Why is there just no consistency in the teams in EU like in NA, in NA there were really the same top teams throughout the year except for a few teas rising and falling but in EU it is just not the same
Not entirely true.
Gambit - Won CIS masters, 3rd Stage 2 EMEA play offs, 2nd @ Stage 3 EMEA playoffs, Won Masters 3, 2nd @ champions.
They've been top 3 EMEA / world the whole year. That's consistent.
Acend - 1st EU masters 1, 3rd EMEA stage 3, won Champions, 2nd Redbull homrgrounds.
Liquid (jampii onwards) - 1st EMEA stage 2, 4th Iceland, 5th (losing to gambit) EMEA stage 3, 1st LCQ, 1st Redbull.
Etc etc- EMEA has had a consistent, "almost" unmovable top 3/4 for the whole year. 1 team not winning everything is the only difference compared to NA, and that's good for the scene anyway.
trola [#7]because EMEA is so competitive? i dont think NA is that consistent too, look at TSM, sentinels and envy.
TSM are very consistent in being bad since vct began??
yungbasel [#3]Not entirely true.
Gambit - Won CIS masters, 3rd Stage 2 EMEA play offs, 2nd @ Stage 3 EMEA playoffs, Won Masters 3, 2nd @ champions.
They've been top 3 EMEA / world the whole year. That's consistent.Acend - 1st EU masters 1, 3rd EMEA stage 3, won Champions, 2nd Redbull homrgrounds.
Liquid (jampii onwards) - 1st EMEA stage 2, 4th Iceland, 5th (losing to gambit) EMEA stage 3, 1st LCQ, 1st Redbull.
Etc etc- EMEA has had a consistent, "almost" unmovable top 3/4 for the whole year. 1 team not winning everything is the only difference compared to NA, and that's good for the scene anyway.
Guild also have been very consistent throughout the whole year with practically no roster changes except for -draken +draken(I guess that is quite important though..