NAOS 2-0 if same roster
NAOS
RLF
NAOS
RLF
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.47 1.36 1.57 | 249 236 264 | 27 13 14 | / 18 11 7 / | 13 5 8 | +9 +2 +7 | 75% 56% 94% | 168 162 174 | 28% 24% 33% | 2 1 1 | 4 2 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.28 1.14 1.41 | 217 193 241 | 24 12 12 | / 20 12 8 / | 14 5 9 | +4 0 +4 | 78% 63% 94% | 145 115 176 | 34% 48% 27% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.04 0.67 1.41 | 212 174 250 | 22 9 13 | / 24 15 9 / | 9 5 4 | -2 -6 +4 | 75% 63% 88% | 140 115 166 | 27% 34% 23% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
1.02 0.78 1.27 | 214 211 219 | 22 10 12 | / 23 15 8 / | 9 5 4 | -1 -5 +4 | 72% 63% 81% | 148 149 148 | 20% 13% 30% | 4 1 3 | 2 1 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.77 0.34 1.20 | 205 144 267 | 24 8 16 | / 26 16 10 / | 6 2 4 | -2 -8 +6 | 66% 56% 75% | 124 83 165 | 17% 11% 22% | 5 2 3 | 9 7 2 | -4 -5 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.48 1.61 1.36 | 276 307 246 | 30 16 14 | / 21 11 10 / | 17 5 12 | +9 +5 +4 | 81% 69% 94% | 186 203 169 | 36% 38% 33% | 4 1 3 | 1 0 1 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.00 0.37 1.63 | 214 127 302 | 22 5 17 | / 23 14 9 / | 11 3 8 | -1 -9 +8 | 66% 44% 88% | 139 90 188 | 41% 30% 47% | 4 0 4 | 1 1 0 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
0.77 0.55 0.98 | 168 114 223 | 19 7 12 | / 23 13 10 / | 4 1 3 | -4 -6 +2 | 59% 44% 75% | 114 80 149 | 40% 33% 46% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.67 0.38 0.97 | 159 102 217 | 18 6 12 | / 25 14 11 / | 6 1 5 | -7 -8 +1 | 59% 50% 69% | 100 60 141 | 26% 20% 30% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.63 0.34 0.92 | 182 147 219 | 22 8 14 | / 27 15 12 / | 5 2 3 | -5 -7 +2 | 69% 50% 88% | 112 83 140 | 21% 13% 29% | 7 4 3 | 7 6 1 | 0 -2 +2 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.29 1.71 1.48 | 262 227 297 | 48 23 25 | / 28 18 10 / | 16 8 8 | +20 +5 +15 | 76% 64% 91% | 171 151 194 | 33% 26% 39% | 4 3 1 | 5 3 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.18 1.25 1.21 | 187 179 214 | 36 21 15 | / 31 18 13 / | 27 13 14 | +5 +3 +2 | 76% 68% 87% | 134 112 161 | 36% 47% 29% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.96 1.26 1.10 | 216 215 215 | 37 22 15 | / 35 22 13 / | 15 7 8 | +2 0 +2 | 78% 71% 87% | 145 142 148 | 28% 37% 20% | 4 1 3 | 5 3 2 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.92 1.23 1.06 | 198 203 202 | 33 17 16 | / 34 22 12 / | 19 13 6 | -1 -5 +4 | 76% 71% 83% | 140 144 135 | 21% 18% 24% | 5 2 3 | 2 1 1 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.74 1.09 0.90 | 242 220 249 | 41 20 21 | / 40 24 16 / | 17 9 8 | +1 -4 +5 | 67% 61% 74% | 140 131 151 | 18% 16% 22% | 9 5 4 | 14 10 4 | -5 -5 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.47 1.21 1.33 | 242 284 224 | 42 21 21 | / 36 16 20 / | 29 10 19 | +6 +5 +1 | 76% 65% 86% | 164 185 148 | 31% 34% 28% | 5 1 4 | 3 1 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.47 1.21 0.87 | 173 128 230 | 30 8 22 | / 38 19 19 / | 18 5 13 | -8 -11 +3 | 67% 52% 79% | 120 86 148 | 33% 25% 38% | 7 2 5 | 3 2 1 | +4 0 +4 | |
|
0.60 0.91 0.77 | 151 118 187 | 28 10 18 | / 36 17 19 / | 13 3 10 | -8 -7 -1 | 61% 48% 71% | 109 84 129 | 41% 35% 45% | 3 1 2 | 4 1 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.62 0.87 0.76 | 203 180 213 | 35 14 21 | / 45 20 25 / | 11 4 7 | -10 -6 -4 | 73% 65% 79% | 125 110 137 | 29% 29% 29% | 11 6 5 | 9 6 3 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.41 1.02 0.75 | 179 120 219 | 33 12 21 | / 41 20 21 / | 10 2 8 | -8 -8 0 | 63% 57% 68% | 110 70 144 | 30% 26% 32% | 1 0 1 | 5 3 2 | -4 -3 -1 |
