sunset B site

it's wild how many complains there were about pearl b site yet there's far less about sunset despite it being MUCH worse. the site is impossible to hold for both defenders and attackers, there's no need to even "retake" since the attackers play 5 B main the majority of the time and spam. there is little to no skill or variety involved whatsoever in pro play. at least on pearl we'd see some innovation with site retakes, ult usages, flanks and taking space early and it was uncommon for ALL 5 players on the team to play b main. meanwhile on sunset that's a common sight. another thing is that mid on pearl actually received some usage when hitting b site, meanwhile sunset is just 5 run down b main

even in ranked the site is horrible, unless you have a cypher and the enemy team has nothing to break trips then the site is impossible to hold (though I will admit its issues aren't as pronounced in ranked since people are very unlikely to play 5 main)

both are pretty horrendus to hold

smthlikeyou11 [#2]

both are pretty horrendus to hold

sure, but I don't think it's arguable that sunset is far worse and needs a rework asap. I can barely recall any instances of a team losing post plant on b site sunset if they played 5 main (where both teams playing are around the same level)
whereas pearl there was still a good chance of the defenders winning, sunset just seems hopeless. the round feels like a formality when spike gets planted ngl