SMB Fluke?

I’m not saying there a fluke but they seem to be pulling a Version 1 run but stomping teams in the process. Like in there own region they lost to Unity and OXG in 2/5 matches span of going by 5 - 5 - 5. Then they suddenly took off no roster change if I’m mistaken. So how did they become this dominate in a short amount of time?

that SMB was like 2 weeks old when they lost in turkey, also V1 was abusing the meta, SMB isnt

PrTsty [#2]

that SMB was like 2 weeks old when they lost in turkey, also V1 was abusing the meta, SMB isnt

V1 in terms of miracle run not just meta. But miracle run in any form. And 2 weeks is still a small amount of time to become mediocre to top level.

JinMorii [#3]

V1 in terms of miracle run not just meta. But miracle run in any form. And 2 weeks is still a small amount of time to become mediocre to top level.

u cant compare it tho, if u wanna compare, compare it to masters 1 Faze

PrTsty [#4]

u cant compare it tho, if u wanna compare, compare it to masters 1 Faze

Either way the run looks like a miracle.

their players were already incredible but players need time to gel together. you cant just put 5 cracked players and except them to be flawless from the start.

JinMorii [#5]

Either way the run looks like a miracle.

it might be a honeymood period, but it was expected that they will perform, they made a superteam like 2 or 3 weeks before the TR qualifier, after they qualified the had 4 weeks to fix any team problems

PrTsty [#7]

it might be a honeymood period, but it was expected that they will perform, they made a superteam like 2 or 3 weeks before the TR qualifier, after they qualified the had 4 weeks to fix any team problems

Ah, thanks for that information. Your right, the super team just needed time to solidify themselves.

.

tangledsouls [#6]

their players were already incredible but players need time to gel together. you cant just put 5 cracked players and except them to be flawless from the start.

Thanks

honeymoon period