Based on form, not record. Mickey Mouse wins don't count.
EDIT: The tiers are ordered by strongest as well.
0
VCT Power Rankings Week 3
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
Kryogenix [#2]GenG are clearly struggling atm, at most A tier
they played a ridiculous amount of rounds between kickoff and madrid. everyone else has to catch up to what they're doing eventually. they're still the best team in pacific imo
vreesey [#3]they played a ridiculous amount of rounds between kickoff and madrid. everyone else has to catch up to what they're doing eventually. they're still the best team in pacific imo
i do agree that they are the best pacific team overall, but currently they are not playing at their best
Kryogenix [#4]i do agree that they are the best pacific team overall, but currently they are not playing at their best
i agree. i still wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt tho. i believe they'll come thru
vreesey [#6]i agree. i still wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt tho. i believe they'll come thru
they should, but at the moment i think DRX is LOOKING better
Kryogenix [#9]they should, but at the moment i think DRX is LOOKING better
yeah i forgot to mention it in the post but the tiers are organized by ranking as well.
Docta [#11]100t below G2, KRU, AND C9? We just beat two of them
based on form, not wins. I've watched all the games and 100T haven't looked like they have super cohesive strats. they have some good ideas but i think g2, c9, and maybe kru have more playbook depth atm
Docta [#11]100t below G2, KRU, AND C9? We just beat two of them
but it's a super small difference and i wouldn't be opposed to switching it around, just had to make a distinction somewhere and i tried to keep bias from standings out of it and just base it off gameplay. good win for 100T today tho
vreesey [#12]based on form, not wins. I've watched all the games and 100T haven't looked like they have super cohesive strats. they have some good ideas but i think g2, c9, and maybe kru have more playbook depth atm
you are not watching shit then you think c9 looks more cohesive than 100t right now sure
vreesey [#12]based on form, not wins. I've watched all the games and 100T haven't looked like they have super cohesive strats. they have some good ideas but i think g2, c9, and maybe kru have more playbook depth atm
we're not watching the games i guess
fardeengg [#14]you are not watching shit then you think c9 looks more cohesive than 100t right now sure
bro then go make your own fucking tierlist. I didn't say this is the only correct one. this is just my opinion. C9 actually combo util together instead of relying so much on aim duels. different styles lend themselves to different preferences. i didn't say 100T were shit, i just said i think the other teams look better rn. you can disagree if you want
vreesey [#18]we just disagree. why so defensive
i ain't defending shit. I'm criticizing your list for obvious reasons
vreesey [#17]bro then go make your own fucking tierlist. I didn't say this is the only correct one. this is just my opinion. C9 actually combo util together instead of relying so much on aim duels. different styles lend themselves to different preferences. i didn't say 100T were shit, i just said i think the other teams look better rn. you can disagree if you want
do you think you are making sense now ?
c9 util combo was better instead of relying so much on aim duels did you watch the match today how many rounds c9 won combo util
and how many rounds oxy won them instead of util combo
Docta [#19]i ain't defending shit. I'm criticizing your list for obvious reasons
you're disagreeing with me on an opinion and stating that your completely unprovable opinion is fact. i get being a fan, but you're upset i don't like your team as much as you do
vreesey [#22]you're disagreeing with me on an opinion and stating that your completely unprovable opinion is fact. i get being a fan, but you're upset i don't like your team as much as you do
aight bro agree to disagree
we'll see how things shape up
Docta [#24]aight bro agree to disagree
we'll see how things shape up
yeah man hope to see some good val
fardeengg [#21]do you think you are making sense now ?
c9 util combo was better instead of relying so much on aim duels did you watch the match today how many rounds c9 won combo util
and how many rounds oxy won them instead of util combo
bro you're literally being reactionary right now. over the 4 games of the season c9 has looked way more cohesive than 100T and any respected caster or analyst has said that much. anyone would agree before today's game. did 100T look better than C9 today? yes bc they won. but over the course of the season thus far in MY opinion, not yours clownface, C9, KRU, and G2 have been more of a solid team.
Docta [#26]move all china teams but EDG down a tier
unironically every cn team dogwalks koi and furia atm
vreesey [#27]bro you're literally being reactionary right now. over the 4 games of the season c9 has looked way more cohesive than 100T and any respected caster or analyst has said that much. anyone would agree before today's game. did 100T look better than C9 today? yes bc they won. but over the course of the season thus far in MY opinion, not yours clownface, C9, KRU, and G2 have been more of a solid team.
idc abt G2 or KRU, but C9?
week 1 C9 looked better than 100T
week 3 100T looked better than C9
explain how an unconvincing 2-1 vs EG looks better than a convincing 2-0 vs G2 in week 2 though
Psion [#34]idc abt G2 or KRU, but C9?
week 1 C9 looked better than 100T
week 3 100T looked better than C9
explain how an unconvincing 2-1 vs EG looks better than a convincing 2-0 vs G2 in week 2 though
thats his opinion he can say whatever he wants lmao
when I asked him about which rounds he was talking about he didnt reply c9 only won rounds vs 100t when oxy just swing and got kills or some random rounds
am not saying 100t is best but saying they rely only on aim duels is braindead they improved so much from kickoff their util is good now
fardeengg [#35]thats his opinion he can say whatever he wants lmao
when I asked him about which rounds he was talking about he didnt reply c9 only won rounds vs 100t when oxy just swing and got kills or some random rounds
am not saying 100t is best but saying they rely only on aim duels is braindead they improved so much from kickoff their util is good now
yes i am asking for an explaination im not being aggressive or hostile mf
JamBrrr [#40]haha sentinels on S beaten by a C tier team. you should've clarified the meaning of your "S" here coz sentinels SUCK.
why play the games if worse teams have no chance to win? we see it all the time. SEN played bad today and EG had the anti-strats. I would bet SEN would beat EG 99/100
vreesey [#41]why play the games if worse teams have no chance to win? we see it all the time. SEN played bad today and EG had the anti-strats. I would bet SEN would beat EG 99/100
The games they play is also the reason we have tiers. SEN played bad when they really need to win so they will not rely on others result. And even if they still qualify for playoffs due to others lost, I wouldn't consider them great, I'll consider them lucky.
Discord