Rankings

We need a ranking system with points from 1 to 1000 updated like CSGO, not in all history
Similar to thespike gg
TL is not tier 2 in EU at the moment but, because of the good performance in Iceland they are top 2 so
Seems weird to me

what does 1 to 1000 change?

agree g2 shoud be lower

also its a basic algorhythm wich is long time

Listen to me.

CSGO has such rankings because there is an event every month - ESL, Blast, RMR, Summit, Flashpoint, whatever. All tier1 teams compete in these tourneys, so it's quite easy to place them on the scale from 0 to 1000, from the worst to the best.

Valorant is the game in which there are only 4 international events per year, but in current iteration of VCT it's only 3 - Reykjavik, Berlin and Los Angeles. HOW are devs supposed to create a ranking? There is no data, there are no cross-regional matches right now. HOW do you want to estimate the value of each team?

Am I the only one who doesn't give a shit about rankings? What does it even mean for you? The coolest teams are those which are leading in VCT circuit, those which are likely to qualify for Champions. Rest doesn't matter.

Olofboost [#5]

Listen to me.

CSGO has such rankings because there is an event every month - ESL, Blast, RMR, Summit, Flashpoint, whatever. All tier1 teams compete in these tourneys, so it's quite easy to place them on the scale from 0 to 1000, from the worst to the best.

Valorant is the game in which there are only 4 international events per year, but in current iteration of VCT it's only 3 - Reykjavik, Berlin and Los Angeles. HOW are devs supposed to create a ranking? There is no data, there are no cross-regional matches right now. HOW do you want to estimate the value of each team?

Am I the only one who doesn't give a shit about rankings? What does it even mean for you? The coolest teams are those which are leading in VCT circuit, those which are likely to qualify for Champions. Rest doesn't matter.

Exactly. There are just not enough tourneys for a ranking leaderboard.

Olofboost [#5]

Listen to me.

CSGO has such rankings because there is an event every month - ESL, Blast, RMR, Summit, Flashpoint, whatever. All tier1 teams compete in these tourneys, so it's quite easy to place them on the scale from 0 to 1000, from the worst to the best.

Valorant is the game in which there are only 4 international events per year, but in current iteration of VCT it's only 3 - Reykjavik, Berlin and Los Angeles. HOW are devs supposed to create a ranking? There is no data, there are no cross-regional matches right now. HOW do you want to estimate the value of each team?

Am I the only one who doesn't give a shit about rankings? What does it even mean for you? The coolest teams are those which are leading in VCT circuit, those which are likely to qualify for Champions. Rest doesn't matter.

This guy knows, listen to him

I just want to see historic rankings such as those of ESL's but better, to see how long have every team stayed in X rank for

Olofboost [#5]

Listen to me.

CSGO has such rankings because there is an event every month - ESL, Blast, RMR, Summit, Flashpoint, whatever. All tier1 teams compete in these tourneys, so it's quite easy to place them on the scale from 0 to 1000, from the worst to the best.

Valorant is the game in which there are only 4 international events per year, but in current iteration of VCT it's only 3 - Reykjavik, Berlin and Los Angeles. HOW are devs supposed to create a ranking? There is no data, there are no cross-regional matches right now. HOW do you want to estimate the value of each team?

Am I the only one who doesn't give a shit about rankings? What does it even mean for you? The coolest teams are those which are leading in VCT circuit, those which are likely to qualify for Champions. Rest doesn't matter.

I dont get the need for rankings too . And the 3 international tournaments per year is great , CS had way too many tournaments a year causing player fatigue