Minimise and swerl vs plixx
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
281 | 24 | / 17 / | 5 | +7 | ||||||||
|
258 | 22 | / 19 / | 9 | +3 | ||||||||
|
209 | 18 | / 19 / | 9 | -1 | ||||||||
|
132 | 9 | / 15 / | 8 | -6 | ||||||||
|
130 | 11 | / 19 / | 8 | -8 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
282 | 23 | / 17 / | 20 | +6 | ||||||||
|
280 | 23 | / 19 / | 7 | +4 | ||||||||
|
233 | 18 | / 15 / | 7 | +3 | ||||||||
|
147 | 14 | / 16 / | 8 | -2 | ||||||||
|
138 | 11 | / 17 / | 15 | -6 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
230 | 59 | / 45 / | 12 | +14 | ||||||||
|
213 | 45 | / 46 / | 27 | -1 | ||||||||
|
210 | 48 | / 47 / | 22 | +1 | ||||||||
|
188 | 33 | / 47 / | 22 | -14 | ||||||||
|
179 | 38 | / 48 / | 33 | -10 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
293 | 65 | / 41 / | 10 | +24 | ||||||||
|
253 | 55 | / 46 / | 34 | +9 | ||||||||
|
219 | 46 | / 51 / | 32 | -5 | ||||||||
|
176 | 36 | / 38 / | 32 | -2 | ||||||||
|
125 | 28 | / 47 / | 13 | -19 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
253 | 13 | / 13 / | 5 | 0 | ||||||||
|
241 | 11 | / 13 / | 10 | -2 | ||||||||
|
169 | 9 | / 15 / | 9 | -6 | ||||||||
|
163 | 9 | / 13 / | 6 | -4 | ||||||||
|
154 | 10 | / 15 / | 5 | -5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
374 | 24 | / 11 / | 1 | +13 | ||||||||
|
298 | 19 | / 9 / | 8 | +10 | ||||||||
|
233 | 12 | / 8 / | 10 | +4 | ||||||||
|
191 | 9 | / 11 / | 15 | -2 | ||||||||
|
95 | 5 | / 13 / | 3 | -8 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
267 | 23 | / 14 / | 9 | +9 | ||||||||
|
256 | 25 | / 13 / | 2 | +12 | ||||||||
|
204 | 17 | / 13 / | 4 | +4 | ||||||||
|
180 | 11 | / 19 / | 9 | -8 | ||||||||
|
166 | 11 | / 16 / | 18 | -5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
273 | 23 | / 15 / | 2 | +8 | ||||||||
|
187 | 14 | / 21 / | 10 | -7 | ||||||||
|
180 | 13 | / 20 / | 6 | -7 | ||||||||
|
156 | 13 | / 13 / | 7 | 0 | ||||||||
|
133 | 9 | / 18 / | 2 | -9 |
While WBG has had history of ranking above RNG, I think it is very possible that RNG makes playoff by winning the series. Swerl looked really good in his match against IMAY so I think he will play a big part in helping RNG get the win. Regardless, WBG is not to be underestimated, and this match will definitely not be a free match for either sides.
rosso4000 [#7]why the hell are there 2 skyes on the same team on bind
double skye comp is the new meta you're behind
geospliced [#6]While WBG has had history of ranking above RNG, I think it is very possible that RNG makes playoff by winning the series. Swerl looked really good in his match against IMAY so I think he will play a big part in helping RNG get the win. Regardless, WBG is not to be underestimated, and this match will definitely not be a free match for either sides.
That was a great series! Both teams were competitive, but WBG got the better this time around. I expected a close, 2-1 sort of exchange between the two, and while RNG showed many bright moments with plays from SWERL and xiaonuo, WBG reminded them that there is a gap between 7 and 11.