cned 293 acs vs supermassive (2nd emea)
tenz 248 acs vs g2 (4th emea barely beat VGIA)
how is this still a debate?
Varcolac [#8]"4th emea barely beat VGIA" also they almost beat Gambit, doesnt mean anything.
Sentinels have been clearly better and Tenz didnt need be the one putting the number
cned doesnt need to be the one putting the number, yet he still does
thanatos111 [#4]f0rsaken and heat not better than cned but defo better than tenz
Just kidding bro, i love Forsaken and the meme
thanatos111 [#4]f0rsaken and heat not better than cned but defo better than tenz
by your logic, f0rsaken had a 307 ACS on icebox and heat had a 375 ACS on bind, so f0rsaken and heat > cned?
thanatos111 [#9]cned doesnt need to be the one putting the number, yet he still does
except he does need
thanatos111 [#9]cned doesnt need to be the one putting the number, yet he still does
Yes his team needs him, hes for sure the best player in his roster, in the other hand Sick and Shahzam are a beast fragging aswell
DELUSIONAL_NUKKYE_FAN [#14]people are overhyping seeding too much literal 0.001s diffrence between 4th seed and 1st seed
don't tell EMEA kids that they won't listen to you
painathe [#20]I got 453 ACS on a match, does that mean I am better than TenZ and cNed?
453acs against irons is different from 300 acs in a pro match champ
shyftnot [#21]What is ACS anyway? It's 1 match and SicK (2nd best player in the world btw) swept G2 all through out Haven.
still cNed could be better than TenZ but your math isn't proof for it.
ah so tenz isnt top 3 thanks for clarifying