NAOS
RLF
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.50 1.20 2.02 | 274 217 374 | 21 10 11 | / 10 7 3 / | 3 3 0 | +11 +3 +8 | 79% 75% 86% | 176 138 240 | 40% 31% 52% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.20 1.35 0.93 | 219 269 135 | 15 13 2 | / 11 7 4 / | 6 2 4 | +4 +6 -2 | 84% 83% 86% | 152 177 108 | 29% 39% 15% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.12 1.11 1.15 | 181 193 163 | 11 7 4 | / 11 7 4 / | 10 8 2 | 0 0 0 | 84% 83% 86% | 125 137 105 | 21% 27% 8% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.11 1.28 0.83 | 278 321 206 | 17 12 5 | / 14 8 6 / | 11 7 4 | +3 +4 -1 | 68% 67% 71% | 168 196 120 | 20% 20% 21% | 4 3 1 | 5 3 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.11 1.24 0.88 | 157 160 154 | 12 9 3 | / 11 6 5 / | 13 8 5 | +1 +3 -2 | 74% 75% 71% | 115 108 127 | 40% 47% 33% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.07 1.14 1.02 | 208 232 194 | 12 5 7 | / 15 5 10 / | 12 5 7 | -3 0 -3 | 68% 57% 75% | 128 142 120 | 21% 24% 18% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.97 1.26 0.80 | 224 257 205 | 13 6 7 | / 18 5 13 / | 6 2 4 | -5 +1 -6 | 79% 100% 67% | 147 172 133 | 37% 58% 29% | 4 2 2 | 2 0 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.87 0.48 1.09 | 199 160 222 | 15 6 9 | / 16 6 10 / | 4 1 3 | -1 0 -1 | 68% 71% 67% | 127 93 148 | 35% 36% 35% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.78 0.73 0.81 | 134 127 138 | 9 3 6 | / 13 4 9 / | 9 2 7 | -4 -1 -3 | 63% 57% 67% | 99 93 102 | 42% 38% 44% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.67 0.69 0.65 | 132 129 135 | 8 3 5 | / 15 5 10 / | 7 2 5 | -7 -2 -5 | 68% 71% 67% | 88 78 94 | 20% 17% 22% | 3 2 1 | 2 1 1 | +1 +1 0 |
could be Rapid 2-1, Naos members have already disbanded and are trying out with different teams so they might have little to no practice compared to Rapid lofi
i mean xavi8k is great but he rumored to sign to ge I guess you right heheh
With papichulo leaving and xavi signed my guess for their roles will be
Mojer - Duelist
Xavi - Initiator
JA - Controller
Emman - Flex
Nexi - Sentinel
this might be, but i think nexi still on ini and xavi senti since former senti of OAS
Xavi used to play Sova and he is a lot more flexible. Considering Nexi's disastrous performance in ascension on initiator, I believe they want Nexi to be on a more comfortable role. Every time Nexi was put on sentinel he was so good.
They should disband if that is the case, xavi is originally a flex player that plays initiator and raze, so if xavi on senti which delivers results and nexi on initiator that did bad omg idk whats the use of their analyst at that point.
I’m not sure who’s more s2pd? Is it mojer for his s2pd ego peaks? Or NAOS management for keeping him after all his s2pd plays since last year?
a 12-7 choke is hilarious, riot needs to stop these tier 2 events cause its nothing but money making schemes for teams by win trading
I've been saying this since day one but, MOJER Is the reason Naos is loosing. All his kills are exit frags and eco frags, zero game sense. Literally borkum duelist > mojer
Never doubted you for a sec, JA!
Also maybe Mojer read the stuff here and it gave him a boost for the second map lol he's good xD
I don't think that's true, because some leaker said that Ja was trialing for DSG
That was after the Bleed issue tho. GE and Bleed were the first to reach out to JA 👀