 42	26% 38% 18%	0 0 0	2 0 2	-2 0 -2
ec1s 100T	0.62 0.31 0.80	115 108 119	6 1 5	/ 15 7 8 /	6 5 1	-9 -6 -3	68% 71% 67%	89 96 85	21% 30% 16%	1 1 0	6 3 3	-5 -2 -3

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Asuna

100T

1.37 0.66 1.78

265 150 333

20 4 16

/ 13 7 6 /

2 0 2

+7 -3 +10

68% 29% 92%

162 79 211

19% 20% 19%

3 0 3

3 2 1

0 -2 +2

Ethan

100T

0.91 0.21 1.31

193 125 233

12 3 9

/ 15 7 8 /

4 1 3

-3 -4 +1

58% 43% 67%

124 103 137

21% 22% 21%

1 0 1

2 1 1

-1 -1 0

Hiko

100T

0.81 0.60 0.94

152 122 171

7 3 4

/ 14 7 7 /

11 1 10

-7 -4 -3

63% 57% 67%

114 82 134

33% 27% 37%

0 0 0

1 0 1

-1 0 -1

Inspire

100T

0.63 0.99 0.42

106 188 59

8 5 3

/ 14 6 8 /

1 1 0

-6 -1 -5

42% 43% 42%

61 94 42

26% 38% 18%

0 0 0

2 0 2

-2 0 -2

ec1s

100T

0.62 0.31 0.80

115 108 119

6 1 5

/ 15 7 8 /

6 5 1

-9 -6 -3

68% 71% 67%

89 96 85

21% 30% 16%

1 1 0

6 3 3

-5 -2 -3

#98

dreamyy

-5

Frags

–

100t 2-0

#101

noah919

Frags

–

#99

higuy

-6

Frags

–

100t is washed

#100

Icysoda57

Frags

–

Lol 1head take

#102

Mik0

Frags

–

100T just needs to work on their split. We'll see what they have for the other maps. Let's be reasonable here

#103

bagul

Frags

–

Thought 100t did ok, lets see what they can do on their map. Checked the maps and 100T picked split. gg morons
C9 2-0

#105

Dama

Frags

–

Gg C9 comp diff both maps -

#106

VALoka

Frags

–

100t shit comps

#107

Aqr8

-3

Frags

–

ok cool experiment with ec1s. now kick him.

#108

xMadsx

Frags

–

This was sad... big 100T fan and I got kicked down... I atleast thought it would be close but... ohk then

#109

bloodysky

Frags

–

Poor Asuna

#111

Skyss

-5

Frags

–

Bring back dicey, steel and nitro

#112

juno_VLR

-2

Frags

–

100t fans already getting a taste of what they gave tsm fans last couple weeks. but hey, at least your loss was against a tier 1 team.

100t should have been playing NSG tourneys too, it seems. First ever competition with that roster and it’s in the groups stage of a main event.

#114

nocham

Frags

–

ec1s wasn't in the US for a long time. They said if he didn't have visa issues, they would have been in NSG matches. TSM, on the other hand, just didn't.

#124

Mik0

Frags

–

Bro even though I think 100T fans are cringe, their banter made sense because they are good. They get 2-0 by Carpe and it was funny, but they bounced back and made it to Berlin. TSM just flumped throughout the VCT and won 1 challenger event but couldn't make it past that when competing against the cream of the crop of NA at the time. Simply that performance was a honeymoon. When they made roster changes, they didn't pop off initially but slowly built themselves to something better with the addition of Ethan and role swaps.

#113

shaionpc

Frags

–

nt thats it.

#116

phenomen

Frags

–

#saveasuna

#118

_Blank_

Frags

–

Love how everybody thinks that NRG, Knights, V1, Akrew and such teams are bad when playing against C9 but good in any other match

#119

TARIK_GOAT

Frags

–

nt legend Ethan

#122

ciro

Frags

–

dexter sadge

#123

FsuJordan

Frags

–

100t’s split looked good at times on cat a few errors cost them the map. But the agent pool on breeze landing on cypher and no Kayo is a bad look but luckily it was their first match as a whole best of luck to them. C9 is strong but needs to maintain the consistency of their play if they want to qualify for Iceland.