- emea( eu>cis>tr)
- kr
- na (dont have faith in the existing tier 1)
- sea
- latam + br(kru doesnt represent the entire region)
- jp
- rest of apac
- Oceania omega lul
- mena( rip anubis)
- iron lobbies
0
regional valorant rankings(imo)
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
ciro [#5]KR too too high
in masters 1 it will be just fine, content creation region isn't above them
darksiders212 [#11]kr??? na??? they are so bad the results from champion and the open qualifiers prove that
1 emea
2 sea
3 latam one team region kru
4 na
kr
sea and kru proved themselves and they are hardworker not like na just for content and kr its overrated by many people
Dest1ny [#13]KR are shit, VS haven't achieved anything and they're the only good team to come out of the region, way overhyped for their utility even when they got out stratted by fnatic
they didnt even get out of grp
Dest1ny [#13]KR are shit, VS haven't achieved anything and they're the only good team to come out of the region, way overhyped for their utility even when they got out stratted by fnatic
NU was 3rd in iceland bro.
champions was a bad tourney for VS.
and in berlin after qualifying they faced gambit(who were expected to win berlin)
darksiders212 [#11]kr??? na??? they are so bad the results from champion and the open qualifiers prove that
1 emea
2 sea
3 latam one team region kru
4 na
kr
ur list is similar to mine before giving more thought
roaree [#18]nah emea, na, sea, latam, kr, br, jp ,sa,
never seen oce play but probably about the same level as sa
better, soniqs is doing just fine in na, maybe i shouldnt consider it that way but yeah,
Why keep posting this kind of post, they are all the same
Emea:1
NA: 2nd to 4th - topic: shazam, not tier1 team
LATAM: 2nd to 4th - topic: KRU one slot region one team region, BR
BR: 3rd to 5 - topic: we will see, mwzera
KR: 2nd to 5 Th - topic: too high
SEA: 3th to 5th - topic: why too low
JP: above to OCE
toofan1 [#15]u mean china?
omegalul
if china was into fps more, ez champs every year. but tht didnt happen
toofan1 [#20]NU was 3rd in iceland bro.
champions was a bad tourney for VS.
and in berlin after qualifying they faced gambit(who were expected to win berlin)
and sen was 1st in iceland
Kr1zt [#24]Why keep posting this kind of post, they are all the same
Emea:1
NA: 2nd to 4th - topic: shazam, not tier1 team
LATAM: 2nd to 4th - topic: KRU one slot region one team region, BR
BR: 3rd to 5 - topic: we will see, mwzera
KR: 2nd to 5 Th - topic: too high
SEA: 3th to 5th - topic: why too low
JP: above to OCE
brazil 3rd -5? along with sea?
u must be capping
bandwagondestroyer [#22]ur list is similar to mine before giving more thought
no not similar u did put na n3 and kr 2 tthat is a bigg diff
toofan1 [#20]NU was 3rd in iceland bro.
champions was a bad tourney for VS.
and in berlin after qualifying they faced gambit(who were expected to win berlin)
there is no bad tourney they played at their bbest but the other team was just the better one thats it if u see all the players are hitting their shots and the calls on point and all of that its not a bad game or tourney . they got team diff
bandwagondestroyer [#25]if china was into fps more, ez champs every year. but tht didnt happen
rofl...lol
toofan1 [#20]NU was 3rd in iceland bro.
champions was a bad tourney for VS.
and in berlin after qualifying they faced gambit(who were expected to win berlin)
Ill take the L on NU, i forgot they were even a team for a minute, but wtf are your other points??????
You're saying the reasoning why they should be 2nd best region while going out in groups at champs is "bad event"? you cant say kr is 2nd best region and say they had a "bad event" when pushed further on why they were shit at the biggest event of the year,
also the "they were good but they went up against gambit" point is so dumb, if you can't stick with the top dogs, leave
+nice username
0/8
Dest1ny [#40]Ill take the L on NU, i forgot they were even a team for a minute, but wtf are your other points??????
You're saying the reasoning why they should be 2nd best region while going out in groups at champs is "bad event"? you cant say kr is 2nd best region and say they had a "bad event" when pushed further on why they were shit at the biggest event of the year,
also the "they were good but they went up against gambit" point is so dumb, if you can't stick with the top dogs, leave+nice username
0/8
when did i say they were 2nd best region
darksiders212 [#11]kr??? na??? they are so bad the results from champion and the open qualifiers prove that
1 emea
2 sea
3 latam one team region kru
4 na
kr
Imagine putting SEA over NA lmao
Discord