0

Keep reduxx or naw?

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
eric_5008

I know rumors of n4rrate and bang but since nothing is confirmed. Imma do my favorite thing, what if scenarios.

Reduxx could be sen's woot. Assuming n4rrate is more plausible, keep curry as a sub until reduxx turns 18. For a kid, who hasn't played omen or gekko in a pro match, he was pretty damn impressive. I think you invest in him to be your next big name

#2
annoybrocc02
12
Frags
+

aint no fucking way they are playing with curry in their vct roster

#3
eric_5008
-1
Frags
+
annoybrocc02 [#2]

aint no fucking way they are playing with curry in their vct roster

assuming my scenario is possible with reduxx joining after, I'd feel bad for players like bang to join the roster to get benched so I just put curry as he's okay with being a 6th man

#4
annoybrocc02
0
Frags
+
eric_5008 [#3]

assuming my scenario is possible with reduxx joining after, I'd feel bad for players like bang to join the roster to get benched so I just put curry as he's okay with being a 6th man

that's a good point but like why not just pick up bang if the trials have went well with him?

#5
Apriljoke
-3
Frags
+
eric_5008 [#3]

assuming my scenario is possible with reduxx joining after, I'd feel bad for players like bang to join the roster to get benched so I just put curry as he's okay with being a 6th man

I think they will get n4rrate and bang then when reduxx becomes 18 they will switch every match between bang and reduxx

#6
vollizie
0
Frags
+
Apriljoke [#5]

I think they will get n4rrate and bang then when reduxx becomes 18 they will switch every match between bang and reduxx

6-man rosters have historically been awful in Valorant. Probably the last thing I want to see.

#7
eric_5008
-1
Frags
+
annoybrocc02 [#4]

that's a good point but like why not just pick up bang if the trials have went well with him?

This is just me being a huge fan of reduxx and wanting him to be in franchising. I am biased but I do feel like he'd have a higher ceiling than bang

#8
ValAnalist1
-4
Frags
+

It would be an extremely stupid decision. Sentinels don't need to create players, they have money to build a roster with players who are already proven. Those who have to take risks by placing these tier 2 players are teams with little money/options.

#9
Botroretro
0
Frags
+

isn’t he 16?

#10
Alr3adyGone
1
Frags
+
Botroretro [#9]

isn’t he 16?

17, turns 18 in april

#11
hdeqth
0
Frags
+
ValAnalist1 [#8]

It would be an extremely stupid decision. Sentinels don't need to create players, they have money to build a roster with players who are already proven. Those who have to take risks by placing these tier 2 players are teams with little money/options.

How many bad takes are you gonna have on this site. Tier 2 is a much better way to scout talent compared to reusing old tier 1 talent.

#12
4so4so4so
3
Frags
+
hdeqth [#11]

How many bad takes are you gonna have on this site. Tier 2 is a much better way to scout talent compared to reusing old tier 1 talent.

fr.. can't believe SEN reused tenz for that long

#13
ValAnalist1
1
Frags
+
hdeqth [#11]

How many bad takes are you gonna have on this site. Tier 2 is a much better way to scout talent compared to reusing old tier 1 talent.

Do you think this is like CS where the org has a tier 1 and tier 2 organization. Like Navi and NaviJr? Where can the org train the player to use him in the main team in the future?
In Valorant you need to go to the Champions, if you want to have a decent year, let's assume that Reduxx is 18 years old and can play for the franchise, would you sign him and risk a whole year until he evolves? Or would you hire an experienced player who you already know his level?
Don't be an idiot.

#14
ihatewestjett
0
Frags
+
annoybrocc02 [#2]

aint no fucking way they are playing with curry in their vct roster

Heck prod is even better than that fraud

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment