- Envy
- C9
- Sentinels
- Rise
- 100T
based on current results
0
TOP 5 NA TEAMS (UNBIASED)
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
kristof [#4]wrong
Nah you wrong. Based on current results 100t was still better than rise. Rise had one good online tournament the whole damn year. So right now we don’t know enough about 100t to say they’d be better but based off current results? 100t still better than rise.
Deadpanmitten94 [#6]Nah you wrong. Based on current results 100t was still better than rise. Rise had one good online tournament the whole damn year. So right now we don’t know enough about 100t to say they’d be better but based off current results? 100t still better than rise.
nah bro based on current results Rise is better.
if 100T was better they wouldnt have lost to Rise.
kristof [#7]nah bro based on current results Rise is better.
if 100T was better they wouldnt have lost to Rise.
actually braindead
current results mean 1 event?
arecyc [#10]c9 and sen both did better at champs than envy wtf u talking about
c9 got easy group
sentinels literally finished on the same place as envy.
kristof [#7]nah bro based on current results Rise is better.
if 100T was better they wouldnt have lost to Rise.
I think you forget about how fucked up the tournament was. 100t had already played played 2 series when riot shat themselves by having the tourney in cali and delayed it for over 2 weeks. So in other words rise had 2 weeks to prep for 100t specifically when 100t had next to no vods of rise to prepare for.
I’m not inherently saying that 100t would have beat rise had the tourney not been delayed but 100t would have beaten them. It would be ignorant to say that 100t wasn’t put at a MAJOR disadvantage by delaying the tournament for that long. c9 prob still takes it either way but 100t still got boned.
kristof [#11]c9 got easy group
sentinels literally finished on the same place as envy.
I thought you said based on current results lmfao cringe ass
kristof [#11]c9 got easy group
sentinels literally finished on the same place as envy.
NV lost to X10 get off the COPIUM
kristof [#15]sentinels lost to kru and envy
Kru were a round away from being in the finals plus beat fnatic who beat your precious number 1 C9
kristof [#15]sentinels lost to kru and envy
Bro in case you didn’t watch the tournament kru got 3-4 so the argument of sen losing to a bad team is legitimately dumb as shit
delusional_sentinels_fan1 [#16]Kru were a round away from being in the finals plus beat fnatic who beat your precious number 1 C9
c9 is not number 1 for me.
if x10 got fnatic and kru gambit in the quarter finals, x10 would have made into the semis and not kru
so get off the copium
Deadpanmitten94 [#17]Bro in case you didn’t watch the tournament kru got 3-4 so the argument of sen losing to a bad team is legitimately dumb as shit
cuz kru got an easy team in the top 8 dumbass. if they got gambit like x10 did kru would have went home and x10 would be in top 4
kristof [#7]nah bro based on current results Rise is better.
if 100T was better they wouldnt have lost to Rise.
thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard
kristof [#18]c9 is not number 1 for me.
if x10 got fnatic and kru gambit in the quarter finals, x10 would have made into the semis and not kru
so get off the copium
that’s a lot of ifs for someone claiming to be going off of current results so stop riding yourself
kristof [#19]cuz kru got an easy team in the top 8 dumbass. if they got gambit like x10 did kru would have went home and x10 would be in top 4
You are mentally incapable of seeing logic
Deadpanmitten94 [#12]I think you forget about how fucked up the tournament was. 100t had already played played 2 series when riot shat themselves by having the tourney in cali and delayed it for over 2 weeks. So in other words rise had 2 weeks to prep for 100t specifically when 100t had next to no vods of rise to prepare for.
