don’t forget to set the reminder and this might be about how slots will be for the EMEA Challengers
also GGs to kru, vamos kru always. riot have to put another slot for LATAM next year they showed how strong they are
Mdkns [#2]EMEA needs 5 slots after this tournament and NA needs 2. Dont argue
The only argue is that i agree, and unfortunally they will take it out the spot from BR.
aaa420 [#3]latam doesnt need another slot,kru is their only good team
Sooo you're saying that KRU should keep farming the region without giving any other Latam teams a chance to qualify for Masters
By the way Brazil / Japan have 0 good teams, should they also get 1 spot each using Latam treatment?
Olofboost [#5]Sooo you're saying that KRU should keep farming the region without giving any other Latam teams a chance to qualify for Masters
By the way Brazil / Japan have 0 good teams, should they also get 1 spot each using Latam treatment?
yes if no other team can qual,why tf give them a chance because kru did well
aaa420 [#6]yes if no other team can qual,why tf give them a chance because kru did well
"If no other team can qual"
Well yeah, they can't qual because Latam has only 1 spot and it's taken by top-4 team in the world
Olofboost [#7]"If no other team can qual"
Well yeah, they can't qual because Latam has only 1 spot and it's taken by top-4 team in the world
Well then they should just beat kru? You think EU teams have it easier?
hekzy [#8]Well then they should just beat kru? You think EU teams have it easier?
Brazil / Japan / SEA teams have it easier with 2 slots
Why shouldn't Latam teams except KRU have this chance too
Olofboost [#7]"If no other team can qual"
Well yeah, they can't qual because Latam has only 1 spot and it's taken by top-4 team in the world
yeah and that's completely fair japan should have only 1 spot too all the the time,why give bad regions just because you feel bad for them
Olofboost [#5]Sooo you're saying that KRU should keep farming the region without giving any other Latam teams a chance to qualify for Masters
By the way Brazil / Japan have 0 good teams, should they also get 1 spot each using Latam treatment?
then why they cant win against "bad brazilians" teams and kru can???
Olofboost [#9]Brazil / Japan / SEA teams have it easier with 2 slots
Why shouldn't Latam teams except KRU have this chance too
Add without removing , just increase from 16 to 24 = solution
Olofboost [#9]Brazil / Japan / SEA teams have it easier with 2 slots
Why shouldn't Latam teams except KRU have this chance too
Firstly. Latam had a chance to take a spot from BR, then Australs lost to Furia.
Secondly, SEA is a much bigger region than LATAM.
Thirdly, Japan shouldn't even have a single slot with their dogshit teams.
Mdkns [#2]EMEA needs 5 slots after this tournament and NA needs 2. Dont argue
Even just 4 teams dominated most of the tournament so 5 slots for EMEA is going to be an overkill. And yeah LATAM does deserves 2 slots.
Edit : iirc LATAM teams did had a chance to qualify via LCQ ? So I think they rather should just increase their slots in LCQ instead of a direct slot.
Mdkns [#2]EMEA needs 5 slots after this tournament and NA needs 2. Dont argue
International tournament doesn't mean only EMEA.....EMEA has good amount of slots already...yeah they can be increased if they change it to 24 team format...But taking a slot from a region doesn't make sense....
pratik [#15]International tournament doesn't mean only EMEA.....EMEA has good amount of slots already...yeah they can be increased if they change it to 24 team format...But taking a slot from a region doesn't make sense....
Japan and Korea had 4 slots in Masters 3. Considering the amount of top orgs in EMEA, I'd say giving them another slot from Japan is fair enough.
VirajKnight [#16]Japan and Korea had 4 slots in Masters 3. Considering the amount of top orgs in EMEA, I'd say giving them another slot from Japan is fair enough.
And then u will have 2 emea teams in a group without any reason, everything other than 4 is overkill for any region. Only way emea should get more than 4 is when they seperate cis and tr
Scottyboi30 [#18]i would just add more spots in general, dont take any spots away. give korea more of a chance too. also oce would be cool to see on the international stage
Kr Region in general is dead , they got the player but no community
Thunder1 [#20]Kr Region in general is dead , they got the player but no community
thats why they need more spots for international to grow on
Mdkns [#2]EMEA needs 5 slots after this tournament and NA needs 2. Dont argue
Unfortunately riot has a bias towards NA and will base things off where their highest amount of viewers are from
PrTsty [#17]And then u will have 2 emea teams in a group without any reason, everything other than 4 is overkill for any region. Only way emea should get more than 4 is when they seperate cis and tr
So then you will see more EMEA orgs go to other regions because they don't have slots to compete. Say good bye to EMEA Valorant.
Larry [#22]Unfortunately riot has a bias towards NA and will base things off where their highest amount of viewers are from
It's such a big region and teams are also top notch...1 bad tournament doesn't define a region...I think NA deserves 3 slots...
VirajKnight [#23]So then you will see more EMEA orgs go to other regions because they don't have slots to compete. Say good bye to EMEA Valorant.
I guess that is not a problem.....orgs exploring new regions and we have seen many upsets in Champions....So other regions are also catching up pretty fast
VirajKnight [#23]So then you will see more EMEA orgs go to other regions because they don't have slots to compete. Say good bye to EMEA Valorant.
What? Thats a good thing for valorant if emea orgs go to lower regions and build superteams, emea and na have too many orgs, 10 top.orgs are enough to bring good talent together also emea doesnt have lack of talent..and when there is talent there will be good teams
Scottyboi30 [#21]thats why they need more spots for international to grow on
If I'm not wrong there are rumours of big orgs entering the Korean Valorant scene in 2022