it's not a valid argument tbh. You can only judge someone based on what he has shown.
Like if you make an argument for 'he couldn't have', I could make an argument for the opposite. It's pointless.
it's not a valid argument tbh. You can only judge someone based on what he has shown.
Like if you make an argument for 'he couldn't have', I could make an argument for the opposite. It's pointless.
but tenz has only shown in the group stage????
yes group stage wise hes a top 10 player, but group stage + playoffs u cant say anything because u cant judge if tenz can be consistent or not, so u really dont know if tenz would be up there for sure, so yes u can say hes a good player stat wise if u ONLY look at the group stage stats, if u look at group stage + playoff the sample size is too small
do you think that aspas would have shit the bed in playoffs had LEV made playoffs in kickoff or would he have been the same player we know him as?