I’m not inherently saying that 100t would have beat rise had the tourney not been delayed but 100t would have beaten them. It would be ignorant to say that 100t wasn’t put at a MAJOR disadvantage by delaying the tournament for that long. c9 prob still takes it either way but 100t still got boned.
everyone was in the same shoes, u cant say 100T lost cuz of that.
plus they had enough time to prepare for rise as well
Deadpanmitten94 [#22]You are mentally incapable of seeing logic
ur too bias
you saw that kru lost to gambit right?
the same thing wouldve happened in the top 8 as well if kru got gambit
Deadpanmitten94 [#13]I thought you said based on current results lmfao cringe ass
getting top 8 in champs is a bigger achievement than getting 2nd place in berlin you think?
kristof [#23]everyone was in the same shoes, u cant say 100T lost cuz of that.
plus they had enough time to prepare for rise as well
Did you read anything i said you h0e. Vods of rise ~0. Vods of 100t >10.
So no actually. You’re wrong. Everyone was not in the same shoes. Because not everyone had played in the tournament yet. Only half the teams had.
kristof [#26]getting top 8 in champs is a bigger achievement than getting 2nd place in berlin you think?
But you said current results. And current results c9 finished higher than NV. Therefore based off current results, c9>NV. Not based off current results I agree NV>c9. But you gotta pick an argument here. Are you going off current results or not? You keep flip-flopping. Choose.
kristof [#24]ur too bias
you saw that kru lost to gambit right?
the same thing wouldve happened in the top 8 as well if kru got gambit
But they didn’t sooooo based off current results
kristof [#24]ur too bias
you saw that kru lost to gambit right?
the same thing wouldve happened in the top 8 as well if kru got gambit
fnatic beat C9 so KRU > FNATIC > C9
also ACE beat gambit so if that had happened in semis by your logic that would mean gambit are top 8???
kristof [#26]getting top 8 in champs is a bigger achievement than getting 2nd place in berlin you think?
And getting 3-4 by beating the top 2 eu teams was bigger than an lcq. Follow your own logic.
squush [#25]bro has rise above 100T because of one game as if 100T didnt come 3-4 at berlin
Yeah this guy is tweakin
Deadpanmitten94 [#27]Did you read anything i said you h0e. Vods of rise ~0. Vods of 100t >10.
So no actually. You’re wrong. Everyone was not in the same shoes. Because not everyone had played in the tournament yet. Only half the teams had.
vods are not the only thing that can prepare a team dumbass. 100t could have watched rise’s vods against faze and cloud9
plus 100t just changed their igl before that event so the vods they from previous tournament was not really relative…
kristof [#34]vods are not the only thing that can prepare a team dumbass. 100t could have watched rise’s vods against faze and cloud9
plus 100t just changed their igl before that event so the vods they from previous tournament was not really relative…
But their strata were revealed in the first two series whereas none of rise’s strats were revealed.
Deadpanmitten94 [#29]But you said current results. And current results c9 finished higher than NV. Therefore based off current results, c9>NV. Not based off current results I agree NV>c9. But you gotta pick an argument here. Are you going off current results or not? You keep flip-flopping. Choose.
yeah bro finished 1 place higher cuz they got an easy group
kristof [#36]yeah bro finished 1 place higher cuz they got an easy group
I agree. So change your argument from current results. Because the fact of the matter is beating someone by one place is still one place higher. So stop being a illogical dipshit.
Deadpanmitten94 [#35]But their strata were revealed in the first two series whereas none of rise’s strats were revealed.
100t still had more than enough time to prepare. also saying rise dont deserve their place in the rankings cuz they practise more and try harder is stupid
Deadpanmitten94 [#30]But they didn’t sooooo based off current results
based off recent results envy is better.
Deadpanmitten94 [#21]that’s a lot of ifs for someone claiming to be going off of current results so stop riding yourself
everything is based on current results kid. c9 lost to mickey mouse teams like fnatic
Deadpanmitten94 [#37]I agree. So change your argument from current results. Because the fact of the matter is beating someone by one place is still one place higher. So stop being a illogical dipshit.
they got one place higher but they never beat envy kid. envy achived more recently than cloud9
kristof [#9]what did 100T achive recently?
lets take their last 3 events
top3 in the lcq with a new player
top4 in the masters 3 (international lan), beating both gambit and ascend
top2 in the NA qualifier to masters 3
this has to be better than rise or am i tripping?
Discord